Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of cryogenic cooling on residual stresses and surface finish of 316L during hybrid manufacturing

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of additive manufacturing (AM) has increased significantly in recent years, primarily to produce critical and small components with complex geometry that cannot be manufactured through conventional processes. The application of a secondary process, such as machining, improves the surface finish and alters the residual stresses generated during the AM process. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of different types of cutting fluids on the machined surface roughness and residual stresses of components produced through AM and conventional rolling processes of AISI 316L. A carbide tool was used during the milling process, and three types of cutting fluids were examined: dry machining, flooded cutting fluid, and cryogenic cooling. Residual stresses were evaluated using X-ray diffraction, while surface roughness was determined using an interferometer microscope. The surfaces were also analyzed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The best results for surface roughness and residual stress were achieved with the use of cryogenic cooling, with SEM revealing the presence of adhered material particles on the surface. A correlation was established between residual stress and surface kurtosis roughness, represented by the RKU parameter, and the increase in kurtosis could be associated with an inversely proportional increase in the parallel residual stress. This study provides valuable insights into the impact of the cutting fluid type on the quality of the surface and residual stress of machined components produced through AM and conventional rolling processes.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No additional data available.

References

  1. Deshpande YV, Andhare AB, Padole PM (2018) Experimental results on the performance of cryogenic treatment of tool and minimum quantity lubrication for machinability nel 718. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 40:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-017-0920-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Karthik GM, Kim ES, Sathiyamoorthi P et al (2021) Delayed deformation-induced martensite transformation and enhanced cryogenic tensile properties in laser additive manufactured 316L austenitic stainless steel. Addit Manuf 47:102314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bertolini R, Campagnolo A, Sorgato M et al (2022) Fatigue strength of LPBF Ti6Al4V machined under flood and cryogenic lubri-cooling conditions. Int J Fatigue 162:106973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yasa E, Mehmet G, Anıl A (2022) Tribological and mechanical behavior of AISI 316L lattice - supported structures produced by laser powder bed fusion. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1733–1748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08069-0

  5. Morettini G, Razavi SMJ, Zucca G (2019) Effects of build orientation on fatigue behavior of Ti-6Al-4V as-built specimens produced by direct metal laser sintering. Procedia Struct Integr 24:349–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2020.02.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Edin E, Svahn F, Åkerfeldt P et al (2022) Rapid method for comparative studies on stress relief heat treatment of additively manufactured 316L. Mater Sci Eng A 847:143313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.143313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu AS, Brown DW, Kumar M et al (2014) An experimental investigation into additive manufacturing-induced residual stresses in 316L stainless steel. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 45:6260–6270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-014-2549-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deshpande Y, Andhare A, Sahu NK (2017) Estimation of surface roughness using cutting parameters, force, sound, and vibration in turning of Inconel 718. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 39:5087–5096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-017-0819-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moritz J, Seidel A, Kopper M et al (2020) Hybrid manufacturing of titanium Ti-6Al-4V combining laser metal deposition and cryogenic milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107:2995–3009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05212-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Souflas T, Bikas H, Ghassempouri M et al (2022) A comparative study of dry and cryogenic milling for directed energy deposited IN718 components : effect on process and part quality. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 745–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08313-7

  11. Szczotkarz N, Mrugalski R, Maruda RW et al (2021) Cutting tool wear in turning 316L stainless steel in the conditions of minimized lubrication. Tribol Int 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106813

  12. Manimaran G, Pradeep Kumar M, Venkatasamy R (2015) Surface modifications in grinding AISI D3 steel using cryogenic cooling. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 37:1357–1363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-014-0241-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yap TC, El-Tayeb NSM, Von Brevern P (2013) Cutting forces, friction coefficient and surface roughness in machining Ti-5Al-4V-0.6Mo-0.4Fe using carbide tool K313 under low pressure liquid nitrogen. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 35:11–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-013-0001-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gurpur Vignesh K, Achar BP, Hebbale AM (2022) Correlation analysis of machining parameters against cutting forces during machining of 17-4 PHSS using cryogenic treated and untreated WC insert. Mater Today Proc 52:1639–1643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lai Z, Wang C, Zheng L et al (2020) Adaptability of AlTiN-based coated tools with green cutting technologies in sustainable machining of 316L stainless steel. Tribol Int 148:106300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Danish M, Gupta MK, Rubaiee S et al (2022) Environmental, technological and economical aspects of cryogenic assisted hard machining operation of inconel 718: a step towards green manufacturing. J Clean Prod 337:130483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao W, Ren F, Iqbal A et al (2020) Effect of liquid nitrogen cooling on surface integrity in cryogenic milling of Ti-6Al-4 V titanium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106:1497–1508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04721-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khanna N, Gandhi A, Nakum B, Srivastava A (2018) Optimization and analysis of surface roughness for INVAR-36 in end milling operations. Mater Today Proc 5:5281–5288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Arunprasath K, Thivagar A, Mathan P, Yuvanarasimman P (2022) Cryogenic turning of titanium alloys: machinability characteristics and environmental consequences. Mater Today Proc 66:749–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ravi S, Gurusamy P (2021) Materials Today : Proceedings Role of cryogenic machining : a sustainable manufacturing process. Mater Today Proc 37:316–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nimel Sworna Ross K, Manimaran G (2019) Effect of cryogenic coolant on machinability of difficult-to-machine Ni–Cr alloy using PVD-TiAlN coated WC tool. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 41:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1552-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Leadebal WV, de Melo ACA, de Oliveira AJ, Castro NA (2018) Effects of cryogenic cooling on the surface integrity in hard turning of AISI D6 steel. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-017-0922-6

  23. Kim DY, Kim DM, Park HW (2019) Numerical and experimental study of end-milling process of titanium alloy with a cryogenic internal coolant supply. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105:2957–2975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04425-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Veerappan G, Pritima D, Parthasarathy NR et al (2022) Materials Today : Proceedings Influence of cryogenic treatment on tool life , flank wear and surface roughness for machining nickel based super alloy-Haynes 282. Mater Today Proc 59:1571–1574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Salame C, Bejjani R (2022) A better understanding of the cryogenic environment and the effect of nozzle location on the machinability of low carbon steel. J Manuf Process 74:544–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ravi S, Gurusamy P (2021) Materials Today : Proceedings Cryogenic machining of AISI p20 steel under liquid nitrogen cooling. Mater Today Proc 37:806–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li J, Wang Y, Liu K et al (2023) Tough-brittle transition mechanism and specific cutting energy analysis during cryogenic machining of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. J Clean Prod 383:135533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang Y, Li J, Liu K et al (2022) Experiment and numerical study of chip formation mechanism during cryogenic machining of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Manuf Process 84:1246–1257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Patel T, Khanna N, Yadav S et al (2021) Machinability analysis of nickel-based superalloy Nimonic 90: a comparison between wet and LCO 2 as a cryogenic coolant. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113:3613–3628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06793-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ahmed F, Ahmad F, Kumaran ST et al (2023) Development of cryogenic assisted machining strategy to reduce the burr formation during micro-milling of ductile material. J Manuf Process 85:43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.11.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kundu S, Choudhuri B, Sen R (2022) CNC machinability study of AISI 316L & optimization of machining parameters using TLBO algorithm. Mater Today Proc 62:1218–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mou W, Zhu S (2020) Vibration, tool wear and surface roughness characteristics in turning of Inconel 718 alloy with ceramic insert under LN2 machining. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 42:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02438-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Khan MA, Husain S, Jaffery I et al (2022) Comparative analysis of tool wear progression of dry and cryogenic turning of titanium alloy Ti - 6Al - 4V under low , moderate and high tool wear conditions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1269–1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09196-y

  34. Sastry CC, Gokulakrishnan K, Hariharan P et al (2020) Investigation of boring on gunmetal in dry, wet and cryogenic conditions. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 42:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-2091-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kesavan J, Senthilkumar V, Dinesh S (2020) Materials Today : Proceedings Experimental and numerical investigations on machining of Hastelloy C276 under cryogenic condition. Mater Today Proc 27:2441–2444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu H, Wang C, Liu Z et al (2021) Numerical prediction of machining-induced surface residual stress for TC4 cryogenic turning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 114:131–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06805-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Agrawal C, Wadhwa J, Pitroda A et al (2021) Comprehensive analysis of tool wear, tool life, surface roughness, costing and carbon emissions in turning Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy: Cryogenic versus wet machining. Tribol Int 153:106597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hassan W, Farid MA, Tosi A et al (2021) The effect of printing parameters on sintered properties of extrusion-based additively manufactured stainless steel 316L parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 114:3057–3067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07047-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tang L, Magdysyuk OV, Jiang F et al (2022) Mechanical performance and deformation mechanisms at cryogenic temperatures of 316L stainless steel processed by laser powder bed fusion: In situ neutron diffraction. Scr Mater 218:114806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.114806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pal A, Chatha SS, Sidhu HS (2022) Assessing the lubrication performance of various vegetable oil-based nano-cutting fluids via eco-friendly MQL technique in drilling of AISI 321 stainless steel. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 44:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03442-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang H, Liu P, Chen X et al (2022) Mechanical properties and corrosion resistance characterization of a novel Co36Fe36Cr18Ni10 high-entropy alloy for bioimplants compared to 316L alloy. J Alloys Compd 906:163947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.163947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang C, Lin X, Wang L et al (2021) Cryogenic mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng A 815:141317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.141317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Davis R, Singh A, James M et al (2022) A comprehensive review on metallic implant biomaterials and their subtractive manufacturing. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. Bitelli G, Simone A, Girardi F, Lantieri C (2012) Laser scanning on road pavements: a new approach for characterizing surface texture. Sensors (Switzerland) 12:9110–9128. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120709110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Leach R (2014) Surface Topography Characterisation. In: In: Fundamental Principles of Engineering Nanometrology. Elsevier, pp 241–294

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Bertolini R, Lizzul L, Pezzato L et al (2019) Improving surface integrity and corrosion resistance of additive manufactured Ti6Al4V alloy by cryogenic machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104:2839–2850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04180-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhou JM, Bushlya V, Stahl JE (2012) An investigation of surface damage in the high speed turning of Inconel 718 with use of whisker reinforced ceramic tools. J Mater Process Technol 212:372–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.09.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Chimmat M, Srinivasan D, Infante V, Deus AM (2019) Understanding the Residual Stress in DMLS CoCrMo and using diffraction SS316L using X-ray diffraction. Procedia Struct Integr 14:746–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Simson T, Emmel A, Dwars A, Böhm J (2017) Residual stress measurements on AISI 316L samples manufactured by selective laser melting. Addit Manuf 17:183–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Uçak N, Çiçek A, Aslantas K (2022) Machinability of 3D printed metallic materials fabricated by selective laser melting and electron beam melting: A review. J Manuf Process 80:414–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.06.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Dong S, Xiao J, Hu X et al (2023) Deep transfer learning based on Bi-LSTM and attention for remaining useful life prediction of rolling bearing. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 230:108914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA (2016) The ASA’s statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. Am Stat 70:129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Brito LC, Gomes MC, de Oliveira D et al (2023) Vibration features for indirect monitoring of end micromilling process. Precis Eng 79:7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2022.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the VAS Technology for the residual stress measurements.

Code availability

This is not applicable.

Funding

The authors would like to thank the Sao Paulo Research Foundation-FAPESP (process numbers: 2020/10653-5 and 2020/09163-3) and Maua Institute of Technology, for the financial support to carry out this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Centro Universitário do Instituto Mauá de Tecnologia, Praça Mauá, 01, São Caetano do Sul, SP, 09580-900, Brazil

    Ed Claudio Bordinassi, Vanessa Seriacopi, Marcelo Otávio dos Santos, Nelson Wilson Paschoalinoto & Adalto de Farias

Authors
  1. Ed Claudio Bordinassi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vanessa Seriacopi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marcelo Otávio dos Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nelson Wilson Paschoalinoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Adalto de Farias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Éd Claudio Bordinassi: conceptualization, data curation, investigation, methodology, validation, writing—original draft, and supervision. Vanessa Seriacopi: conceptualization, data curation, investigation, methodology, validation, and writing—original draft. Marcelo Otávio dos Santos: data curation, methodology, and validation. Nelson Wilson Paschoalinoto: conceptualization, data curation, and methodology. Adalto de Farias: data curation, validation, and writing review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ed Claudio Bordinassi.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The authors conducted their work from research proposal to publication in line with best practices and codes of conduct of relevant professional bodies.

Consent to participate

The authors, Éd Claudio Bordinassi, Vanessa Seriacopi, Marcelo Otávio dos Santos, Nelson Wilson Paschoalinoto and Adalto de Farias, confirm their contributions and participation in the paper entitled “Effect of Cryogenic Cooling on Residual Stresses and Surface Finish of 316L During Hybrid Manufacturing.”

Consent to publish

The authors have obtained the necessary authority for publication of this paper and confirm and consent in order to publish in “The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.”

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

This manuscript was not be submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration. The submitted work is original and not have been published elsewhere in any form or language, partially or in full.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bordinassi, E.C., Seriacopi, V., dos Santos, M.O. et al. Effect of cryogenic cooling on residual stresses and surface finish of 316L during hybrid manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 129, 1489–1502 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12380-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12380-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation