Skip to main content
Log in

A novel simulation model of three-dimensional surface topography for five-axis CNC milling using bull-nose tool

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computer numerical control milling is a widely used method for machining free-form workpieces. Studies show that the surface topography of the workpiece has a significant correlation with its mechanical strength and dimensional accuracy. Furthermore, the surface topography is influenced by cutting parameters. The bull-nose tool, which adapts to curvature, is an affecting parameter in improving machining quality. In the present study, a novel three-dimensional surface topography simulation model was proposed. The model employs approximate surfaces to characterize the scallop, enabling analytical calculation of endpoints and boundaries for each scallop without the need to discretize the workpiece into 2D planes or an x–y grid. Subsequently, machining experiments were performed to validate the proposed simulation model. The results revealed that the proposed model could be used to effectively simulate surface topography and predict surface roughness. Finally, the effect of cutting parameters on surface topography and surface roughness was analyzed using the simulation model. And the recommendations were proposed for the selection of these cutting parameters. The developed model exhibits promising potential in engineering applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data and materials are fully available without restriction.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Oşan A, Bănică M, Năsui V (2018) Processing of convex complex surfaces with toroidal milling versus ball nose end mill[J]. MATEC Web Conf 178:01003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shivanna DM, Kiran MB, Kavitha SD (2014) Evaluation of 3D surface roughness parameters of EDM components using vision system[J]. Int Conf Adv Manuf Mater Eng (Icamme 2014) 5:2132–2141

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen W, Xie W, Huo D et al (2018) A novel 3D surface generation model for micro milling based on homogeneous matrix transformation and dynamic regenerative effect[J]. Int J Mech Sci 144:146–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen H, Jin F (2021) Surface topography prediction model for free-form surface milling under a dynamic system response[J]. J Phys: Conf Ser 2044(1):012140

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bo L, Yanlong C, Wenhua C et al (2017) Geometry simulation and evaluation of the surface topography in five-axis ball-end milling[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(5–8):1651–1667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li B, Cao Y, Ye X et al (2015) Multi-scale prediction of the geometrical deviations of the surface finished by five-axis ball-end milling[J]. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part B: J Eng Manuf 231(10):1685–1702

  7. Zhang J, Zhang S, Jiang D et al (2020) Surface topography model with considering corner radius and diameter of ball-nose end miller[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106(9):3975–3984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Muñoz-Escalona P, Maropoulos PG (2015) A geometrical model for surface roughness prediction when face milling Al 7075–T7351 with square insert tools[J]. J Manuf Syst 36:216–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yuan Y, Jing X, Ehmann KF et al (2018) Surface roughness modeling in micro end-milling[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(5):1655–1664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang D, Liu Z (2015) Surface plastic deformation and surface topography prediction in peripheral milling with variable pitch end mill[J]. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 91:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li H, Lai X, Li C et al (2008) Modelling and experimental analysis of the effects of tool wear, minimum chip thickness and micro tool geometry on the surface roughness in micro-end-milling[J]. J Micromech Microeng 18(2):025006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu X, Soshi M, Sahasrabudhe A et al (2005) A geometrical simulation system of ball end finish milling process and its application for the prediction of surface micro features[J]. J Manuf Sc Eng 128(1):74–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu J, Xu L, Geng Z et al (2020) 3D surface topography simulation and experiments for ball-end NC milling considering dynamic feedrate[J]. CIRP J Manuf Sc Technol 31:210–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun Y, Jia J, Xu J et al (2022) Path, feedrate and trajectory planning for free-form surface machining: a state-of-the-art review[J]. Chin J Aeronaut 35(8):12–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang HX, Zong WJ, Sun T et al (2010) Modification of three dimensional topography of the machined KDP crystal surface using wavelet analysis method[J]. Appl Surf Sci 256(16):5061–5068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shamina OB, Belous LA, Ogol II (2014) Research on the optimal cutting parameters for ball end finish milling process of complex surfaces[C]. Int Conf Mech Eng, Autom Control Syst (MEACS) 2014:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang L, Zheng ML, Zhang W et al (2022) A roughness calculation method based on milling topography simulation[J]. Surf Topogr-Metrol Prop 10(2):025029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kull Neto H, Diniz AE, Pederiva R (2016) Tool life and surface roughness in the milling of curved hardened-steel surfaces[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(9):2983–2995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu AP, Qu YX, Zhang DW et al (2003) Simulation and experimental investigation of the end milling process considering the cutter flexibility[J]. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(3):283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kasim MS, Hafiz MSA, Ghani JA et al (2019) Investigation of surface topology in ball nose end milling process of Inconel 718[J]. Wear 426:1318–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang X, Scott PJ, Whitehouse DJ et al (2007) Paradigm shifts in surface metrology. Part II. The current shift[J]. Proc R Soc A-Math Phys Eng Sci 463(2085):2071–2099

  22. Wang M, Xi LF, Du SC (2014) 3D surface form error evaluation using high definition metrology[J]. Precis Eng J Int Soc Precis Eng Nanotechnol 38(1):230–236

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kwon Y, Konada U, Tseng T-L (2016) A novel approach to predict surface roughness in machining operations using fuzzy set theory[J]. J Comput Des Eng 3(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chen XX, Zhao J, Dong YW et al (2013) Effects of inclination angles on geometrical features of machined surface in five-axis milling[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65(9–12):1721–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yao CF, Tan L, Yang P et al (2018) Effects of tool orientation and surface curvature on surface integrity in ball end milling of TC17[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(5–8):1699–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gdula M (2020) Empirical models for surface roughness and topography in 5-axis milling based on analysis of lead angle and curvature radius of sculptured surfaces[J]. Metals 10(7):932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bharathi Raja S, Baskar N (2012) Application of particle swarm optimization technique for achieving desired milled surface roughness in minimum machining time[J]. Exp Syst Appl 39(5):5982–5989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shao Y, Tan J, Lu J (2021) A Spatio-temporal fully convolutional recurrent neural network based surface topography prediction[J]. J Mech Eng 57(20):292–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Torta M, Albertelli P, Monno M (2020) Surface morphology prediction model for milling operations[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106(7–8):3189–3201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Layegh KSE, Lazoglu I (2017) 3D surface topography analysis in 5-axis ball-end milling[J]. CIRP Annals 66(1):133–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sun YW, Shi ZF, Guo Q et al (2022) A novel method to predict surface topography in robotic milling of directional plexiglas considering cutter dynamical displacement[J]. J Mater Process Technol 304:117545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liang X, Yao Z (2013) Dynamic-based simulation for machined surface topography in 5-axis ball-end milling[J]. Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao (Chin J Mech Eng) 49(6):171–178

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang R, Zhang S, Ge R et al (2021) Modified machined surface topography modeling in ball-end milling process[J]. Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Comput Integr Manuf Syst, CIMS 27(4):973–980

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dong Y (2018) Research on modeling and simulation of surface topography obtained by trochoidal milling mode with ball end milling cutter[J]. J Mech Eng 54:212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hao XL, Yue CX, Liu XL et al (2020) Modeling of convex surface topography in milling process[J]. Metals 10(9):1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Xu JT, Zhang H, Sun YW (2018) Swept surface-based approach to simulating surface topography in ball-end CNC milling[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(1–4):107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang WH, Tan G, Wan M, et al (2008) A new algorithm for the numerical simulation of machined surface topography in multiaxis ball-end milling[J]. J Manuf Sci Eng-Trans Asme 130(1). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2815337

  38. Shujuan L, Dong Y, Li Y et al (2019) Geometrical simulation and analysis of ball-end milling surface topography[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102(5):1885–1900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gao H, Shen H, Yu L et al (2022) Simulation study on surface topography and roughness in milling process of curved die[J]. Integr Ferroelectr 227(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Prat D, Fromentin G, Poulachon G et al (2016) Modeling and analysis of five-axis milling configurations and titanium alloy surface topography[J]. J Manuf Sci Eng-Trans Asme 138(6). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032083

  41. Buj-Corral I, Vivancos-Calvet J, Dominguez-Fernandez A (2012) Surface topography in ball-end milling processes as a function of feed per tooth and radial depth of cut[J]. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 53(1):151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang P, Zhang S, Li Z et al (2016) Tool path planning and milling surface simulation for vehicle rear bumper mold[J]. Adv Mech Eng 8(3):1687814016641569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Segonds S, Seitier P, Bordreuil C et al (2019) An analytical model taking feed rate effect into consideration for scallop height calculation in milling with torus-end cutter[J]. J Intell Manuf 30(4):1881–1893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu J, Qiu J, Ye H (2022) Torque optimization method of a 3-DOF redundant parallel manipulator based on actuator torque range[J]. J Mech Robot 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054618

  45. Wu J, Ye H, Yu G et al (2022) A novel dynamic evaluation method and its application to a 4-DOF parallel manipulator[J]. Mech Mach Theory 168:104627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wu J, Yu G, Gao Y et al (2018) Mechatronics modeling and vibration analysis of a 2-DOF parallel manipulator in a 5-DOF hybrid machine tool[J]. Mech Mach Theory 121:430–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work received financial support from the National Natural Science Foundations of China (Grant Nos. 51775445 and 52175435), Defense Industrial Technology Development Program (No. XXXX2018213A001), and Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi (Program Nos. 2016KTZDGY4-02 and 2019GY-064).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to design and implementation of the concept. Jieshi Dong: conceptualization, methodology, experimental design, writing—original draft preparation; Jinming He, Song Liu, and Neng Wan: investigation, experiment, data processing, and analysis; Zhiyong Chang: writing review and editing. All authors connected on previous versions of the manuscript and have read and approve the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiyong Chang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dong, J., Chang, Z., He, J. et al. A novel simulation model of three-dimensional surface topography for five-axis CNC milling using bull-nose tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 128, 5041–5060 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12239-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12239-7

Keywords

Navigation