Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical behavior of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic during rotary ultrasonic machining

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an investigation into the machining of CFRP composites using rotary ultrasonic machining. The study aims to analyze how various process parameters influence machining performance and to identify the optimal value of cutting force. The design approach employed isolates the effects of individual characteristics and explores the interactions between them. The results of this study reveal a nuanced interplay between the investigated parameters and the mechanical behavior of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) during rotary ultrasonic machining (RUM). Notably, variations in vibration amplitude (VA), tool rotation speed (TRS), and feed rate (Fr) significantly influenced the cutting force exerted on the CFRP material. Surprisingly, while both VA and TRS exhibited noticeable effects on the machining process, the feed rate emerged as the predominant factor in determining optimal cutting force levels. Specifically, the data illustrate that higher feed rates led to reduced cutting forces, indicating improved machinability. This unexpected inverse relationship prompts a reconsideration of traditional assumptions about the influence of process parameters on CFRP machining. The outcomes suggest that a strategic emphasis on feed rate adjustment can mitigate cutting forces, potentially enhancing the overall efficiency and quality of CFRP machining operations. These findings carry implications for industries reliant on CFRP components, such as aerospace and automotive sectors, offering a practical guide for optimizing machining processes and advancing the broader understanding of CFRP behavior under RUM conditions. The observed trends also open avenues for further research into the intricate dynamics of material removal in composite structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

No data, models, or code were generated or used during the study.

References

  1. Franceschini G, Macchietto S (2008) Model-based design of experiments for parameter precision: state of the art. Chem Eng Sci 63:4846–4872

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Turrin M, Von Buelow P, Stouffs R (2011) Design explorations of performance driven geometry in architectural design using parametric modeling and genetic algorithms. Adv Eng Inform 25:656–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Frigon NL, Mathews D (1996) Practical guide to experimental design, John Wiley and Sons Onc., New York, NY

  4. Hinkelmann K, Kempthorne O (2007) Design and analysis of experiments, volume 1: introduction to experimental design vol 1. John Wiley & Sons

  5. Li J, Jin H, Hu Q, Lin Z, Fu J (2023) Optimizing 5-axis tool positioning and orientation for machining CFRP curved surfaces: considering fibers’ orientation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 128:581–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang X, Song C, Tong J, Li L, Wu M, Zhao B (2022) Study on the influence of ultrasonic-assisted cutting on the surface quality of CFRP. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 1–12

  7. Rizzo A, Goel S, Luisa Grilli M, Iglesias R, Jaworska L, Lapkovskis V et al (2020) The critical raw materials in cutting tools for machining applications: a review. Materials 13:1377

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fernando PKSC, Zhang M, Pei Z (2019) Rotary ultrasonic machining: effects of tool natural frequency on ultrasonic vibration amplitude. Mach Sci Technol 23:595–611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Li Y, Zhang D, Wang H, Ye G, He R, Cong W (2022) Theoretical and experimental investigations on rotary ultrasonic surface micro-machining of brittle materials. Ultrason Sonochem 89:106162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Overcash JL, Cuttino JF (2009) Design and experimental results of a tunable vibration turning device operating at ultrasonic frequencies. Precis Eng 33:127–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang Z, Zhu L, Zhang G, Ni C, Lin B (2020) Review of ultrasonic vibration-assisted machining in advanced materials. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 156:103594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. De Bartolomeis A (2021) Cooling and lubrication technologies for machining advanced alloys. University of Bath

  13. Wang H, Hu Y, Cong W, Hu Z (2019) A mechanistic model on feeding-directional cutting force in surface grinding of CFRP composites using rotary ultrasonic machining with horizontal ultrasonic vibration. Int J Mech Sci 155:450–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chuangwen X, Jianming D, Yuzhen C, Huaiyuan L, Zhicheng S, Jing X (2018) The relationships between cutting parameters, tool wear, cutting force and vibration. Adv Mech Eng 10:1687814017750434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sarıkaya M, Gupta MK, Tomaz I, Pimenov DY, Kuntoğlu M, Khanna N et al (2021) A state-of-the-art review on tool wear and surface integrity characteristics in machining of superalloys. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 35:624–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yarar E (2023) Reducing delamination risk with response surface methodology-supported drilling analysis for Nomex® aramid fiber composites. Journal of Composite Materials 00219983231224113

  17. Nabavi SF, Farshidianfar A, Dalir H (2023) An applicable review on recent laser beam cutting process characteristics modeling: geometrical, metallurgical, mechanical, and defect. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 1–59

  18. Kanishka K, Acherjee B (2023) Revolutionizing manufacturing: a comprehensive overview of additive manufacturing processes, materials, developments, and challenges. J Manuf Process 107:574–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lahouel AA, Mekidiche M, Slimane A, Sahli N (2023) A comparative analysis of photocatalytic applications using poly [(vanillin-co-pyrrole)]/ZnO and TiO2-based semiconductor under natural sunlight irradiation. J Appl Polym Sci 140:e54361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Asmael M, Safaei B, Zeeshan Q, Zargar O, Nuhu AA (2021) Ultrasonic machining of carbon fiber–reinforced plastic composites: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113:3079–3120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang H, Cong W, Ning F, Hu Y (2018) A study on the effects of machining variables in surface grinding of CFRP composites using rotary ultrasonic machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:3651–3663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Slimane A, Bouchouicha B, Benguediab M, Slimane SA (2015) Contribution to the study of fatigue and rupture of welded structures in carbon steel-a48 ap: experimental and numerical study. Trans Indian Inst Met 68:465–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Slimane A, Bouchouicha B, Benguediab M, Slimane S-A (2015) Parametric study of the ductile damage by the Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman model of structures in carbon steel A48-AP. J Market Res 4:217–223

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lahouel AA, Mekidiche M, Belmir C, Slimane A, Sahli N (2023) Synthesis and characterization of poly (vanillin pyrrole)/zinc oxide composite for photocatalysis application under natural sunlight irradiation. Polymer Science, Series B, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  25. Belhadj M, Lahbari N, Slimane A, Aouiche D (2020) An interactive method to analysis of the response of the different reinforcement structures of a door opening of a wind tower. Period Polytechn Mech Eng 64:263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Islam S, Yuan S, Li Z (2020) A cutting force prediction model, experimental studies, and optimization of cutting parameters for rotary ultrasonic face milling of C/SiC composites. Appl Compos Mater 27:407–431

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hu L, Tang R, Cai W, Feng Y, Ma X (2019) Optimisation of cutting parameters for improving energy efficiency in machining process. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 59:406–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fan M, Zhou X, Song J (2024) Experimental investigation on cutting force and machining parameters optimization in in-situ laser-assisted machining of glass–ceramic. Opt Laser Technol 169:110109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Slimane A, Kebdani S, Bouchouicha B, Benguediab M, Slimane S, Bahram K et al (2018) An interactive method for predicting industrial equipment defects. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:4341–4351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Slimane S, Kebdani S, Boudjemai A, Slimane A (2018) Effect of position of tension-loaded inserts on honeycomb panels used for space applications. Int J Interact Design Manuf (IJIDeM) 12:393–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhu W, Fu H, Li F, Ji X, Li Y, Bai F (2022) Optimization of CFRP drilling process: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 123:1403–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Slimane SA, Slimane A, Guelailia A, Boudjemai A, Kebdani S, Smahat A et al (2022) Hypervelocity impact on honeycomb structure reinforced with bi-layer ceramic/aluminum facesheets used for spacecraft shielding. Mech Adv Mater Struct 29:4487–4505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Khatamsaz D, Neuberger R, Roy AM, Zadeh SH, Otis R, Arróyave R (2023) A physics informed bayesian optimization approach for material design: application to NiTi shape memory alloys. NPJ Comput Mater 9:221

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu CJ, Hamada MS (2011) Experiments: planning, analysis, and optimization. John Wiley & Sons, ISBN: 978-1-119-47010-6

  35. Kaddour B, Bouchouicha B, Benguediab M, Slimane A (2018) Modeling and optimization of a cracked pipeline under pressure by an interactive method: design of experiments. Int J Interact Design Manuf (IJIDeM) 12:409–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dahmane S-A, Azzedine A, Megueni A, Slimane A (2019) Quantitative and qualitative study of methods for solving the kinematic problem of a planar parallel manipulator based on precision error optimization. Int J Interact Design Manuf (IJIDeM) 13:567–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chaib M, Slimane A, Slimane SA, Ziadi A, Bouchouicha B (2021) Optimization of ultimate tensile strength with DOE approach for application FSW process in the aluminum alloys AA6061-T651 & AA7075-T651. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale 15:169–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Dahmane SA, Megueni A, Azzedine A, Slimane A, Lousdad A (2019) Determination of the optimal path of three axes robot using genetic algorithm. Int J Eng Res Afr 44:135–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kadem M, Semmah A, Wira P, Slimane A (2020) Artificial neural network active power filter with immunity in distributed generation. Period Polytechn Mech Eng 64:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dahmane S-A, Slimane A, Chaib M, Kadem M, Nehari L, Slimane S-A et al (2023) Analysis and compensation of positioning errors of robotic systems by an interactive method. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 45:119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bahram K, Bouchouicha B, Benguediab M, Slimane A (2017) Admissibility of external cracks in a pipeline API X60 using the SINTAP procedure. Periodica Polytechn Mech Eng 61:261–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Slimane A, Slimane S, Kebdani S, Chaib M, Dahmane S, Bouchouicha B et al (2019) Parameters effects analysis of rotary ultrasonic machining on carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) composite using an interactive RSM Method. Int J Interact Design Manuf (IJIDeM) 13:521–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Anwar S, Nasr MM, Al-Ahmari A, Alkahtani M, Abdo B, El-Tamimi A et al (2018) Rotary ultrasonic drilling of Ti6Al4V: effects of machining parameters and tool diameter. Adv Mech Eng 10:1687814017750784

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Cong W, Pei Z, Sun X, Zhang C (2014) Rotary ultrasonic machining of CFRP: a mechanistic predictive model for cutting force. Ultrasonics 54:663–675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kim K, Jung YC, Kim SY, Yang B, Kim J (2018) Adhesion enhancement and damage protection for carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites via silica particle coating. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 109:105–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Lebbal H, Chaib M, Slimane A, Ait Kaci D, Boualem N (2023) Experimental investigation with optimization of spot welding parameters on stainless steel AISI 304. JOM 75:4993–5002

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Cong W, Pei ZJ, Treadwell C (2014) Preliminary study on rotary ultrasonic machining of CFRP/Ti stacks. Ultrasonics 54:1594–1602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ning F, Cong W, Wang H, Hu Y, Hu Z, Pei Z (2017) Surface grinding of CFRP composites with rotary ultrasonic machining: a mechanistic model on cutting force in the feed direction. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:1217–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to all individuals who contributed to the success of this project, and we sincerely appreciate the collaborative efforts of everyone involved.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AS: conceptualization, methodology, writing; MC: writing, reviewing, and editing; S-AS: formal analysis; SD: supervision; AAL: writing, formal analysis; AG: supervision; KB: visualization, investigation; SK: supervision, investigation, data curation; BB: supervision, data curation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdelkader Slimane.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Slimane, A., Chaib, M., Slimane, S. et al. Mechanical behavior of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic during rotary ultrasonic machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 130, 5345–5357 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-12995-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-12995-0

Keywords

Navigation