Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Linking alloy thermo-physical behavior to laser process parameters for density optimization in LPBF

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work reports on employing X-ray computed tomography (XCT) to develop a predictive model aimed at optimizing laser process parameters for laser powder bed fusion. A commercially available statistical analysis software was successfully combined with XCT obtained porosity data obtained from 316L stainless steel to develop an accurate model that predicted the parameter sets and ranges with the lowest porosity. The predictions indicated that laser velocity and hatch spacing had a numerically linear relationship with laser power and can be combined to minimize porosity at any selected laser power in a specific range. In fact, the predictions indicated that the minimum porosity at any laser power is associated with a specific line energy input of approximately 0.13 J/mm for this alloy. The lowest predicted porosity at each laser power was fabricated and tested with the 85- and 92-W powers confirming ultra-low porosity. Lower laser powers, however, exhibited significantly higher porosity in contrast with the prediction. This resulted from the lower hatch spacing and velocity causing higher energy density and metallurgical defects from macro-balling. Thermodynamic calculations in the optimum laser power range yielded a line energy of 0.131 J/mm, which agrees rather well with the XCT predicted line energy and indicates that porosity generation is governed by the thermo-physical behavior of the alloy. A parameter space in the optimum range was fabricated and confirmed that the lowest porosities exist along a line energy of 0.13 J/mm, where melt pool temperature was predicted to be between 2526 and 2785 °C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cooke S, Ahmadi K, Willerth S, Herring R (2020) Metal additive manufacturing: technology, metallurgy and modelling. J Manuf Process 57:978–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh S, Ramakrishna S, Singh R (2017) Material issues in additive manufacturing: a review. J Manuf Process 25:185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tang M, Pistorius PC, Beuth JL (2017) Prediction of lack-of-fusion porosity for powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf 14:39–48

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lewandowski JJ, Seifi M (2016) Metal additive manufacturing: a review of mechanical properties. Annu Rev Mater Res 46:151–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mower TM, Long MJ (2016) Mechanical behavior of additive manufactured, powder-bed laser-fused materials. Mater Sci Eng, A 651:198–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. du Plessis A, Yadroitsava I, Yadroitsev I (2020) Effects of defects on mechanical properties in metal additive manufacturing: a review focusing on X-ray tomography insights. Mater Des 187:108385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. du Plessis A (2019) Effects of process parameters on porosity in laser powder bed fusion revealed by X-ray tomography. Addit Manuf 30:100871

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barsoum I, Haidemenopoulos G, Abu A-R (2022) Process parameter selection and optimization of laser powder bed fusion for 316L stainless steel: a review. J Manuf Process 75:415–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kobryn PA, Moore EH, Semiatin SL (2000) The effect of laser power and traverse speed on microstructure, porosity, and build height in laser-deposited Ti-6Al-4V. Scripta Mater 43:299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gong H, Rafi K, Gu H, Starr T, Stucker B (2014) Analysis of defect generation in Ti–6Al–4V parts made using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes. Addit Manuf 1–4:87–98

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gordon JV, Narra SP, Cunningham RW, Liu H, Chen H, Suter RM et al (2020) Defect structure process maps for laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 36:101552

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kluczyński J, Śnieżek L, Grzelak K, Mierzyński J (2018) The influence of exposure energy density on porosity and microhardness of the SLM additive manufactured elements. Materials (Basel) 11:2304–2314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kasperovich G, Haubrich J, Gussone J, Requena G (2016) Correlation between porosity and processing parameters in TiAl6V4 produced by selective laser melting. Mater Des 105:160–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Calignano F, Minetola P (2019) Influence of process parameters on the porosity, accuracy, roughness, and support structures of Hastelloy X produced by laser powder bed fusion. Materials (Basel) 12:3178–3188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar P, Farah J, Akram J, Teng C, Ginn J, Misra M (2019) Influence of laser processing parameters on porosity in Inconel 718 during additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103:1497–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Famodimu OH, Stanford M, Oduoza CF, Zhang L (2018) Effect of process parameters on the density and porosity of laser melted AlSi10Mg/SiC metal matrix composite. Front Mech Eng 13:520–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Promoppatum P, Srinivasan R, Quek SS, Msolli S, Shukla S, Johan NS et al (2022) Quantification and prediction of lack-of-fusion porosity in the high porosity regime during laser powder bed fusion of Ti-6Al-4V. J Mater Process Technol 300:117426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shrestha S, Starr T, Chou K (2019) A study of keyhole porosity in selective laser melting: single-track scanning with micro-CT analysis. J Manuf Sci Eng 141:071004–071015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Koutiri I, Pessard E, Peyre P, Amlou O, De Terris T (2018) Influence of SLM process parameters on the surface finish, porosity rate and fatigue behavior of as-built Inconel 625 parts. J Mater Process Technol 255:536–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Qin S, Bo Y, Herzog S, Hallstedt B, Kaletsch A, Broeckmann C (2022) Influence of process parameters on porosity and hot cracking of AISI H13 fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. Powders 1:184–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Leung CLA, Luczyniec D, Guo E, Marussi S, Atwood RC, Meisnar M et al (2022) Quantification of interdependent dynamics during laser additive manufacturing using X-ray imaging informed multi-physics and multiphase simulation. Adv Sci 9:2203546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sinclair L, Leung CLA, Marussi S, Clark SJ, Chen Y, Olbinado MP et al (2020) In situ radiographic and ex situ tomographic analysis of pore interactions during multilayer builds in laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf 36:101512

    Google Scholar 

  23. Criales LE, Arısoy YM, Lane B, Moylan S, Donmez A, Özel T (2017) Laser powder bed fusion of nickel alloy 625: experimental investigations of effects of process parameters on melt pool size and shape with spatter analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 121:22–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Montgomery DC (2012) Design and analysis of experiments, 8th edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tenbrock C, Fischer FG, Wissenbach K, Schleifenbaum JH, Wagenblast P, Meiners W et al (2020) Influence of keyhole and conduction mode melting for top-hat shaped beam profiles in laser powder bed fusion. J Mater Process Technol 278:116514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aggarwal A, Patel S, Kumar A (2019) Selective laser melting of 316L stainless steel: physics of melting mode transition and its influence on microstructural and mechanical behavior. JOM 71:1105–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. du Plessis A, Yadroitsev I, Yadroitsava I, Le Roux SG (2018) X-Ray microcomputed tomography in additive manufacturing: a review of the current technology and applications. 3D Print Addit Manuf 5:227–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Snell R, Tammas-Williams S, Chechik L, Lyle A, Hernández-Nava E, Boig C et al (2020) Methods for rapid pore classification in metal additive manufacturing. JOM 72:101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nudelis N, Mayr P (2021) A novel classification method for pores in laser powder bed fusion. Metals 11:1912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gui Y, Aoyagi K, Bian H, Chiba A (2022) Detection, classification and prediction of internal defects from surface morphology data of metal parts fabricated by powder bed fusion type additive manufacturing using an electron beam. Addit Manuf 54:102736

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wei HL, Mukherjee T, Zhang W, Zuback JS, Knapp GL, De A et al (2021) Mechanistic models for additive manufacturing of metallic components. Prog Mater Sci 116:100703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bäuerle D (2011) Laser Processing and Chemistry. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. King WE, Barth HD, Castillo VM, Gallegos GF, Gibbs JW, Hahn DE et al (2014) Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 214:2915–2925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Trapp J, Rubenchik AM, Guss G, Matthews MJ (2017) In situ absorptivity measurements of metallic powders during laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. Appl Mater Today 9:341–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Boley CD, Mitchell SC, Rubenchik AM, Wu SSQ (2016) Metal powder absorptivity: modeling and experiment. Appl Opt 55:6496–6500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim CS (1975) Thermophysical properties of stainless steel. Argonne National Laboratory No. ANL-75-55 pp 1–23

  37. Rai R, Elmer J, Palmer T, DebRoy T (2007) Heat transfer and fluid flow during keyhole mode laser welding of tantalum, Ti–6Al–4V, 304L stainless steel and vanadium. J Phys D Appl Phys 40:5753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Patel S, Vlasea M (2020) Melting modes in laser powder bed fusion. Materialia 9:100591

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was sponsored by the United States National Institute of Standards and Technology under contracts NIST-70NANB16H272, NIST-70NANB17H295, and NIST-70NANB18H220.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Materials Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA

    Rong Zhao, Andrii Shmatok, Ralf D. Fischer & Barton C. Prorok

Authors
  1. Rong Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrii Shmatok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ralf D. Fischer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Barton C. Prorok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RZ contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection and analysis were performed by RZ, AS, RF, and BP. The first draft of the manuscript was written by RZ and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barton C. Prorok.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: BCP reports financial support provided by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, R., Shmatok, A., Fischer, R.D. et al. Linking alloy thermo-physical behavior to laser process parameters for density optimization in LPBF. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 129, 3171–3183 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12501-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12501-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation