Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigation into the effect of process parameters on density, surface roughness, and mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel fabricated by selective laser melting

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selective laser melting (SLM) process produces high-performance metal parts using a layer-by-layer technique involving various influential factors. Nevertheless, there is a research gap in predictive models for the performance of SLM-processed 316L stainless steel, specifically concerning the effect of process parameters and their interactions. To address this, a systematic approach based on Taguchi design and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to optimize the SLM processing of 316L stainless steel. An experimental plan was set up using an L9 orthogonal array, with laser power, hatch spacing, and scan speed as input variables, each with three levels. Optical microscopy was used to analyze microstructure and porosity, while response variables, including relative density, surface roughness, hardness, and tensile properties, were measured. Regression models and response surface method (RSM) contour plots modeling the relationship between the input factors and the response variables were also presented. The main aim of this study is to provide valuable design tools for predicting and optimizing the performance of 316L SS processed by SLM. Results showed high densification levels (up to 99.97%) and excellent mechanical properties, surpassing conventionally processed 316L SS. The sample produced at P = 170W, h = 0.08 mm, and v = 1000 mm/s exhibited the highest tensile properties with a yield strength of 421 MPa, hardness of 245 HV, and elongation at failure of 42%. For the variation range, ANOVA results showed that hatch spacing was the most significant parameter influencing relative density and mechanical properties. The scan speed and hatch spacing increase negatively impacted all properties due to low densification. Moreover, increased laser power can melt the powder, resulting in less porosity. As a result, surface finish and ductility are improved. Overall, the findings of this paper contribute to the fabrication of stainless steel 316L using SLM with optimized parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23(6):1917–1928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z. (Springer New York LLC)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beaman JJ, Bourell DL, Seepersad CC, Kovar D (2020) Additive manufacturing review: early past to current practice. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 142(11). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4048193 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME))

  3. Brandt M (2016) Laser additive manufacturing: materials, design, technologies, and applications. Laser Mater Process

  4. DebRoy T et al (2018) Additive manufacturing of metallic components – process, structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci 92:112–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001. (Elsevier Ltd)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zitelli C, Folgarait P, Di Schino A (2019) Laser powder bed fusion of stainless steel grades: a review. Metals 9(7):731 (Basel)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gokuldoss PK, Kolla S, Eckert J (2017) Additive manufacturing processes: selective laser melting, electron beam melting and binder jetting-selection guidelines. Materials 10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10060672 (MDPI AG)

  7. Oliveira JP, LaLonde AD, Ma J (2020) Processing parameters in laser powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing. Mater Des 193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108762

  8. Yap CY et al (2015) Review of selective laser melting: materials and applications. Appl Phys Rev 2(4)

  9. Yadroitsev I, Smurov I (2010) Selective laser melting technology: from the single laser melted track stability to 3D parts of complex shape. Phys Procedia 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2010.08.083 (Elsevier B.V.)

  10. Liu Y, Zhang J, Pang Z (2018) Numerical and experimental investigation into the subsequent thermal cycling during selective laser melting of multi-layer 316L stainless steel. Opt Laser Technol 98:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.07.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Riemer A, Leuders S, Thöne M, Richard HA, Tröster T, Niendorf T (2014) On the fatigue crack growth behavior in 316L stainless steel manufactured by selective laser melting. Eng Fract Mech 120:15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cui L, Jiang S, Xu J, Peng RL, Mousavian RT, Moverare J (2021) Revealing relationships between microstructure and hardening nature of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel. Mater Des 198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109385

  13. Lodhi MJK, Deen KM, Greenlee-Wacker MC, Haider W (2019) Additively manufactured 316L stainless steel with improved corrosion resistance and biological response for biomedical applications. Addit Manuf 27:8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cherry JA, Davies HM, Mehmood S, Lavery NP, Brown SGR, Sienz J (2015) Investigation into the effect of process parameters on microstructural and physical properties of 316L stainless steel parts by selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(5–8):869–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6297-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tucho WM, Lysne VH, Austbø H, Sjolyst-Kverneland A, Hansen V (2018) Investigation of effects of process parameters on microstructure and hardness of SLM manufactured SS316L. J Alloys Compd 740:910–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liverani E, Toschi S, Ceschini L, Fortunato A (2017) Effect of selective laser melting (SLM) process parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of 316L austenitic stainless steel. J Mater Process Technol 249:255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.05.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Greco S, Gutzeit K, Hotz H, Kirsch B, Aurich JC (2020) Selective laser melting (SLM) of AISI 316L—impact of laser power, layer thickness, and hatch spacing on roughness, density, and microhardness at constant input energy density. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108(5–6):1551–1562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05510-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sheshadri R et al (2021) Experimental investigation of selective laser melting parameters for higher surface quality and microhardness properties: taguchi and super ranking concept approaches. J Market Res 14:2586–2600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Read N, Wang W, Essa K, Attallah MM (2015) Selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg alloy: process optimisation and mechanical properties development. Mater Des 65:417–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miranda G et al (2016) Predictive models for physical and mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel produced by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng A 657:43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.01.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang HZ et al (2019) Factor analysis of selective laser melting process parameters with normalised quantities and Taguchi method. Opt Laser Technol 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.105592

  22. Yang WH, Tarng YS (1998) Design optimization of cutting parameters for turning operations based on the Taguchi method. J Mater Process Technol 84(1–3):122–129

  23. Ahmed N, Barsoum I, Haidemenopoulos G, Al-Rub RKA (2022) Process parameter selection and optimization of laser powder bed fusion for 316L stainless steel: a review. J Manuf Process 75:415–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.064. (Elsevier Ltd)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vallejo ND, Lucas C, Ayers N, Graydon K, Hyer H, Sohn Y (2021) Process optimization and microstructure analysis to understand laser powder bed fusion of 316l stainless steel. Metals 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/met11050832 (Basel)

  25. Astm I (2016) ASTM E8/E8M-16a: standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  26. Marattukalam JJ et al (2020) The effect of laser scanning strategies on texture, mechanical properties, and site-specific grain orientation in selective laser melted 316L SS. Mater Des 193:108852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Omidi N, Farhadipour P, Barka N (2023) Investigation into the effect of the SLM processing parameters on the microstructure and mechanical behavior of M300; experimental and statistical analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1–16

  28. Greco S, Gutzeit K, Hotz H, Kirsch B, Aurich JC (2020) Selective laser melting (SLM) of AISI 316L—impact of laser power, layer thickness, and hatch spacing on roughness, density, and microhardness at constant input energy density. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108:1551–1562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Standard A (2007) E407. Standard practice for microetching metals and alloys. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.https://doi.org/10.1520/E0407-07”.ed

  30. Röttger A et al (2020) Microstructure and mechanical properties of 316L austenitic stainless steel processed by different SLM devices. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108:769–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Montgomery DC (2017) Design and analysis of experiments. John Wiley & Sons

  32. Qiu C, Al Kindi M, Aladawi AS, Al Hatmi I (2018) A comprehensive study on microstructure and tensile behaviour of a selectively laser melted stainless steel. Sci Rep 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26136-7

  33. Saeidi K, Gao X, Zhong Y, Shen ZJ (2015) Hardened austenite steel with columnar sub-grain structure formed by laser melting. Mater Sci Eng A 625:221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.12.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang YM et al (2018) Additively manufactured hierarchical stainless steels with high strength and ductility. Nat Mater 17(1):63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang D, Song C, Yang Y, Bai Y (2016) Investigation of crystal growth mechanism during selective laser melting and mechanical property characterization of 316L stainless steel parts. Mater Des 100:291–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yan F, Xiong W, Faierson EJ (2017) Grain structure control of additively manufactured metallic materials. Materials 10(11):1260. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10111260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhong Y, Liu L, Wikman S, Cui D, Shen Z (2016) Intragranular cellular segregation network structure strengthening 316L stainless steel prepared by selective laser melting. J Nucl Mater 470:170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.12.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kurzynowski T, Gruber K, Stopyra W, Kuźnicka B, Chlebus E (2018) Correlation between process parameters, microstructure and properties of 316 L stainless steel processed by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng A 718:64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.01.103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Montero-Sistiaga ML, Godino-Martinez M, Boschmans K, Kruth JP, Van Humbeeck J, Vanmeensel K (2018) Microstructure evolution of 316L produced by HP-SLM (high power selective laser melting). Addit Manuf 23:402–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bahl S, Mishra S, Yazar KU, Kola IR, Chatterjee K, Suwas S (2019) Non-equilibrium microstructure, crystallographic texture and morphological texture synergistically result in unusual mechanical properties of 3D printed 316L stainless steel. Addit Manuf 28:65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.04.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jiang HZ et al (2021) Effect of process parameters on defects, melt pool shape, microstructure, and tensile behavior of 316L stainless steel produced by selective laser melting. Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett) 34(4):495–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-020-01143-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang B, Li Y, Bai Q (2017) Defect formation mechanisms in selective laser melting: a review. Chin J Mech Eng (Engl Ed) 30(3):515–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10033-017-0121-5. (Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Snow Z, Nassar AR, Reutzel EW (2020) Invited review article: review of the formation and impact of flaws in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 36:101457

    Google Scholar 

  44. Choo H et al (2019) Effect of laser power on defect, texture, and microstructure of a laser powder bed fusion processed 316L stainless steel. Mater Des 164:107534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang M et al (2017) Fatigue and fracture behaviour of laser powder bed fusion stainless steel 316L: influence of processing parameters. Mater Sci Eng A 703:251–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mohd Yusuf S, Chen Y, Boardman R, Yang S, Gao N (2017) Investigation on porosity and microhardness of 316L stainless steel fabricated by selective laser melting. Metals 7(2):64 (Basel)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Alamri NMH, Packianather M, Bigot S (2022) Predicting the porosity in selective laser melting parts using hybrid regression convolutional neural network. Appl Sci 12(24):12571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Dong Z, Liu Y, Wen W, Ge J, Liang J (2018) Effect of hatch spacing on melt pool and as-built quality during selective laser melting of stainless steel: modeling and experimental approaches. Materials 12(1):50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yakout M, Elbestawi MA, Veldhuis SC (2019) Density and mechanical properties in selective laser melting of Invar 36 and stainless steel 316L. J Mater Process Technol 266:397–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Gu D, Shen Y (2009) Balling phenomena in direct laser sintering of stainless steel powder: metallurgical mechanisms and control methods. Mater Des 30(8):2903–2910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hao L, Wang W, Zeng J, Song M, Chang S, Zhu C (2023) Effect of scanning speed and laser power on formability, microstructure, and quality of 316l stainless steel prepared by selective laser melting. J Mater Res Technol

  52. Wang D, Liu Y, Yang Y, Xiao D (2016) Theoretical and experimental study on surface roughness of 316L stainless steel metal parts obtained through selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyp J 22(4):706–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. ASTM A (2017) A240/A240M-17, Standard specification for chromium and chromium-nickel stainless steel plate, sheet, and strip for pressure vessels and for general applications. Sheet, West Conshohocken, PAASTM International, 2018a. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1520/A0240_A0240M-18

  54. Casati R, Lemke J, Vedani M (2016) Microstructure and fracture behavior of 316L austenitic stainless steel produced by selective laser melting. J Mater Sci Technol 32(8):738–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2016.06.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Suryawanshi J, Prashanth KG, Ramamurty U (2017) Mechanical behavior of selective laser melted 316L stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng, A 696:113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.04.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Leicht A, Rashidi M, Klement U, Hryha E (2020) Effect of process parameters on the microstructure, tensile strength and productivity of 316L parts produced by laser powder bed fusion. Mater Charact 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2019.110016

  57. Röttger A et al (2020) Microstructure and mechanical properties of 316L austenitic stainless steel processed by different SLM devices. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108(3):769–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05371-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Sadeghi MS, Mohseni M, Etefagh AH, Khajehzadeh M (2023) The effect of process parameters and scanning strategies on surface roughness of stainless steel 316L SLM parts. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E: J Process Mech Eng 237(6):2510–2519

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Asma Mansoura, Shayan Dehghan, Noureddine Barka, and Sasan Sattarpanah Karganroudi; methodology: Asma Mansoura, Shayan Dehghan, and Noureddine Barka; formal analysis: Asma Mansoura, Shayan Dehghan, and Noureddine Barka; investigation: Asma Mansoura and Shayan Dehghan; resources: Asma Mansoura; data curation: Asma Mansoura and Shayan Dehghan; writing—original draft preparation: Asma Mansoura; writing—review and editing: Asma Mansoura and Shayan Dehghan. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shayan Dehghan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mansoura, A., Dehghan, S., Barka, N. et al. Investigation into the effect of process parameters on density, surface roughness, and mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel fabricated by selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 130, 2547–2562 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12865-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12865-1

Keywords

Navigation