Skip to main content
Log in

Computer aided simulation and experimental investigation of the machinability of Al 6065 T6 during milling operation

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aluminium alloy is increasingly being used in the industries because of its high strength to weight and corrosion resistance ability. However, there is a need to investigate its machinability to ensure that it will meet the quality and functional requirements for its intended applications. Hence, this study employs the computer-aided simulation and experimental approach to investigate the machinability of Al 6065 T6 using response surface methodology (RSM) during milling operation. The RSM was implemented in the Design Expert 2022 environment and the designed experiment produced 20 experimental trials whose responses specifically, maximum contact stress, reaction force, and surface roughness determined via modelling and simulation in the Complete Abaqus Environment (CAE). The validation of the numerical analysis was done by conducting physical experimentations. This established the feasible range of process parameters that can ensure effective machinability of Al 6065 T6 during milling operation. The values of the process parameters that produced the least surface roughness for both the computer-aided simulation and experimental approaches are feed rate (0.07 mm/rev), cutting speed (15 m/min), and tool slip factor (25%). Furthermore, predictive models were developed for estimating the magnitude of maximum contact stress, reaction force, and surface roughness. The statistical analysis of the predictive models indicates that they are suitable for predictive purposes. The outcome of this study adds to the understanding of the machinability of Al 6065 T6. The empirical results can assist machinists to develop products from Al 6065 T6 that will meet the required service requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study is included in the article and has been referenced accordingly.

References

  1. Bibili Nzegue AG, Mpofu K, Mathe N, Daniyan IA, Muvunzi R (2023) An experimental investigation of selective laser process parameters on aluminium alloy (AlSi12). Procedia CIRP 118:638–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdelaoui FZE, Jabri A, Barkany AE (2023) Optimization techniques for energy efficiency in machining processes—a review. Intl J Adv Manuf Technol 125(7–8):2967–3001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Camposeco-Negrete C, de Dios Calderón-Nájera J (2019) Optimization of energy consumption and surface roughness in slot milling of AISI 6061 T6 using the response surface method. Intl J Adv Manuf Technol 103:4063–4069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tlhabadira I, Daniyan IA, Masu L, Mpofu K (2020) Development of a model for the optimization of energy consumption during the milling operation of titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V). Mater Today: Proc 38:614–620

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sangwan KS, Kant G (2017) Optimization of machining parameters for improving energy efficiency using integrated response surface methodology and genetic algorithm approach. Procedia CIRP 61:517–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yazdi MS, Khorram A (2010) Modeling and optimization of milling process by using RSM and ANN methods. IACSIT Intl J Eng Technol 2(5):474–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Phokobye SN, Daniyan IA, Tlhabadira I, Masu L, VanStaden LR (2019) Model design and optimization of carbide milling cutter for milling operation of M200 tool steel. Procedia CIRP 84:954–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Camposeco-Negrete C, de Dios Calderón-Nájera J (2019) Sustainable machining as a mean of reducing the environmental impacts related to the energy consumption of the machine tool: a case study of AISI 1045 steel machining. Intl J Adv Manuf Technol 102:27–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ochengo D, Liang L, Wei Z, Ning H (2022) Optimization of surface quality and power consumption in machining hardened AISI 4340. Adv Mater Sci Eng, Article ID 2675003, pp. 1-12

  10. Nguyen TT, Nguyen TA, Trinh QH (2020) Optimization of milling parameters for energy savings and surface quality. Arab J Sci Eng 45(11):9111–9125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hsiao TC, Vu NC, Tsai MC, Dang XP, Huang SC (2021) Modeling and optimization of machining parameters in milling of INCONEL-800 super alloy considering energy, productivity, and quality using nanoparticle suspended lubrication. Measure Control 54(5–6):880–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Garg GK, Garg S, Sangwan KS (2018) Development of an empirical model for optimization of machining parameters to minimize power consumption. In IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 346:012078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jia S, Wang S, Zhang N, Cai W, Liu Y, Hao J, Zhang Z, Yang Y, Sui Y (2022) Multi-objective parameter optimization of CNC plane milling for sustainable manufacturing. Environ Sci Pollut Res, pp.1–22

  14. Phokobye SN, Desai DA, Tlhabadira I, Sadiku ER, Daniyan IA (2023) Comparative analysis of the cutting performances of sialon ceramic, cubic boron nitride and carbide cutting tools for titanium machining. Intl J Adv Manuf Technol 128:3775–3786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Daniyan IA, Tlhabadira I, Mpofu K, Adeodu AO (2020) Process design and optimization for the milling operation of aluminum alloy (AA6063 T6). Mater Today: Proc 38:536–543

    Google Scholar 

  16. Daramola OO, Tlhabadira I, Olajide JL, Daniyan IA, Sadiku ER, Masu L, VanStaden LR (2019) Process design for optimal minimization of resultant cutting force during the machining of Ti-6Al-4V: response surface method and desirability functional analysis. Procedia CIRP 84:854–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Daniyan IA, Tlhabadira I, Phokobye SN, Siviwe M, Mpofu K (2019) Modelling and optimization of the cutting forces during Ti6Al4V milling process using the response surface methodology and dynamometer. MM Sci J 128:3353–3363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Daniyan IA, Mpofu K, Adeodu AO (2019) Optimization of welding parameters using Taguchi and response surface methodology for rail car bracket assembly. Intl J Adv Manuf Technol 100:2221–2228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Daniyan IA, Adeodu AO, Ale F, Aderoba O (2023) Investigation of surface roughness of titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) during turning operation using surface response methodology. 2023 IEEE 14th International Conference on Mechanical and Intelligent Manufacturing Technologies, Cape Town, South Africa from May 26–28, 2023. Published in IEEE Xplore, pp. 143–147

  20. MatWeb Material Property Data: Al 6065 T5. [Online Available at https://www.matweb.com/search/datasheet_print.aspx?matguid=662c43b0f45043db9e0a4a852d34bf96 [Accessed 4th April, 2023]

  21. Fameso F, Desai D, Kok S, Newby M, Glaser D (2020) Simulation of laser shock peening on X12Cr steel using an alternate computational mechanical threshold stress plasticity model. Intl J Adv Manuf Technol 111:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fameso F, Desai D (2020) Explicit analysis using time-dependent damping simulation of one-sided laser shock peening on martensitic steel turbine blades. Simulation 96(12):927–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fameso F, Desai D, Kok S, Armfield D, Newby M (2022) Residual stress enhancement by laser shock treatment in chromium-alloyed steam turbine blades. Materials 15(16):5682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Muvunzi R, Mpofu K, Daniyan IA, Fameso F (2022) Analysis of potential materials for local production of a rail car component using additive manufacturing. Heliyon 8(e09405):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yolacan TF, Schafer M (2022) Determination of slip factor between CNC-cut serrated surfaces of S355J2 steel plates. Building 12(7):995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kokkirala S, Holmberg J, Klement U, Lundstrom R, Iwasaki H, Hosseini SB (2022) Effect of cutting parameters on the generated surface integrity of hard-turned martensitic AISI 52100 bearing steel. Procedia CIRP 115:154–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bicek M, Dumont F, Courbon C, Pusavec F, Rech J, Kopac J (2012) Cryogenic machining as an alternative turning process of normalised and hardened AISI 52100 bearing steel. J Mater Process Technol 21(2):2609–2618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hosseini SB, Beno T, Klement U, Kaminski J, Ryttberg K (2014) Cutting temperatures during hard turning—measurements and effect on white layer formation in AISI 52100. J Mater Process Technol 214(6):1293–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vazquez MKP, Giardini C, Ceretti E (2014) Cutting force modelling. In: Laperriere L, Reinhart G (eds) CIRP Encyclopaedia of Production Engineering. Springers, Berlin, pp 315–329

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Gao Y, Wang G, Bermingham MS, Dargusch MS (2015) Cutting force, chip formation and tool wear during the laser-assisted machining a near-alpha titanium alloy BTi-6431S. Intl J Adv Manuf Technol 79(1949–1960):21

    Google Scholar 

  31. Seker U, Kurt A, Ciftci I (2004) The effect of feed rate on the cutting forces when machining with linear motion. J Mater Process Technol 146(3):403–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sui SC, Feng PF (2016) The influences of tool wear on Ti6Al4V cutting temperature and burn defect. Intl J Adv Manuf Technol 85(9–12):2831–2838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Aldas K, Ozkul I, Eskil M (2014) Prediction of surface roughness in longitudinal turning process by a genetic learning algorithm. Mater Test 5:375–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tien DH, Nguyen N-H, Quy TD, Thien NY (2019) Cutting forces and surface roughness in face milling of SKD61 hard steel. Strojniški vestnik – J Mech Eng 65(6):375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tlhabadira I, Daniyan IA, Masu L, VanStaden LR (2019) Process design and optimization of surface roughness during M200 TS milling process using the Taguchi method. Procedia CIRP 84:868–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Daniyan IA, Tlhabadira I, Daramola OO, Phokobye SN, Siviwe M, Mpofu K (2019) Measurement and optimization of cutting forces during m200 ts milling process using the response surface methodology and dynamometer. Procedia CIRP 88:28–293

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kumar MS, Kannan TTM, Giridharan S, Kumar PV (2014) Optimization of micro milling parameters of Al-6082 by ANOVA methodology. Intl J Mech Eng Robot Res 3(4):377

    Google Scholar 

  38. Samuel AU, Araoyinbo AO, Elewa RR, Biodun MB (2021) Effect of machining of aluminium alloys with emphasis on aluminium 6061 alloy–a review. In IOP Conference Series: Mater Sci Eng, 1107(1):012157)

  39. Zhou L, Li J, Li F, Mendis G, Sutherland JW (2018) Optimization parameters for energy efficiency in end milling. Procedia CIRP 69:312–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Camposeco-Negrete C (2015) Optimization of cutting parameters using response surface method for minimizing energy consumption and maximizing cutting quality in turning of AISI 6061 T6 aluminum. J Clean Prod 91:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bousnina K, Hamza A, Yahia NB (2022) Energy optimization for milling 304l steel using artificial intelligence methods. Intl J Auto Mech Eng 19(3):9928–9938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kadirgama K, Abou-El-Hossein KA (2005) Power prediction model for milling 618 stainless steel using response surface methodology. Am J Appl Sci 2(7):1182–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Samsedeensadham S, Mohan A, ArunRamnath R, Thilak RK Optimization of machining parameters in drilling Ti-6Al-4V using user’s preference rating based TOPSIS In: Mohan, S., Shankar, S., Rajeshkumar, G. (eds) Materials, Design, and Manufacturing for Sustainable Environment. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9809-8_34

  44. Samsudeensadham S, Krishnaraj V, Ramachandran A (2023) Multi-attribute optimization of drilling CFRP/Ti-6Al-4V alloy hybrid stacks using VIKOR. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: J Process Mech Eng, 0(0). doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089231206037

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Achievers University, Owo, Nigeria, where this work was carried out.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The conceptualization, experimentation, results analysis, writing—original draft, visualization, data curation, format analysis, and editing were the collective work of the authors.

vdssvs

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilesanmi Daniyan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The study requires no ethical approval.

Consent to participate

This is not applicable to this study.

Consent for publication

This is not applicable to this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daniyan, I., Ale, F., Fameso, F. et al. Computer aided simulation and experimental investigation of the machinability of Al 6065 T6 during milling operation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13772-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13772-9

Keywords

Navigation