Skip to main content
Log in

Improving surface and dimensional quality with an additive manufacturing-based hybrid technique

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Additive manufacturing creates the desired models by adding layers on top of each other. Features such as production flexibility, rapid prototyping, and ease of usage of this technique as compared to traditional techniques play important roles in its widespread industrial applications. However, additive manufacturing also has several shortcomings including inadequate surface quality and dimensional accuracy. Hybrid manufacturing, on the other hand, is a method that emerged in an attempt to solve the problems associated with additive manufacturing. In this study, the deficiencies caused by fused deposition modelling were eliminated with the integration of machining. A hybrid manufacturing machine was produced by adding a cutting tool and DC motor to the 3D printer. All layers were first printed with the 3D printer and then processed with machining, and then the manufacturing was completed. Polylactic acid (PLA) and carbon fibre-reinforced PLA were produced using hybrid manufacturing. The effects of production temperature and layer thickness on surface quality and dimensional accuracy were investigated. As a result of the findings, the production advantages that hybrid manufacturing contributes to these parameters are emphasized. The positive effects of the hybrid approach on dimensional and surface quality have been demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Cao L, Xiao J, Kim JK, Zhang X (2023) Effect of post-process treatments on mechanical properties and surface characteristics of 3D printed short glass fiber reinforced PLA/TPU using the FDM process. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 41:135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Joseph TM, Kallingal A, Suresh AM, Mahapatra DK, Hasanin MS, Haponiuk J, Thomas S (2023) 3D printing of polylactic acid: recent advances and opportunities. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 125(3–4):1015–1035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10795-y

  3. Hao W, Liu Y, Zhou H, Chen H, Fang D (2018) Preparation and characterization of 3D printed continuous carbon fibre reinforced thermosetting composites. Polym Test 65:29–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Todoroki A, Oasada T, Mizutani Y, Suzuki Y, Ueda M, Matsuzaki R, Hirano Y (2020) Tensile property evaluations of 3D printed continuous carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites. Adv Compos Mater 29(2):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goh GD, Toh W, Yap YL, Ng TY, Yeong WY (2021) Additively manufactured continuous carbon fibre-reinforced thermoplastic for topology optimized unmanned aerial vehicle structures. Compos Part B Eng 216:108840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grguraš D, Kramar D (2017) Optimization of hybrid manufacturing for surface quality, material consumption, and productivity improvement. Stroj Vestn J Mech E 63(10):567–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li L, Haghighi A, Yang Y (2018) A novel 6-axis hybrid additive-subtractive manufacturing process: design and case studies. J Manuf Process 33:150–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ulutan D, Dewey MP (2017) Development of laser polishing as an auxiliary post-process to improve surface quality in Fused Deposition Modeling parts. ASME 2017 12th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference collocated with the JSME/ASME 2017 6th International Conference on Materials and Processing 4-8 June, Los Angeles, California

  9. Lavecchia F, Percoco G, Pei E, Galantucci LM (2018) Computer numerical controlled grinding and physical vapor deposition for fused deposition modelled workpieces. Adv Mater Sci Eng 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9037490

  10. Lee W-C, Wei C-C, Chung S-C (2014) Developing a hybrid rapid prototyping system using low-cost fused deposition modeling and five-axis machining. J Mater Process Technol 214(11):2366–2374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Del Sol I, Domínguez Calvo Á, Piñero D, Salguero J, Batista M (2019) Study of the FDM parameters of the abs parts in the surface quality after machining operations. Key Eng Mater 813:203–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boschetto A, Bottini L, Veniali F (2016) Finishing of fused deposition modeling parts by CNC machining. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 41:92–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pandey PM, Reddy NV, Dhande SG (2003) Improvement of surface finish by staircase machining in fused deposition modeling. J Mater Process Technol 132(1-3):323–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hur J, Lee K, Zhu-hu, Kim J (2002) Hybrid rapid prototyping system using machining and deposition. Comput Aided Des 34(10):741–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tezel T (2020) Comparison of hole quality of polyamide materials produced by traditional and additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Eng Pure Sci 32(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  16. Amanullah ANM, Murshiduzzamana ST, Khana R (2017) Design and development of a hybrid machine combining rapid prototyping and CNC milling operation. Procedia Eng 184:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo C, Liu X, Liu G (2021) Surface finishing of FDM-fabricated amorphous polyetheretherketone and its carbon-fibre-reinforced composite by dry milling. Polymers 13(13):2175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tezel T (2021) The effect of machining parameters on the surface quality of 3D printed and cast polyamide. Mach Sci Technol 25(5):703–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruni C, Gianangeli C, Mancia T, Greco L, Pieralisi M (2020) Improving dimensional and surface quality of additive manufactured parts. J Phys Conf Ser 1507(4):042003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Parandoush P, Zhang H, Lin D, Ye C (2019) Mechanical finishing of 3D printed continuous carbon fibre reınforced polymer composites via CNC machining. International Manufacturing Science and Engineering. ASME 2019 14th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference June 10-14, Erie, Pennsylvania

  21. Arnés-Urgellés P, Bayas J, Ramírez EA, Maldonado F, Helguero CG, Amaya JL (2021) Machinability study of polymeric parts fabricated by additive manufacturing under a dry milling process. In: da Silva LFM (ed) Materials Design and Applications III. Advanced Structured Materials, vol 149. Springer, pp 139–148

    Google Scholar 

  22. Venkatesh R, Kathiravan S, Prabhakaran R, Ramar M, Britto JJ, J., Rajakarunakaran, S. (2023) Experimental investigation on machinability of additive manufactured PLA and PETG polymers under dry turning process. In: Recent Advances in Materials Technologies, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sneha N, Balamurugan K (2022) Micro-drilling optimization study using RSM on PLA-bronze composite filament printed using FDM. IEEE 2nd Mysore Sub Section International Conference, Mysuru, India, 2022, pp. 1-5

  24. Mertkan İA (2022) Determination of production parameters of fibre-reinforced thermoplastics manufactured by additive manufacturing based on hybrid manufacturing. Akdeniz University, MSc

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Tezel and Mertkan collected the resources for the literature review and Kovan analysed the collected papers and wrote the first draft of the article. Tezel designed the experiment, Mertkan examined the experiment, Tezel and Kovan verified the data analyses, Tezel supervised, and Kovan reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tuğçe Tezel.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This chapter does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any authors. The authors acknowledge that the work is original and that all the relevant text from the literature has been appropriately cited.

Consent to participate

The authors agree to the authorship order.

Consent for publication

All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mertkan, İ.A., Tezel, T. & Kovan, V. Improving surface and dimensional quality with an additive manufacturing-based hybrid technique. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 128, 1957–1963 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12055-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12055-z

Keywords

Navigation