Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cloud-based 3D printing service allocation models for mass customization

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to easy access, faster production, and on-demand printing, the applications of 3D printing are proliferating and reaching the mass customization level where individuals can print their self-design products. Many service providers emerge and supply 3D printers to allow mass customization within their specific service areas. Along with the technological advancement, these distributed 3D printers can be integrated and shared via a cloud-based platform for the manufacture of customized products in a dynamic and cost-effective environment. However, the 3D printing service allocation is a key challenge for the platform, especially when customers have specific time requirements for production. This paper investigates a 3D printing service allocation problem with optimization-based and real-time allocation strategies. The workflow of 3D printing service allocation is first analyzed in a cloud-based platform. Subsequently, a binary integer linear programming model is developed to allocate the 3D printing services to tasks given global demand information. A real-time allocation model is then developed on a first-come-first-serve basis to match 3D printing services with tasks. The objective is to maximize the net revenue of the platform. Numerical studies are conducted to compare the performance of two proposed models. The results show that the optimization model can increase the profit by approximately 100% on average, which implies the optimization-based strategy is superior to the real-time strategy in a metropolitan city; and because of the penalty mechanism, the acceptance rate can be increased by 5%. The results also show that the operators can find the optimal ratio of supply and demand to maximize the net revenue of the platform through historical data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See https://www.knowledge-sourcing.com/report/3d-printing-market (accessed on March, 2022).

References

  1. Culmone C, Smit G, Breedveld P (2019) Additive manufacturing of medical instruments: a state-of-the-art review. Addit Manuf 27:461–473

    Google Scholar 

  2. Olsen TL, Tomlin B (2020) Industry 4.0: opportunities and challenges for operations management. M&Som-Manuf Serc Oper Manag 22(1):113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chia HN, Wu BM (2015) Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials. J Biol Eng 9:4

  4. Joshi SC, Sheikh AA (2015) 3D printing in aerospace and its long-term sustainability. Virtual Phys Prototyp 10(4):175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tay YWD, Panda B, Paul SC, Mohamed NAN, Tan MJ, Leong KF (2017) 3D printing trends in building and construction industry: a review. Virtual Phys Prototyp 12(3):261–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guo S, Choi T-M, Chung S-H (2022) Self-design fun: Should 3D printing be employed in mass customization operations? Eur J Oper Res 299(3):883–897

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Darwish LR, El-Wakad MT, Farag MM (2021) Towards sustainable industry 40: a green real-time IIoT multitask scheduling architecture for distributed 3D printing services. J Manuf Syst 61:196–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhong RY, Dai QY, Qu T, Hu GJ, Huang GQ (2013) RFID-enabled real-time manufacturing execution system for mass-customization production. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 29(2):283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cao DY, Malakooti S, Kulkarni VN, Ren Y, Lu HB (2021) Nanoindentation measurement of core-skin interphase viscoelastic properties in a sandwich glass composite. Mech Time-Dependent Mater 25(3):353–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang X, Xu T, de Andrade MJ, Rampalli I, Cao D, Haque M, Roy S, Baughman RH, Lu H (2021) The interfacial shear strength of carbon nanotube sheet modified carbon fiber composites. Challenges in mechanics of time dependent materials, vol 2. Springer, pp 25–32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Cao DY, Malakooti S, Kulkarni VN, Ren Y, Liu YJ, Nie X, Qian D, Griffith DT, Lu HB (2022) The effect of resin uptake on the flexural properties of compression molded sandwich composites. Wind Energy 25(1):71–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ning F, Cong W, Qiu J, Wei J, Wang S (2015) Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling. Compos Part B: Eng 80:369–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou L, Zhang L, Laili Y, Zhao C, Xiao Y (2018) Multi-task scheduling of distributed 3D printing services in cloud manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(9):3003–3017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G (2010) The internet of things: a survey. Comput Netw 54(15):2787–2805

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu X (2012) From cloud computing to cloud manufacturing. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 28(1):75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao H-A (2015) A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett 3:18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nayak A, Reyes Levalle R, Lee S, Nof SY (2016) Resource sharing in cyber-physical systems: modelling framework and case studies. Int J Prod Res 54(23):6969–6983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang K, Tan BQ, Zhong RY (2022) Multi-attribute negotiation mechanism for manufacturing service allocation in smart manufacturing. Adv Eng Inform 51:101523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kang K, Xu SX, Zhong RY, Tan BQ, Huang GQ (2022) Double auction-based manufacturing cloud service allocation in an industrial park. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 19(1):295–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cao Y, Wang SL, Kang L, Gao Y (2016) A TQCS-based service selection and scheduling strategy in cloud manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(1–4):235–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li W, Zhu C, Yang LT, Shu L, Ngai EC-H, Ma Y (2015) Subtask scheduling for distributed robots in cloud manufacturing. IEEE Syst J 11(2):941–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu Y, Xu X, Zhang L, Wang L, Zhong RY (2017) Workload-based multi-task scheduling in cloud manufacturing. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 45:3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu Y, Zhu F, Zhang L, Lui Y, Wang Z (2019) Scheduling of manufacturers based on chaos optimization algorithm in cloud manufacturing. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 58:13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang YF, Zhang G, Qu T, Liu Y, Zhong RY (2017) Analytical target cascading for optimal configuration of cloud manufacturing services. J Clean Prod 151:330–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Thekinen J, Panchal JH (2017) Resource allocation in cloud-based design and manufacturing: a mechanism design approach. J Manuf Syst 43:327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheng Y, Tao F, Xu L, Zhao DM (2018) Advanced manufacturing systems: supply-demand matching of manufacturing resource based on complex networks and Internet of Things. Enterp Inf Syst 12(7):780–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kang K, Zhong RY, Xu SX, Tan BQ, Wang L, Peng T (2020) Auction-based cloud service allocation and sharing for logistics product service system. J Clean Prod 278:123881

  28. Bouzary H, Chen FF (2018) Service optimal selection and composition in cloud manufacturing: a comprehensive survey. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(1–4):795–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu Y, Wang L, Wang XV, Xu X, Zhang L (2019) Scheduling in cloud manufacturing: state-of-the-art and research challenges. Int J Prod Res 57(15–16):4854–4879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mai J, Zhang L, Tao F, Ren L (2016) Customized production based on distributed 3D printing services in cloud manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84(1):71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Luo X, Zhang L, Ren L, Lali Y (2020) A dynamic and static data based matching method for cloud 3D printing. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 61:101858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu S, Zhang L, Zhang W, Shen W (2021) Game theory based multi-task scheduling of decentralized 3D printing services in cloud manufacturing. Neurocomputing 446:74–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhong RY, Kang K, Yu C, Zhang Y, Tao F, Bernard A (2022) A resource sharing approach for PSS-enabled additive manufacturing platform. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 39:414–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang Y, Huang GQ, Qu T, Ho O, Sun S (2011) Agent-based smart objects management system for real-time ubiquitous manufacturing. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 27(3):538–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wasserfall F, Hendrich N, Ahlers D, Zhang J (2020) Topology-aware routing of 3D-printed circuits. Addit Manuf 36:101523

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Environment and Conservation Fund (ECF)—Environmental Research, Technology Demonstration and Conference Projects 2021 (ECF project 128/2021), and ITF project (PRP/068/20LI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China

    Kai Kang, Bing Qing Tan & Ray Y. Zhong

Authors
  1. Kai Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bing Qing Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ray Y. Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Kai Kang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, and Writing—original draft. Bing Qing Tan: Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, and Writing—original draft. Ray Y. Zhong: Supervision, Project administration, and Writing—review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bing Qing Tan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, K., Tan, B.Q. & Zhong, R.Y. Cloud-based 3D printing service allocation models for mass customization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 126, 2129–2145 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11221-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11221-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation