Skip to main content
Log in

Flank wear prediction using spatial binary properties and artificial neural network in face milling of Inconel 718

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Machining of Inconel 718 causes rapid tool failure, which affects the tooling cost and dimension tolerance of the components. Literature attributed flank wear as the dominant failure criterion that determines tool life during the milling operation. Flank wear width (VB) can be measured using digital microscopes or predicted in-process by a machine vision-based tool condition monitoring (MV-TCM) system. In MV-TCM, geometric and textural features are extracted from the flank wear region to represent VB progression. However, the leading cutting edge, where flank wear is measured, experiences progressive chipping and built-up edge when machining Inconel 718. These failure modes distract pixel distribution and luminosity, creating complex flank wear features on the leading cutting edge. Nevertheless, the wear region extracted from the side cutting edge shows a consistent change in features that can be used to predict flank wear progression under such failure modes. In addition, the scale-invariant fractal dimension can complement the geometric parameters, improving the reliability of features used to predict flank wear. This paper presents a multi-layer perceptron neural network (MLPNN) that was trained using a synergy of geometric and fractal features extracted from the side cutting edge of square inserts to predict flank wear progression during face milling of Inconel 718. The MLPNN shows an accuracy of 95.5% and a mean absolute percentage error of 1.099% during MV-TCM. The paper shows the potential of applying an in-process MV-TCM expedited by spatial binary features to estimate flank wear progression when milling Inconel 718.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Polvorosa R, Suárez A, López de Lacalle L.N, Cerrillo I, Wretland A, Veiga F (2017) Tool wear on nickel alloys with different coolant pressures: Comparison of Alloy 718 and Waspaloy. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 26: 44-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.01.012

  2. Devillez A, Schneider F, Dominiak S, Dudzinski D, Larrouquere D (2007) Cutting forces and wear in dry machining of Inconel 718 with coated carbide tools. Wear 262(7–8):931–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2006.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson M, Patwa R, Shin YC (2006) Laser-assisted machining of Inconel 718 with an economic analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(14):1879–1891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lins RG, Guerreiro B, Marques De Araujo PR, Schmitt R (2020) In-process tool wear measurement system based on image analysis for CNC drilling machines. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 69(8):5579–5588. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2019.2961572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu X, Liu Y, Zhou X, Mou A (2019) Automatic identification of tool wear based on convolutional neural network in face milling process. Sensors (Switzerland) 19(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19183817

  6. Peng R, Pang H, Jiang H, Hu Y (2020) Study of Tool Wear Monitoring Using Machine Vision. Autom Control Comput Sci 54(3):259–270. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411620030062

  7. Zhu K (2022) Machine Vision Based Smart Machining System Monitoring. 267–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87878-8_8

  8. Kamdani K, Hasan S, Farid A, Ashaary IA, Lajis A, Rahim EA (2019) Study on tool wear and wear mechanisms of end milling Nickel-based alloy. Jurnal Tribologi 21: 82-92. https://jurnaltribologi.mytribos.org/v21/JT-21-82-92

  9. Duan G, Chen YW, Sukegawa T (2010) Automatic optical flank wear measurement of microdrills using level set for cutting plane segmentation. Mach Vis Appl 21(5):667–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-010-0259-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) - MATLAB adapthisteq. https://www.mathworks.com/help/images/ref/adapthisteq.html. Accessed 12 Feb 2022

  11. Campos GFC, Mastelini SM, Aguiar GJ, Mantovani RG, de Melo LF, Barbon S (2019) Machine learning hyperparameter selection for Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization. Eurasip J Image Video Process 1:2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13640-019-0445-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kipli K et al (2018) Morphological and Otsu’s thresholding-based retinal blood vessel segmentation for detection of retinopathy. Int J Eng Technol 7(3):16–20. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.18.16665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiong G, Liu J, Avila A (2011) Cutting tool wear measurement by using active contour model based image processing. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation. ICMA 2011, pp 670–675. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMA.2011.5985741

  14. Sulong G, Abdulaali H, Hassan S (2015) Edge detection algorithms VS-active contour for sketch matching: comparative study. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 11(7):759–764. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.11.2038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thakre AA, Lad AV, Mala K (2019) Measurements of Tool wear parameters using machine vision system. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1876489

  16. Castejón M, Alegre E, Barreiro J, Hernández LK (2007) On-line tool wear monitoring using geometric descriptors from digital images. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(12–13):1847–1853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Prasad KN, Ramamoorthy B (2001) Tool wear evaluation by stereo vision and prediction by artificial neural network. J Mater Process Technol 112(1):43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00896-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Loizou J, Tian W, Robertson J, Camelio J (2015) Automated wear characterization for broaching tools based on machine vision systems. J Manuf Syst 37:558–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng G, Zhao J, Li A, Cui X, Zhou Y (2013) Failure mechanisms of graded ceramic tool in ultra high speed dry milling of Inconel 718. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 14(6):943–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-013-0124-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kerr D, Pengilley J, Garwood R (2006) Assessment and visualisation of machine tool wear using computer vision. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28(7–8):781–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2420-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Basirat R, Goshtasbi K, Ahmadi M (2019) Determination of the fractal dimension of the fracture network system using image processing technique. Fractal Fract 3(2):1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract3020017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moldovan OG, Dzitac S, Moga I, Vesselenyi T, Dzitac I (2017) Tool-wear analysis using image processing of the tool flank. Symmetry (Basel) 9(12):1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9120296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmitt R, Cai Y, Pavim A (2011) Machine Vision System for Inspecting Flank Wear on Cutting Tools. Proc. of Int. Conf. on Advances in Communication and Information Technology 2011. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.671.8511&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  24. ISO 8688-1 : 1989 (E) Tool life testing in milling - Part 1 : Face milling. International Organization for Standardization.

  25. Kaya B, Oysu C, Ertunc HM (2011) Advances in Engineering Software Force-torque based on-line tool wear estimation system for CNC milling of Inconel 718 using neural networks. Adv Eng Softw 42(3):76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2010.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kasim MS, Che Haron CH, Ghani JA, Sulaiman MA, Yazid MZA (2013) Wear mechanism and notch wear location prediction model in ball nose end milling of Inconel 718. Wear 302(1–2):1171–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2012.12.040

  27. Reza AM (2004) Realization of the contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) for real-time image enhancement. J VLSI Signal Process Syst Signal Image Video Technol 38(1):35–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VLSI.0000028532.53893.82

  28. Sreedhar K (2012) Enhancement of images using morphological transformations. Int J Comput Sci Inf Technol 4(1):33–50. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijcsit.2012.4103

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Landini G, Randell DA, Fouad S, Galton A (2017) Automatic thresholding from the gradients of region boundaries. J Microsc 265(2):185–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ma X, Li B, Zhang Y, Yan M (2012) The Canny edge detection and its improvement. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol 7530. LNAI, pp 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33478-8_7

  31. Shanmugavadivu P, Sivakumar V (2012) Fractal dimension based texture analysis of digital images. Procedia Engineering 38:2981–2986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu J, Jin X, Mi S, Tang J (2020) An effective method to compute the box-counting dimension based on the mathematical definition and intervals. Results Eng 6(December 2019):100106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2020.100106

  33. Arif J, Chaudhuri NR, Ray S, Chaudhuri B (2009) Online Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm for neural network based estimation and control of power systems. Proc Int Jt Conf Neural Networks 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2009.5179071

  34. Huang W et al (2021) Tool wear in ultrasonic vibration–assisted drilling of CFRP: a comparison with conventional drilling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1809–1820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07198-w

  35. Hao Z, Gao D, Fan Y, Han R (2011) New observations on tool wear mechanism in dry machining Inconel718. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(12):973–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.08.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the conceptual idea of the manuscript. Materials preparation was done by Dr Chin Seong Lim. Data collection and analysis was performed by Mr. Tiyamike Banda and Dr Veronica Lestari Jauw. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Mr. Tiyamike Banda and all authors commented on the previous versions. All authors read and finally approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chin Seong Lim.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 11
figure 11

Training states of MLPNN-5

Fig. 12
figure 12

Regression analysis of MLPNN-5 during training, validation, and testing

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Banda, T., Jauw, V., Li, C. et al. Flank wear prediction using spatial binary properties and artificial neural network in face milling of Inconel 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120, 4387–4401 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09039-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09039-w

Keywords

Navigation