Skip to main content
Log in

Advanced finite element model for predicting surface integrity in high-speed turning of AA7075-T6 under dry and cryogenic conditions

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The overall quality of a component and its mechanical performance and reliability during all its life cycle depend on several characteristics. The choice of the material plays an important role in satisfying the requirements and usually it makes the difference between failed and not failed products; however, another significant impact in the material performances is characterised by the manufacturing process. Nowadays, the numerical simulation represents an important tool to quickly predict several scenarios depending on process parameters’ changes, leading to a more flexible manufacturing process and time–cost saving due to the reduced experimental tests. This work presents an innovative finite element model (FEM) of high-speed turning of one of the most used aluminium alloys in aerospace field, namely the AA7075-T6. The developed simulation tool allowed to better investigate the metallurgical phenomena triggered by the varying process parameters tested and the cooling conditions used during the machining tests. A physics-based model to simulate the material behaviour has been developed and implemented via subroutine within the FEM software. The predictive capability of the model has been validated through experimental and numerical comparison of cutting forces, maximum temperature and grain size changes. The developed 3D FE model is capable of including the effects of different cooling conditions during machining of the aluminium alloy AA7075-T6 on the surface integrity (e.g. the microstructure and the dislocation density variation), whilst evaluating further important manufacturing process variables as cutting forces and maximum temperature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The datasets and the developed codes are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Rotella G, Dillon OW, Umbrello D, Settineri L, Jawahir IS (2013) Finite element modeling of microstructural changes in turning of AA7075-T651 Alloy. J Manuf Process 15(1):87–95, ISSN 1526–6125

  2. Furumoto T, Abe S, Yamaguchi M et al (2021) Improving surface quality using laser scanning and machining strategy combining powder bed fusion and machining processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 117:3405–3413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Calamaz M, Coupard D, Nouari M et al (2011) Numerical analysis of chip formation and shear localisation processes in machining the Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52:887–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2789-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bobbili R, Madhu V (2018) A modified Johnson-Cook model for FeCoNiCr high entropy alloy over a wide range of strain rates. Mater Lett 218:103–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.01.163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alitavoli M, Darvizeh A, Moghaddam M, Parghou P, Rajabiehfard R (2018) Numerical modeling based on coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian approach and experimental investigation of water jet spot welding process. Thin-Walled Structures 127:617–628, ISSN 0263–8231, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.02.005

  6. Mali RA, Agrahari MD, Gupta TVK (2020) FE based simulation and experimental validation of forces in dry turning of aluminium 7075. Materials Today: proceedings 7(9):2569–2573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Parida AK, Rao PV, Ghosh S (2020) Influence of cutting speed and nose radius in the machining of Al-6061: FEM and experimental validation. Mater Today: Proc 7(9):2569–2573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.10.142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta MK, Korkmaz ME, Sarıkaya M, Krolczyk GM, Günay M, Wojciechowski S (2022) Cutting forces and temperature measurements in cryogenic assisted turning of AA2024-T351 alloy: an experimentally validated simulation approach. Measurement 188:110594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jafarian F, Masoudi S, Soleimani H, Umbrello D (2018) Experimental and numerical investigation of thermal loads in Inconel 718 machining. Mater Manuf Processes 33(9):1020–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Arısoy YM, Guo C, Kaftanoğlu B, Özel T (2016) Investigations on microstructural changes in machining of Inconel 100 alloy using face turning experiments and 3D finite element simulations. Int J Mech Sci 107:80–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lotfi M, Amini S, Akbari J (2020) Surface integrity and microstructure changes in 3D elliptical ultrasonic assisted turning of Ti-6Al-4V: FEM and experimental examination. Tribol Int 151:106492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Imbrogno S, Rotella G, Rinaldi S (2020) Surface and subsurface modifications of AA7075-T6 induced by dry and cryogenic high speed machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107:905–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma K, Wen H, Hu T, Topping TD, Isheim D, Seidman DN, Lavernia EJ, Schoenung JM (2014) Mechanical behavior and strengthening mechanisms in ultrafine grain precipitation-strengthened aluminum alloy. Acta Mater 61:141–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dixit M, Mishra RS, Sankaran KK (2008) Structure–property correlations in Al 7050 and Al 7055 high-strength aluminum alloys. Mater Sci Eng, A 478:163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao YH, Liao XZ, Jin Z, Valiev RZ, Zhu YT (2004) Microstructures and mechanical properties of ultrafine grained 7075 Al alloy processed by ECAP and their evolutions during annealing. Acta Mater 52:4589–4599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kocks UF (1966) A statistical theory of flow stress and work-hardening. Phil Mag 13:541–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Melkote SN, Liu R, Zelaia PF, Marusich T (2015) A physically based constitutive model for simulation of segmented chip formation in orthogonal cutting of commercially pure titanium. CIRP Ann 64:65–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sabirov I, Murashkin MY, Valiev RZ (2013) Nanostructured aluminium alloys produced by severe plastic deformation: new horizons in development. Mater Sci Eng, A 560:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Topping TD, Ahn B, Li Y, Nutt SR, Lavernia EJ (2012) Influence of process parameters on the mechanical behavior of an ultrafine-grained Al alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 43:505–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gubicza J, Schiller I, Chinh NQ, Illy J, Horita Z, Langdon TG (2007) The effect of severe plastic deformation on precipitation in supersaturated Al–Zn–Mg alloys. Mater Sci Eng, A 461:77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Frost H, Ashby M (1977) Deformation-mechanism maps for pure iron, two austenitic stainless steels and a low-alloy ferritic steel. In: Jaffee RI, Wilcox BA (eds) Fundamental aspects of structural alloy design. Plenum Press, pp 26–65

    Google Scholar 

  22. Conrad H (1970) The athermal component of the flow stress in crystalline solids. Mater Sci Eng A 6:265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Arzt E. Size effects in materials due to microstructural and dimensional constraints: a comparative review. Acta Materialia, 46 (16): 5611–5626

  24. SeegerA (1956) The mechanism of glide and work hardening in FCC and HCP metals. In: Fisher, J., Johnston, W.G., Thomson, R., Vreeland, T.J. (Eds.), Dislocations and mechanical properties of crystals, pp. 243–329.

  25. Bergström Y (1983) The plastic deformation of metals - a dislocation model and its applicability. Reviews on powder metallurgy and physical ceramics 2(3):79–265

    Google Scholar 

  26. Holt D (1970) Dislocation cell formation in metals. J Appl Phys 41:3197–3201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Johnson TL, Feltner CE (1970) Grain size effects in the strain hardening of polycrystals. Metall Mater Trans B 1:1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lubarda AV, On atomic disregistry, misfit energy, and the Peierls stress of a crystalline dislocation, The Montenegrin Academy of Sciences and Arts Proceedings of the Section of Natural Sciences, 17, 2007

  29. Takeuchi S (2001) The mechanism of the inverse Hall-Petch relation of nanocrystals. Scripta Mater 44(8–9):1483–1487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Scattergood RO, Kock CC (1992) A modified model for Hall-Petch behavior in nanocrystalline materials. Scr Metall Mater 27:1195–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Thomas GJ, Siegel RW, Eastman JA (1990) Grain boundaries in nanophase palladium: high resolution electron microscopy and image simulation. Scr Metall Mater 24:201–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hallberg H, Wallin M, Ristinmaa M (2010) Modelling of continuous dynamic recrystallization in commercial-purity aluminum. Mater Sci Eng, A 527:1126–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Quan GZ, Mao YP, Li GS, Lv WQ, Wang Y, Zhou J (2012) A characterization for the dynamic recrystallization kinetics of as-extruded 7075 aluminum alloy based on true stress–strain curves. Comput Mater Sci 55:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shi C, Mao W, Chen XG (2013) Evolution of activation energy during hot deformation of AA7150 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng, A 571:83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Caillard D, Martin JL (2003) Thermally activated mechanisms in crystal plasticity. Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  36. Frost H, Ashby M (1982) Deformation-mechanism maps - the plasticity and creep of metals and ceramics. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nicolas M, Deschamps A (2003) Precipitate microstructures and resulting properties of Al-Zn-Mg metal inert gas–weld heat-affected zones. Metall Mater Trans A 35:1437–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ryen O, Nijs O, Sjolander E, Holmedal B, Ekstrom HE, Nes E (2006) Strengthening mechanisms in solid solution aluminum alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 37:1999–2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Astakhov VP, Joksch S (2012) Metalworking fluids (MWFs) for cutting and grinding – fundamentals and recent advances: 147–151. UK, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, p 1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Pušavec F, Lu T, Courbon C, Rech J, Aljancic U, Kopac J, Jawahir IS (2016) Analysis of the influence of nitrogen phase and surface heat transfer coefficient on cryogenic machining performance. J Mater Process Technol 233:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bordin A, Imbrogno S, Rotella G, Bruschi S, Ghiotti A, Umbrello D (2015) Finite element simulation of semi-finishing turning of electron beam melted Ti6Al4V under dry and cryogenic cooling Procedia CIRP, 31:551–556

  42. Özel T (2006) The influence of friction models on finite element simulations of machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:518–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Arrazola PJ, Ӧzel T (2010) Investigations on the effects of friction modeling in finite element simulation of machining. Int J Mech Sci 52:31–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cabanettes F, Rolland J, Dumont F, Rech J, Dimkovski Z (2016) Influence of minimum quantity lubrication on friction characterizing tool-aluminum alloy contact. J Tribol 138:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors contributed to the study conception and design. The development of the numerical model, implementation and analysis were performed by Stano Imbrogno. The manuscript was written by Stano Imbrogno and Giovanna Rotella. Antonio Del Prete reviewed and edited the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stano Imbrogno.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The manuscript is approved by all the authors for publication; all the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imbrogno, S., Rotella, G. & Del Prete, A. Advanced finite element model for predicting surface integrity in high-speed turning of AA7075-T6 under dry and cryogenic conditions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 124, 1735–1749 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10531-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10531-6

Keywords

Navigation