Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimal design of blank thickness in superplastic AZ31 alloy to decrease forming time and product weight

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Superplastic forming has drawn growing interest from both automotive and aeronautical fields. It allows to decrease the weight of the product by eliminating fasteners because it can be used to form components with complex shapes that are very close to that of the final product; it can be considered a near-net-shape forming process. This work shows the optimal design of the thicknesses of a blank in AZ31 superplastic magnesium-based alloy to form a complex-shaped product. The adopted optimization method changed a set of geometric parameters of the blank to find the values that make as uniform as possible the final distribution of the product thicknesses. This method led to a blank with a variable thickness. The design was assisted by finite element analysis. The optimized process allowed to obtain, if it is compared to the same superplastic forming process on a blank with a constant thickness, (i) a final product characterized by a more uniform thickness distribution, (ii) a reduction of forming time, and (iii) a reduction of the product weight. It was carried out an experimental activity too that confirmed the convenience of adopting a blank with a variable thickness on which to carry out the forming process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Pilling J, Ridley N (1989) Superplasticity in Cristalline Solids. CRC Press, United States, The Institute of Metals

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pearce R (1989) Superplasticity. Ag Lect 168:1.1-1.24

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ridley N (2011) Metals for superplastic forming, in: Superplastic forming of advanced metallic materials. In: Giuliano G (ed) Superplastic forming of advanced metallic materials, Cambridge, UK, Woodhead Publishing Limited, pp. 3–33, 2011

  4. Hamilton CH (1989) Superplasticity. Ag Lect 168:2.1-2.23

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boissiere R, Terzi S, Blandin JJ, Salvo L (2008) Quick-plastic forming: similarities and differences with super-plastic forming. 6th EUROSPF Conference, Carcassonne, France, 3–5 September

  6. Bonet J, Wood RD, Collins R (1994) Pressure control algorithms for the numerical simulation of superplastic forming. Int J Mech Sci 36(4):297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamilton CH, Ghosh AK (1988) Superplastic sheet forming. In: Metals Handbook, Vol. 14, ASM, Metals Park, p.852–873

  8. Giuliano G, Polini W (2020) Influence of blank variable thickness on the material formability in hot gas sheet metal forming process. Manuf Lett 24:72–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Akkus N, Suzuki K, Kawahara M, Nishimura H (1999) Influence of performing on the final thickness distribution of the superplastically deformed domes. Mater Sci Forum 304–306:759–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Luckey G, Friedman P, Weinmann K (2009) Design and experimental validation of a two-stage superplastic forming die. J Mater Process Technol 209:2152–2160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Giuliano G, Corrado A, Polini W (2018) Influence of multiphase forming approach on the thickness uniformity of components from superplastic PbSn60 alloy. Manuf Lett 18:16–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim YH, Lee JM, Hong SS (2001) Optimal design of superplastic forming processes. J Mater Process Technol 112(2–3):166–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang A, Lowe A, Cardew-Hill MJ (2001) Experimental validation of sheet thickness optimization for superplastic forming of engineering structures. J Mater Process Technol 112(1):136–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dutta A (2004) Thickness-profiling of initial blank for superplastic forming of uniformly thick domes. Mater Sci Eng 371A(1–2):79–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grimes R (2011) Superplastic forming of magnesium alloy. In: Giuliano G (ed) Superplastic forming of advanced metallic materials. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, UK, pp 304–326

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Jovane F (1968) An approximate analysis of the superplastic forming of a thin circular diaphragm. Int J Mech Sci 10:403–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Enikeev FU, Kruglov AA (1995) An analysis of the superplastic forming of a thin circular diaphragm. Int J Mech Sci 37:473–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Giuliano G, Franchitti S (2007) On the evaluation of superplastic characteristics using FEM. Int J Mach Tool Manu 47:471–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Giovinco G, Giuliano G, Testa G (2010) Forming apparatus to investigate the effect of temperature on the superplastic behaviour of alloys. AIP Conf Proc 1252:304–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Giuliano G, Corrado A, Polini W (2021) A geometric algorithm to evaluate the thickness distribution of stretched sheets through finite element analysis. Appl Sci 11(4):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was carried out with the fund of the Italian M.I.U.R. (Ministry of Instruction, University, and Technological Research).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DICeM, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, via Di Biasio, 43, 03043, Cassino, FR, Italy

    Gillo Giuliano & Wilma Polini

Authors
  1. Gillo Giuliano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wilma Polini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wilma Polini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giuliano, G., Polini, W. Optimal design of blank thickness in superplastic AZ31 alloy to decrease forming time and product weight. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 118, 2153–2162 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08062-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08062-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation