Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction and examination of the impact of the raster angle on the orthotropic elastic response of 3D-printed objects using a novel homogenization strategy based on the real clustering of RVEs

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The distinct process of layer-by-layer 3D printing generates an anisotropic distribution of mechanical properties. The use of computational models to predict the mechanical properties of 3D-printed objects made by fused filament fabrication (FFF) has received little attention despite a large literature on experimental approaches. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the application of multi-scale computational models in order to achieve precise predictions of the mechanical properties of observed components. A numerical homogenization method is used in combination with clustering algorithms, notably the “K-means” algorithm, to adjust the predicted behavior of the parts to the actual properties resulting from this process as a function of the variation of the raster angle. This method analyzes samples’ internal structure at the micro- and mesoscales. K-means algorithms classify observations to create representative volume elements (RVEs) that match the reel morphologies of the interlayer cavities. The data is utilized to create micromechanical models that calculate effective orthotropic constants based on filament orientation; the derived constants are then used to develop macroscale numerical models that simulate the mechanical response of 3D-printed samples subjected to tensile stress. In summary, the findings suggest that employing the homogenization technique is a reliable approach for forecasting the elastic behavior of 3D-printed elements. Moreover, it is imperative to utilize existing models, such as homogenization utilizing Green’s functions or homogenization based on ideal geometry-material models, in order to obtain an initial approximation of the elastic response of 3D-printed components. Furthermore, the methodology employed in this study, which combines the homogenization process with intelligent clustering algorithms, effectively minimizes the error between numerical simulations and experimental findings. This, in turn, improves the development of precise predictive models that accurately represent the elastic properties of structures fabricated using FFF. This methodology has the potential to be implemented across all materials utilized in FFF manufacturing. This study presents trustworthy prediction laws that enable the designer to conduct a quicker iterative analysis and select the ideal printing process parameters based on FE analysis in order to create high-quality 3D FFF-printed components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The sets of data developed and/or examined through the present research are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. ISO/ASTM52900-15 (2015) Standard terminology for additive manufacturing–general principles–terminology. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  2. Motaparti KP (2016) Effect of build parameters on mechanical properties of ultem 9085 parts by fused deposition modeling. Missouri University of Science and Technology

    Google Scholar 

  3. Matlack M, Castle J, Taylor G, Wang X, Mason L, Leu M-C, Chandrashekhara K (2016) Investigation of ULTEM 1010 FDM sparse-build parts using design of experiments and numerical simulation. Proc Compos Adv Mater Expo 2016:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cao D, Malakooti S, Kulkarni VN, Ren Y, Lu H (2021) Nanoindentation measurement of core–skin interphase viscoelastic properties in a sandwich glass composite. Mech Time Depend Mater 25:353–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11043-020-09448-Y/METRICS

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang X, Xu T, de Andrade MJ, Rampalli I, Cao D, Haque M, Roy S, Baughman RH, Lu H (2021) The interfacial shear strength of carbon nanotube sheet modified carbon fiber composites. Springer, pp 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59542-5_4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Cao D, Malakooti S, Kulkarni VN, Ren Y, Liu Y, Nie X, Qian D, Griffith DT, Lu H (2022) The effect of resin uptake on the flexural properties of compression molded sandwich composites. Wind Energy 25:71–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/WE.2661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2009) Improving dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method. Mater Des 30:4243–4252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee P-H, Chung H, Lee SW, Yoo J, Ko J (2014) Dimensional accuracy in additive manufacturing processes. In: International manufacturing science and engineering conference. Am Soc Mech Eng:V001T04A045

  9. Ahn D, Kweon J-H, Kwon S, Song J, Lee S (2009) Representation of surface roughness in fused deposition modeling. J Mater Process Technol 209:5593–5600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boschetto A, Giordano V, Veniali F (2012) Modelling micro geometrical profiles in fused deposition process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 61:945–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Telea A, Jalba A (2011) Voxel-based assessment of printability of 3D shapes. In: International symposium on mathematical morphology and its applications to signal and image processing. Springer, pp 393–404

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nelaturi S, Shapiro V (2015) Representation and analysis of additively manufactured parts. Computer-Aided Design 67:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gonabadi H, Chen Y, Yadav A, Bull S (2022) Investigation of the effect of raster angle, build orientation, and infill density on the elastic response of 3D printed parts using finite element microstructural modeling and homogenization techniques. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 118:1485–1510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07940-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Letcher T, Waytashek M (2014) Material property testing of 3D-printed specimen in PLA on an entry-level 3D printer. In: ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, p V02AT02A014

  15. International A (2013) Standard test method for short-beam strength of polymer matrix composite materials and their laminates. ASTM International

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yu L, Cao Y, Yang JYH, Yang P (2022) Benchmarking clustering algorithms on estimating the number of cell types from single-cell RNA-sequencing data. Genome Biol 23:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Likas A, Vlassis N, Verbeek JJ (2003) The global k-means clustering algorithm. Pattern Recognit 36:451–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cerda-Avila SN, Medellín-Castillo HI, De Lange DF (2019) Analysis and numerical simulation of the structural performance of fused deposition modeling samples with variable infill values. J Eng Mater Technol Trans ASME 141. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041854/366891

  19. Liu X, Shapiro V (2016) Homogenization of material properties in additively manufactured structures. Computer-Aided Design 78:71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Monaldo E, Sciences SM-IJ of M (2021) Computational homogenization of 3D printed materials by a reduced order model. Elsevier

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Yao T, Zhang K, Deng Z, Design JY-M (2020) A novel generalized stress invariant-based strength model for inter-layer failure of FFF 3D printing PLA material. Elsevier

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Somireddy M, Design AC-M (2020) Anisotropic material behavior of 3D printed composite structures–material extrusion additive manufacturing. Elsevier

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Tang C, Liu J, Yang Y, Liu Y, Jiang S, Open WH-CPC (2020) Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties of 3D printed PLA lattice structures. Elsevier

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Lubombo C, Communications MH-MT (2018) undefined. Effect of infill patterns on the mechanical performance of lightweight 3D-printed cellular PLA parts. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  25. Aldin A, Qattawi A (2018) Investigating the effect of fused deposition modeling processing parameters using Taguchi design of experiment method. J Manuf Process 36:164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. International A (2007) Standard test method for flexural properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM International

    Google Scholar 

  27. ASTM A (2008) D638-08 standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. Plastics (I):D256–D3159

  28. International A (2012) ASTM D5379/D5379M-12-standard test method for shear properties of composite materials by the V-notched beam method. ASTM International West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  29. Torres J, Cotelo J, Karl J, Gordon AP (2015) Mechanical property optimization of FDM PLA in shear with multiple objectives. Jom 67:1183–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dhankhar P (2014) Homogenization fundamentals. IOSR J Eng 4:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bellehumeur C, Li L, Sun Q, Gu P (2004) Modeling of bond formation between polymer filaments in the fused deposition modeling process. J Manuf Process 6:170–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mutlag W, Ali S et al (2020) Feature extraction methods: a review. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1591/1/012028

  33. Nainggolan R, … RP-J of P, 2019. Improved the performance of the K-means cluster using the sum of squared error (SSE) optimized by using the elbow method. iopscience.iop.org

  34. Shutaywi M, Kachouie NN, Scarfone M (2021) Silhouette analysis for performance evaluation in machine learning with applications to clustering. mdpi.com. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23060759

  35. Sun Q, Rizvi GM, Bellehumeur CT, Gu P (2008) Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments. Rapid Prototyp J 14(2):72–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our colleagues from the Mechanical Engineering Laboratory, Faculty of Science and Technology (FST)—FEZ, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, who provided insight and expertise that greatly assisted the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamza Ait Benaissa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The specified work has never been published.

Consent for publication

All authors allowed the publication of the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ait Benaissa, H., Zaghar, H., Moujibi, N. et al. Prediction and examination of the impact of the raster angle on the orthotropic elastic response of 3D-printed objects using a novel homogenization strategy based on the real clustering of RVEs. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 129, 399–420 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12101-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12101-w

Keywords

Navigation