Skip to main content
Log in

Study on surface defect formation mechanism in ultrasonic vibration-assisted grinding of SiCp/Al composites

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultrasonic vibration-assisted grinding (UVAG) is an effective method for high-quality and efficient processing of advanced composite materials. However, the material removal and defect formation mechanism of SiC particle-reinforced aluminum matrix (SiCp/Al) composites in UVAG processing are still unclear. This limits the application of UVAG in composite processing. In this work, a microstructure-based finite element model, in which the properties of SiC particle, Al matrix, and the interfacial layer between SiC particle and Al matrix are considered, has been developed in order to more accurately describe the deformation and failure behavior of SiCp/Al composites in the ultrasonic vibration-assisted grinding process. The influences of complex interactions between tool, particle, and matrix under different tool-workpiece contact modes on material removal and surface defect formation mechanism are analyzed based on the proposed model. Simulation results show that groove and pit defects are more likely to occur in the tool-workpiece continuous contact mode while voids and particle fractures often appear in the tool-workpiece intermittent contact mode. The validity of the proposed model is verified by the corresponding ultrasonic vibration-assisted scratching experiments in terms of surface morphology, defect characteristics, and scratching force. Experimental results are found to correspond well with the outcome of the simulation. The findings reported in this work provide a theoretical basis for exploring effective methods to reduce machining defects and improve the quality of machined surfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

UVAG:

Ultrasonic vibration-assisted grinding

SiCp/Al:

Silicon carbide particle-reinforced aluminum matrix composites

UVAM:

Ultrasonic vibration-assisted machining

CG:

Conventional grinding

RUVAS:

Rotary ultrasonic vibration-assisted scratch

\({v}_{s}\) :

Cutting speed

\(f\) :

Frequency of ultrasonic vibration

\(A\) :

Ultrasonic amplitude

\(\theta\) :

Top angle of the abrasive grain

\(\sigma\) :

Von Mises plastic equivalent stress

\(\overline\sigma\)  :

Stress triaxiality

\(\varepsilon\) :

Equivalent plastic strain

\(\dot{\varepsilon }\) :

Plastic strain rate

\({\dot{\varepsilon }}_{0}\) :

Reference strain rate

\({{\varepsilon }_{f}}^{pl}\) :

Critical equivalent plastic strain

\(\Delta {\overline{\varepsilon }}^{pl}\) :

Increment of equivalent plastic strain

T :

Temperature of material

T room :

Room temperature

T melt :

Melting temperature

D :

Damage parameter in J-C

a,b,n,c,m :

J-C strength model constants for the Al2024

d 1, d 2, d 3, d 4, d 5 :

J-C damage constants for the Al2024

\({\sigma }^{*}\) :

Normalized von Mises equivalent stress

\({\sigma }_{i}^{*}\) :

Normalized intact equivalent stress

\({\sigma }_{f}^{*}\)  :

Normalized fractured equivalent stress

\(\dot{\sigma }\) :

Actual von Mises equivalent stress

\({\sigma }_{\text{HEL}}\) :

Equivalent stress at the Hugoniot elastic limit

P :

Actual pressure

\({P}^{*}\) :

Normalized pressure

\({P}_{\text{HEL}}\) :

Pressure at the Hugoniot elastic limit

\({T}^{*}\) :

Normalized maximum tensile hydrostatic pressure

\(\dot{T}\) :

Maximum tensile pressure

\({\dot{\varepsilon }}^{*}\) :

Dimensionless strain rate

\({\overline{\varepsilon }}_{f}^{pl}(P)\) :

Equivalent plastic strain to fracture under constant pressure

\({D}^{*}\) :

Damage parameter in JH-2

\(\omega\) :

Damage initiation parameter

\({A}^{*}\),\({B}^{*}\),\({C}^{*}\),\(M\),\(N\),\({D}_{1}\),\({D}_{2}\) :

Material parameters of SiC for the JH-2 model

\({K}_{1}\),\({K}_{2}\),\({K}_{3}\) :

Constants of the JH-2 model

\(\rho\) :

Current density

\(\rho_0\)  :

Reference density

\({t}_{n}^{0}\),\({t}_{s}^{0}\),\({t}_{t}^{0}\) :

Peak values of the nominal stress

References

  1. Ren SB, Qu XH, Guo J, He XB, Qin ML, Shen XY (2009) Net-shape forming and properties of high volume fraction SiCp/Al composites. J Alloy Compd 484:256–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.04.074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sekhar R, Singh TP (2015) Mechanisms in turning of metal matrix composites: a review. J Mater Res Technol-JMRT 4:197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2014.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jagadeesh GV, Setti SG (2020) A review on micromechanical methods for evaluation of mechanical behavior of particulate reinforced metal matrix composites. J Mater Sci 55:9848–9882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04715-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou JK, Lu MM, Lin JQ, Zhou XQ, Guo MQ, Du YS (2022) Investigation of surface integrity transition of SiCp/Al composites based on specific cutting energy during ultrasonic elliptical vibration assisted cutting. J Manuf Process 79:654–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.04.067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Das DK, Mishra PC, Singh S, Thakur RK (2015) Tool wear in turning ceramic reinforced aluminum matrix composites-a review. J Compos Mater 49:2949–2961. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998314558955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu C, Gao L, Jiang XG, Xu WW, Liu SN, Yang T (2020) Analytical modeling of subsurface damage depth in machining of SiCp/Al composites. Int J Mech Sci 185:16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ge YF, Xu JH, Yang H, Luo SB, Fu YC (2008) Workpiece surface quality when ultra-precision turning of SiCp/Al composites. J Mater Process Technol 203:166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang ZC, Zhu LD, Zhang GX, Ni CB, Lin B (2020) Review of ultrasonic vibration-assisted machining in advanced materials. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2020.103594

  9. Huang C, Zhou M, Zhang HJ (2022) Investigations on the micro-interactions of grit-workpiece and forces prediction in ultrasonic vibration side grinding of optical glass. J Mater Process Technol 300:19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zahedi A, Tawakoli T, Akbari J (2015) Energy aspects and workpiece surface characteristics in ultrasonic-assisted cylindrical grinding of alumina–zirconia ceramics. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 90:16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar V, Singh H (2018) Regression analysis of surface roughness and micro-structural study in rotary ultrasonic drilling of BK7. Ceram Int 44:16819–16827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.06.117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang MH, Pang ZX, Jia YX, Shan CW (2022) Understanding the machining characteristic of plain weave ceramic matrix composite in ultrasonic-assisted grinding. Ceram Int 48:5557–5573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.11.100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao B, Liu CS, Zhu XS, Xu KW (2002) Research on the vibration cutting performance of particle reinforced metallic matrix composites SiCp/Al. J Mater Process Technol 129:380–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00696-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dong GJ, Zhang HJ, Zhou M, Zhang YJ (2013) Experimental investigation on ultrasonic vibration-assisted turning of SiCp/Al composites. Mater Manuf Process 28:999–1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2012.709338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bai W, Roy A, Sun RL, Silberschmidt VV (2019) Enhanced machinability of SiC-reinforced metal-matrix composite with hybrid turning. J Mater Process Technol 268:149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.01.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou J, Lu M, Lin J, Du Y (2021) Elliptic vibration assisted cutting of metal matrix composite reinforced by silicon carbide: an investigation of machining mechanisms and surface integrity. J Mater Res Technol-JMRT 15:1115–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.08.096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou M, Wang M, Dong GJ (2016) Experimental Investigation on Rotary Ultrasonic Face Grinding of SiCp/Al Composites. Mater Manuf Process 31:673–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2015.1025962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dong ZG, Zheng FF, Zhu XL, Kang RK, Zhang B, Liu ZQ (2017) Characterization of material removal in ultrasonically assisted grinding of SiCp/Al with high volume fraction. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:2827–2839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0676-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Feng PF, Liang GQ, Zhang JF (2014) Ultrasonic vibration-assisted scratch characteristics of silicon carbide-reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Ceram Int 40:10817–10823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.03.073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zha HT, Feng PF, Zhang JF, Yu DW, Wu ZJ (2018) Material removal mechanism in rotary ultrasonic machining of high-volume fraction SiCp/Al composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97:2099–2109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2075-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zheng W, Wang YJ, Zhou M, Wang Q, Ling L (2018) Material deformation and removal mechanism of SiCp/Al composites in ultrasonic vibration assisted scratch test. Ceram Int 44:15133–15144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.05.150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dandekar CR, Shin YC (2012) Modeling of machining of composite materials: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 57:102–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. Proceedings 7th International Symposium on Ballistics. The Hague 19–21:541–547

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zheng W, Qu D, Qiao GC (2021) Multi-phase modeling of SiC particle removal mechanism in ultrasonic vibration-assisted scratching of SiCp/Al composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113:535–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06675-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1985) Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 21:31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Teng X, Wierzbicki T (2006) Evaluation of six fracture models in high velocity perforation. Eng Fract Mech 73:1653–1678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yu WW, Chen J, Ming WW, An QL, Chen M (2021) Experimental and FEM study of cutting mechanism and damage behavior of ceramic particles in orthogonal cutting SiCp/Al composites. Ceram Int 47:7183–7194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson GR, Holmquist TJ (1994) An improved computational constitutive model for brittle materials. AIP Conf Proc 309:981–984. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.46199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Holmquist TJ, Johnson GR (2005) Characterization and evaluation of silicon carbide for high-velocity impact. J Appl Phys 97:093502. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1881798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zou ZM, Lee H (2017) A cohesive zone model taking account of the effect of through-thickness compression. Compos Pt A-Appl Sci Manuf 98:90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Su YS, Ouyang QB, Zhang WL, Li ZQ, Guo Q, Fan GL, Zhang D (2014) Composite structure modeling and mechanical behavior of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A-Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process 597:359–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu Q, Xu WX, Zhang LC (2019) Machining of particulate-reinforced metal matrix composites: an investigation into the chip formation and subsurface damage. J Mater Process Technol 274:116315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116315

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51975153).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Haotao Wang: conceptualization, simulation modeling, software, experimental work, writing (original draft preparation), reviewing, and editing.

Haijun Zhang: investigation, software, and writing (reviewing and editing).

Ming Zhou: conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision, and writing (reviewing and editing).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Zhang, H. & Zhou, M. Study on surface defect formation mechanism in ultrasonic vibration-assisted grinding of SiCp/Al composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 129, 375–397 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12253-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12253-9

Keywords

Navigation