Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

From the development of low-cost filament to 3D printing ceramic parts obtained by fused filament fabrication

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cost of manufacturing a structural ceramic component is a direct function of production quantity. Small-quantity production, such as prototypes manufactured by conventional methods, leads to long production times and high unit costs. The advent of fused filament fabrication of ceramic (FFFC) technology has created an opportunity to reduce lead time and cost and produce complex-shaped bodies with tailored sized and controlled porosity in small-quantity production runs, which is an advantage over traditional methods of fabrication of ceramic products. In this work, we propose to study the feasibility of manufacturing a low-cost composite filament, for FFFC processing, based on micrometric alumina (Al2O3) powder and polylactic acid (PLA) polymer as a binder system without any additive. Three compositions with the ceramic-to-polymer ratios (by volume) were considered: 70% Al2O3/30% PLA, 60% Al2O3/40% PLA, and 50% Al2O3/50% PLA. For that, the customized technological chain is adapted. It consists of four principal steps: (i) grinding in a ball mill and drying the raw powders; (ii) extrusion into ceramic-polymer filament; (iii) printing of ceramic-polymer samples; and (iv) thermal debinding and sintering samples to obtain the ceramic product. The physical, microstructural, and mechanical properties of raw materials, composite filament, and green and sintering samples are investigated and the optimal composition is chosen dependent on both homogeneous repartition of the Al2O3 powder and the printability of filament. The 3D sintered material obtained by 60% Al2O3/40% PLA composite filament shows the best flexural strength value of 332 ± 21 MPa with a relative density of ~ 91%, which may be sufficient for several technical applications. Note that the 60% Al2O3/40% PLA filament composite can easily be used to print a complex geometry using a standard nozzle of 0.4 up to 0.8 and does not show signs of brittleness during the printing process allowing it to become a promising material for the FFFC process. Based on the results of this paper and previous studies, FFFC technology can be a technically feasible and economically viable process for manufacturing ceramic components under certain conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Matizamhuka WR (2018) Advanced ceramics—the new frontier in modern-day technology: Part I. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 118:757–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Somiya S (1991) A review of advanced technical ceramics. Mater Manuf Proc 6(2):365–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426919108934763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reza Rezaie H, Beigi Rizi H, Rezaei Khamseh M, Öchsner A (2020) 3D-printing technologies for dental material processing. In: A review on dental materials. Adv Struct Mater 123. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48931-1_6

  4. Hattali ML, Valette S, Ropital F, Mesrati N, Tréheux D (2012) Interfacial behaviour on Al2O3/HAYNES® 214™ joints fabricated by solid state bonding technique with Ni or Cu–Ni–Cu interlayers. J Eur Ceram Soc 32(10):2253–2265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sharma A, Babbar A, Tian Y et al (2022) Machining of ceramic materials: a state-of-the-art review. Int J Interact Des Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-022-01016-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma A, Kalsia M, Uppal AS, Babbar A, Dhawan V (2022) Machining of hard and brittle materials: a comprehensive review. Mat Today: Proc 50(5):1048–1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Klocke F (1997) Modern approaches for the production of ceramic components. J Eur Ceram Soc 17:457–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Olhero SM, Torres PMC, Mesquita-Guimarães J, Baltazar J, Pinho-da-Cruz J, Gouveia S (2022) Conventional versus additive manufacturing in the structural performance of dense alumina-zirconia ceramics: 20 years of research, challenges and future perspectives. J Manuf Process 77:838–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sova A, Okunkova A, Grigoriev S, Smurov I (2012) Velocity of the particles accelerated by a cold spray micronozzle: experimental measurements and numerical simulation. J Therm Spray Technol 22:75–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11666-012-9846-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gusarov AV, Grigoriev SN, Volosova MA, Okunkova AA (2018) On productivity of laser additive manufacturing. J Mater Proces Technol 261:213–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.05.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gmeiner R, Mitteramskogler G, Stampfl J, Boccaccini AR (2015) Stereolithographic ceramic manufacturing of high strength bioactive glass. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 12:38–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.12325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sing SL, Yeong WY, Wiria FE, Tay BY, Zhao Z, Zhao L, Tian Z, Yang S (2017) Direct selective laser sintering and melting of ceramics: a review. Rapid Prototyp J 23:611–623. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-11-2015-0178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grossin D, Montón A, Navarrete-Segado P, Özmen E, Urruth G, Maury F, Maury D, Frances C, Tourbin M, Lenormand P, Bertrand G (2021) A review of additive manufacturing of ceramics by powder bed selective laser processing (sintering/melting): calcium phosphate, silicon carbide, zirconia, alumina, and their composites. Open Ceram 5:100073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceram.2021.100073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Smurov I, Doubenskaia M, Grigoriev S et al (2012) Optical monitoring in laser cladding of Ti6Al4V. J Therm Spray Technol 21:1357–1362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11666-012-9808-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Khmyrov RS, Grigoriev SN, Okunkova AA, Gusarov AV (2014) On the possibility of selective laser melting of quartz glass. Phys Proc 56:345–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Finke B, Hesselbach J, Schütt A, Tidau M, Hampel B, Schilling M, Kwade A, Schilde C (2020) Influence of formulation parameters on the freeform extrusion process of ceramic pastes and resulting product properties. Addit Manuf 32:101005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.101005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maillard M, Chevalier J, Gremillard L, Baeza GP, Courtial EJ, Marion S, Garnier V (2022) Optimization of mechanical properties of robocast alumina parts through control of the paste rheology. J Eur Ceram Soc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Onagoruwa S, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A (2001) Fused deposition of ceramics (FDC) and composites. Sch Mech Mater Eng 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2114788

  19. Bellini A, Shor L, Guceri SI (2005) New developments in fused deposition modeling of ceramics. Rapid Prototyp J 11:214–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540510612901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Safai L, Cuellar JS, Smit G, Zadpoor AA (2019) A review of the fatigue behaviour of 3D printed polymers. Adv Manuf 28(87):97. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADDMA.2019.03.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Terekhina S, Tarasova T, Egorov S et al (2020) On the difference in material structure and fatigue properties of polyamide specimens produced by fused filament fabrication and selective laser sintering. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 111:93–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06026-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kariz M, Sernek M, Obucina M, Kuzman MK (2018) Effect of wood content in FDM filament on properties of 3D printed parts. Mater Today Commun 14:135–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Khatri B, Lappe K, Noetzel D, Pursche K, Hanemann T (2018) A 3D-printable polymer-metal soft-magnetic functional composite—development and characterization. Mater 11:189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Terekhina S, Egorov S, Tarasova T, Skornyakov I, Guillaumat L, Hattali ML (2022) In-nozzle impregnation of continuous textile flax fiber/polyamide 6 composite during FFF process. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 153:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cao D, Malakooti S, Kulkarni VN, Ren Y, Lu H (2021) Nanoindentation measurement of core–skin interphase viscoelastic properties in a sandwich glass composite. Mech Time-Depend Mater 25:353–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-020-09448-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cao D (2023) An investigation on surface coated continuous flax fiber reinforced natural sandwich composites by vacuum-assisted material extrusion process. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26091.41760. (ResearchGate: Preprint)

  27. Cao D (2023) Strength enhancement by polylactic-acid matrix modification of continuous carbon-fiber-reinforced composites by a material extrusion process. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12669.64480. (ResearchGate: Preprint)

  28. Cano S, Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Sapkota J, Spoerk M, Arbeiter F, Schuschnigg S, Holzer C, Kukla C (2019) Additive manufacturing of zirconia parts by fused filament fabrication and solvent debinding: selection of binder formulation. Add Manuf 26:117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Orlovska M, Chlup Z, Baca L, Janek M, Kitzmantel M (2020) Fracture and mechanical properties of lightweight alumina ceramics prepared by fused filament fabrication. J Eur Ceram Soc 40:4837–4843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.02.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zetamix (2022) Datasheet Alumina Zetamix Filament (4 July 2023). https://zetamix.fr/produit/filament-alumine/

  31. Mutsuddy BC, Ford RG (1995) Ceramic injection moulding. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  32. Spoerk M, Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Sapkota J, Schuschnigg S, Holzer C (2018) Effect of the printing bed temperature on the adhesion of parts produced by fused filament fabrication. Plast Rub Comp 47(1):17–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14658011.2017.1399531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pekin S, Bukowski J, Zangvil A (1998) A study on weight loss rate controlled binder removal from parts produced by FDC. In: Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, Texas

  34. Agarwala MK, van Weeren R, Bandyopadhyay A, Safari A, Danforth SC, Priedeman WR (1996) Filament feed materials for fused deposition processing of ceramics and metals, in: Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, Texas, United States of America

  35. Agarwala M, Jamalabad V, Langrana N, Safari A, Whalen P, Danforth S (1996) Structural quality of parts processed by fused deposition. Rapid Prototyp J 2:4–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Onagoruwa S, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A (2001) Fused deposition of ceramics (FDC) and composites. In: Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, Texas, United States of America

  37. Kukla C, Cano S, Kaylani D, Schuschnigg S, Holzer C, Gonzalez-Gutierrez J (2019) Debinding behaviour of feedstock for material extrusion additive manufacturing of zirconia. Powder Metall 62:196–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325899.2019.1616139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Abel J, Scheithauer U, Janics T, Hampel S, Cano S, Müller-köhn A, Günther A, Kukla C, Moritz T (2019) Fused filament fabrication (FFF) of metal-ceramic components. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3791/57693

  39. Rangarajan S, Qi G (2000) Powder processing, rheology, and mechanical properties of feedstock for fused deposition of Si3N4 ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 69:1663–1669

    Google Scholar 

  40. Li T, Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Raguž I, Holzer C, Li M, Cheng P, Kitzmantel M, Shi L, Huang L (2020) Material extrusion additively manufactured alumina monolithic structures to improve the efficiency of plasma-catalytic oxidation of toluene. Addit Manuf 101700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101700

  41. Nanoe (2020) Zetamix 3D printing filament. https://zetamix.fr/en/produit/zetamix-alumina-filament/. Accessed 11 Jan 2023

  42. The Virtual Foundry (2023) Ceramic Filaments. https://shop.thevirtualfoundry.com/collections/ceramic-filaments. Accessed 11 Jan 2023

  43. Smirnov A, Peretyagin P, Bartolomé JF (2019) J Eur Ceram Soc 39:3491–3497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bartolomé JF, Smirnov A, Kurland HD, Grabow J, Müller FA (2016) Sci Reports 6:20589

    Google Scholar 

  45. Smirnov A, Seleznev A, Solis W, Pristinskiy Y, Peretyagin P, Bartolomé JF (2019) Nanomaterials 9(10):1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Smirnov A, Podrabinnik PA, Babushkin NN, Kuznetsova EV, Pristinskiy YO, Khmyrov RS. Development of Al2O3 and PLA ceramic-polymer filament for 3D printing fused deposition modeling method. AIP Conf Proc 2467: 020047-1-020047-7. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0092881

  47. Auffray L, Gouge PA, Hattali ML (2021) Design of experiment analysis on tensile properties of PLA samples produced by fused filament fabrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08216-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. BS EN ISO 527–2: 2019 Plastics - determination of tensile properties - Part 2: Test conditions for moulding and extrusion plastics. https://www.iso.org/standard/85822.html

  49. DIN EN ISO 6872: 2019–01 Dentistry - Ceramic materials. https://www.iso.org/standard/59936.html

  50. Kirstein AF, Woolley RM (1967) Symmetrical bending of thin circular elastic plates on equally spaced point supports. J Res Natl Bur Stand Sect C 71:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  51. Leriche A, Cambier F, Hampshire S (2017) Sintering of ceramics. Refer Mod Mater Sci Mat Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.10288-7

  52. Terekhina S, Skornyakov I, Egorov S, Guillaumat L, Tarasova T, Hattali ML (2020) The effect of build orientation on both flexural quasi-static and fatigue behaviours of filament deposited PA6 polymer. Int J Fatigue 140:105825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sun Q, Rizvi GM, Bellehumeur CT, Gu P (2008) Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments. Rapid Prototyp J 14:72–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Bellehumeur C, Li L, Sun Q, Gu P (2004) Modeling of bond formation between polymer filaments in the fused deposition modeling process. J Manuf Process 6:170–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Damon J, Dietrich S (2019) Process porosity and mechanical performance of fused filament fabricated 316L stainless steel. Rapid Prototyp J 7:1319–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-01-2019-0002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sadaf M, Bragaglia M, Nanni F (2021) A simple route for additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel via fused filament fabrication. J Manuf Process 67:141–150

  57. Tosto C, Bragaglia NF, Recca G, Cicala G (2022) Fused filament fabrication of alumina/polymer filament for obtaining ceramic parts after debinding and sintering processes. Materials 15(20):7399. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15207399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Nötzel D, Hanemann T (2020) New feedstock system for fused filament fabrication of sintered alumina parts. Materials 13:4461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Gorjan L, Galusca C, Sami M, Sebastian T, Clemens F (2020) Effect of stearic acid on rheological properties and printability of ethylene vinyl acetate based feedstocks for fused filament fabrication of alumina. Addit Manuf 36:101391

    Google Scholar 

  60. Qunisat Y, Lartigue C, Brown CA, Hattali L (2017) Multi-scale surface characterization in additive manufacturing using CT advances on mechanics, design engineering and manufacturing. Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_28

  61. Iyer S, McIntosh J, Bandyopadhyay A, Langrana N, Safari A, Danforth SC, Clancy RB, Gasdaska C, Whalen PJ (2008) Microstructural characterization and mechanical properties of Si3N4 formed by fused deposition of ceramics. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 5:127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Danzer R, Harrer W, Supancic P, Lube T, Wang ZH, Borger A (2007) The ball on three balls test—strength and failure analysis of different materials. J Eur Ceram Soc 27:1481–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Truxová V, Šafka J, Sobotka J, Macháˇcek J, Ackermann M (2022) Alumina manufactured by fused filament fabrication: a comprehensive study of mechanical properties and porosity. Polym 14:991

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation under project 0707-2020-0034. This work was carried on the equipment of the Collective Use Center of MSTU “STANKIN” (project No. 075-15-2021-695).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Moscow State University of Technology “STANKIN”, 3-A Vadkovskiy Pereulok, 127055, Moscow, Russia

    Anton Smirnov, Tatiana Tarasova & Sergey Grigoriev

  2. Arts et Métiers, Campus Angers - Laboratory LAMPA, 2 Bd du Ronceray, 49035, Angers Cedex 1, France

    Svetlana Terekhina

  3. Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, FAST, 91405, Orsay, France

    Lamine Hattali

Authors
  1. Anton Smirnov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Svetlana Terekhina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tatiana Tarasova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lamine Hattali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sergey Grigoriev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A. Smirnov: investigation, data curation, software, conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision. S. Terekhina: methodology, writing—original draft preparation. T.V. Tarasova: investigation, methodology, writing—original draft, validation. M.L. Hattali: methodology, writing—original draft preparation, reviewing and editing. S.N. Grigoriev: validation, writing—reviewing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lamine Hattali.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smirnov, A., Terekhina, S., Tarasova, T. et al. From the development of low-cost filament to 3D printing ceramic parts obtained by fused filament fabrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 128, 511–529 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11849-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11849-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation