Skip to main content
Log in

Research on prediction method of surface roughness in weak magnetorheological shear thickening fluid polishing

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A joint prediction method of “mathematical modeling and finite element calculation” is proposed to improve the prediction of machining quality in weak magnetorheological shear thickening fluid polishing of complex surfaces. The study proceeded in several steps. First, based on both impact energy model and material removal model, a numerical prediction model of surface roughness is established. Second, based on the multi-peak fitting method, the field-induced rheological properties of the polishing fluid are characterized and material properties of the flow field medium in the polishing zone are defined. Third, the numerical boundaries of polishing flow velocity and shear stress in the above prediction model are obtained. Fourth, the polishing experiments with parameters consistent with the above simulation model are conducted, and the initial surface roughness values are substituted into the above prediction model. The results show that the joint prediction method can effectively predict the machining quality of workpiece surface. The absolute error of Sa value of surface roughness is up to 10.6 nm, and the maximum relative error is 12.3%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang SJ, To S, Wang SJ, Zhu ZW (2015) A review of surface roughness generation in ultra-precision machining. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 91:76–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim DW, Burge JH (2010) Rigid conformal polishing tool using non-linear visco-elastic effect. Opt Express 18(3):2242–2257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Grover V, Singh AK (2018) Modelling of surface roughness in a new magnetorheological honing process for internal finishing of cylindrical workpieces. Int J Mech Sci 144:679–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zeng S, Blunt L (2014) Experimental investigation and analytical modelling of the effects of process parameters on material removal rate for bonnet polishing of cobalt chrome alloy. Precis Eng 38(2):348–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jain RK, Jain VK (1999) Simulation of surface generated in abrasive flow machining process. Robot Cimput Integr Manuf 15(5):403–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Misra A, Pandey PM, Dixit US (2017) Modeling and simulation of surface roughness in ultrasonic assisted magnetic abrasive finishing process. Int J Mech Sci 133:344–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Savio G, Meneghello R, Concheri G (2009) A surface roughness predictive model in deterministic polishing of ground glass moulds. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 49(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guo J et al (2020) Internal surface quality enhancement of selective laser melted Inconel 718 by abrasive flow machining. J Manuf Sci E-T ASME 142(10):1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alam Z, Jha S (2017) Modeling of surface roughness in ball end magnetorheological finishing (BEMRF) process. Wear 374–375:54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghosh G, Sidpara A, Bandyopadhyay PP (2020) Experimental and theoretical investigation into surface roughness and residual stress in magnetorheological finishing of OFHC copper. J Mater Process Tech 288:116899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang Y, Zhang Y, Feng Z (2016) Analyzing and improving surface texture by dual-rotation magnetorheological finishing. Appl Surf Sci 360:224–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arora K, Singh AK (2021) Theoretical and experimental investigation on surface roughness of straight bevel gears using a novel magnetorheological finishing process. Wear 476:203693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li M, Lyu B, Yuan J, Yao W, Zhou F, Zhong M (2016) Evolution and equivalent control law of surface roughness in shear-thickening polishing. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 108:113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Qian C, Tian YB, Fan ZH, Sun ZG, Ma Z (2022) Investigation on rheological characteristics of magnetorheological shear thickening fluids mixed with micro CBN abrasive particles Smart Mater. Struct 31:095004

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fan ZH, Tian YB, Zhou Q, Shi C (2020) A magnetic shear thickening media in magnetic field-assisted surface finishing. P I Mech Eng B-J Eng 234(6/7):1069–1072

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fan ZH, Tian YB, Zhou Q, Shi C (2020) Enhanced magnetic abrasive finishing of Ti–6Al–4V using shear thickening fluids additives. Precis Eng 64:300–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Srivastava M, Pandey PM, Kuldeep, Basheed GA, Pant RP (2021) Synthesis and characterization of the rheological behavior of MR fluid for polishing silicon wafer using double-disc chemical-assisted magneto-rheological finishing process. J Magn Magn Mater 534:168044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gürgen S, Sofuoğlu MA, Kuşhan MC (2019) Rheological compatibility of multi-phase shear thickening fluid with a phenomenological model. Smart Mater Struct 28(3):035027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang Y, Li D, Cui H, Yang J (2020) A new modified model for the rheological properties of magnetorheological fluids based on different magnetic field. J Magn Magn Mater 500:166377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D’Avino G, Maffettone PL (2015) Particle dynamics in viscoelastic liquids. J Non-Newton Fluid 215:80–104

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Michele J, Patzold R, Donis R (1977) Alignment and aggregation effects in suspensions of spheres in non-Newtonian media. Rheol Acta 16(3):317–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson SJ, Salem AJ, Fuller GG (1990) Dynamics of colloidal particles in sheared, non-Newtonian fluids. J Non-Newton Fluid 34(1):89–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pasquino R, Panariello D, Grizzuti N (2013) Migration and alignment of spherical particles in sheared viscoelastic suspensions. A quantitative determination of the flow-induced self-assembly kinetics. J Colloid Interf Sci 394:49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nguyen D (2020) Simulation and experimental study on polishing of spherical steel by non-Newtonian fluids. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 107:763–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang X, Kuhlenkötter B, Kneupner K (2005) An efficient method for solving the Signorini problem in the simulation of free-form surfaces produced by belt grinding. Int J Mach Tool Manu 45(6):641–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fu Y, Wang X, Gao H, Wei H, Li S (2016) Blade surface uniformity of blisk finished by abrasive flow machining. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 84(5–8):1725–1735

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ming Y, Huang X, Zhou D, Li X (2022) A novel Non-Newtonian fluid polishing technique for zirconia ceramics based on the weak magnetorheological strengthening thickening effect. Ceram Int 48(5):7192–7203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ming Y, Huang X, Zhou D, Ren Y (2022) Field-induced rheological characterization of nano/micro-scaled suspensions based on a multi-peak fitting method. Nanoscale Adv 4:2159–2170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ming Y, Huang XM, Zhou DD et al (2022) Rheological properties of magnetic field-assisted thickening fluid and high-efficiency spherical polishing of ZrO2 ceramics. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 121:1049–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou D, Huang X, Ming Y et al (2021) Material removal characteristics of magnetic-field enhanced shear thickening polishing technology. J Mater Res Tech 15:2697–2710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Haj M, Spelt J, Papini M et al (2013) Surface roughness and erosion rate of abrasive jet micro-machined channels: experiments and analytical model. Wear 303:138–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Slikkerveer P, Bouten P, Veld F et al (1998) Erosion and damage by sharp particles. Wear 217(2):237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sochi T (2014) The flow of Newtonian and power law fluids in elastic tubes. Int J Nonlin Mech 67:245–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Steller R, Iwko J (2017) New generalized Newtonian fluid models for quantitative description of complex viscous behavior in shear flows. Polym Eng Sci 28(8):1446–1455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li M, Lyu B, Yuan J, Dong C, Dai W (2015) Shear-thickening polishing method. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 94:88–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhao X, Ma L, Xu X (2020) Mode transition from adsorption removal to bombardment removal induced by nanoparticle-surface collisions in fluid jet polishing. Friction 9(5):1127–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported in part by the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, contract grant numbers: 51975203), Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2021JJ30113), and Science and Technology Innovation Project of Hunan Province (2021RC4069). Authors Yang Ming, Xiangming Huang, Cai Yunhui, and Zhou Dongdong have received research support from Company Hunan University, College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Yunhui, Cai, and Dongdong, Zhou. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Y. Ming, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiangming Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ming, Y., Huang, X., Cai, Y. et al. Research on prediction method of surface roughness in weak magnetorheological shear thickening fluid polishing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 124, 2659–2673 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10668-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10668-4

Keywords

Navigation