Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A new approach to monitoring the operational success of shot peening with electromechanical impedance technique

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shot peening is generally an application that generates compressive residual stress on the surface of the materials and increases the fatigue life of the parts. Traditionally, control of shot-peened parts can only be done in secondary ways. In this study, using electromechanical impedance (EMI) method, which is used as a structural health monitoring method, AISI 304 stainless steel plates shot-peened with different parameters were examined. According to the study, the damage caused by the shot peening process can be determined using the root mean square deviation (RMSD) damage metric. This study is the first to track shot-peened surfaces using the EMI method. With this method, for the first time in the literature, the effects of different process parameters on shot-peened samples were carried out with the EMI method. Additionally, the hardness distribution of section and surface roughness measurements are conducted. A new approach is proposed for the quality control of the shot-peened samples in the final form, which provides the chance of direct evaluation from the parts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are presented in this article.

References

  1. Mohamed A-MO, Farhat Z, Warkentin A, Gillis J (2020) Effect of a moving automated shot peening and peening parameters on surface integrity of low carbon steel. J Mater Process Technol 277:116399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J443: Procedures for Using Standard Shot Peening Almen Test Strip—SAE International. https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j443_201708/. Accessed 29 Jun 2021

  3. Volumes 1-2 have title: Metals handbook Volumes 3-8, 11, 13, 15, 18, 20-22A, 23 lack edition statement; includes various

  4. Unal O, Varol R (2014) Almen intensity effect on microstructure and mechanical properties of low carbon steel subjected to severe shot peening. Appl Surf Sci 290:40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.10.184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wen Y, Liu P, Xie L, Wang Z, Wang L, Lu W, Jiang C, Ji V (2020) Evaluation of mechanical behavior and surface morphology of shot-peened Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Mater Eng Perform 29:182–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-04565-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu K, Lu J (2004) Nanostructured surface layer on metallic materials induced by surface mechanical attrition treatment. Mater Sci Eng A 375–377:38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu JL, Umemoto M, Todaka Y, Tsuchiya K (2007) Formation of a nanocrystalline surface layer on steels by air blast shot peening. J Mater Sci 42:7716–7720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1659-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Çakir FH, Öteyaka MÖ, Er Ü, Bozkurt F (2021) Enhancing wear resistance of AISI 304 alloy with shot peening and investigation of corrosion behaviour in marine water. Trans IMF 99:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00202967.2021.1906542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fridrici V, Fouvry S, Kapsa P (2001) Effect of shot peening on the fretting wear of Ti–6Al–4V. Wear 250:642–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00671-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zimmermann M, Klemenz M, Schulze V (2010) Literature review on shot peening simulation. Int J Comput Mater Sci Surf Eng 3:289. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCMSSE.2010.036218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Han X, Zhang Z, Hou J, Barber GC, Qiu F (2020) Tribological behavior of shot peened/austempered AISI 5160 steel. Tribol Int 145:106197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kovacı H, Hacısalihoğlu İ, Yetim AF, Çelik A (2019) Effects of shot peening pre-treatment and plasma nitriding parameters on the structural, mechanical and tribological properties of AISI 4140 low-alloy steel. Surf Coat Technol 358:256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.11.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Research L (1996) Residual stress measurement for quality control of shot peening. Shot Peen 10

  14. Withers PJ, Bhadeshia HKDH (2001) Residual stress. Part 1—Measurement techniques. Mater Sci Technol 17:355–365. https://doi.org/10.1179/026708301101509980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu X, Wang X, Guan Z, Jiang T, Geng K, Li Z (2021) Improvement and validation of residual stress measurement in composite laminates using the incremental hole-drilling method. Mech Mater 154:103715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Giurgiutiu V (2014) Structural health monitoring with piezoelectric wafer active sensors. Academic Press, an imprint of Elsevier, Amsterdam

  17. Park G, Inman DJ (2007) Structural health monitoring using piezoelectric impedance measurements. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 365:373–392. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Giurgiutiu V, Zagrai A (2005) Damage detection in thin plates and aerospace structures with the electromechanical ımpedance method. Struct Health Monit Int J 4:99–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921705049752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sadílek M, Kratochvíl J, Petrů J, et al (2014) Cutting tool wear monitoring with the use of impedance layers. 21:639–644

  20. Kek T, Kusić D, Finc M, Grum J (2016) Detection of damaged tool in ınjection molding process with acoustic emission. Res Nondestruct Eval 27:86–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09349847.2015.1061074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tekkalmaz M, Er Ü, Çakir FH, Bozkurt F (2021) A new approach to monitor wear tracks propagation on-site with electromechanical impedance technique. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 1045389X2110149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X211014951

  22. Rebillat M, Guskov M, Balmes E, Mechbal N (2016) Simultaneous ınfluence of static load and temperature on the electro-mechanical signature of piezoelectric elements bonded to composite aeronautic structures. J Vib Acoust 138:138. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liang Y, Feng Q, Li D, Cai S (2018) Loosening monitoring of a threaded pipe connection using the electromechanical ımpedance technique—experimental and numerical studies. Sensors 18:3699. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Annamdas VGM, Soh CK (2017) Load monitoring using a calibrated piezo diaphragm based impedance strain sensor and wireless sensor network in real time. Smart Mater Struct 26:045036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aa5f40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Batista da Silva R, Ferreira FI, Baptista FG, de Aguiar PR, de Souza Ruzzi R, Hubner HB, da Penha Cindra Fonseca M, Bianchi EC (2018) Electromechanical impedance (EMI) technique as alternative to monitor workpiece surface damages after the grinding operation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98:2429–2438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2390-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cammett J (2014) Are you peening too much. Shot Peen Mag 28:10–14

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kirk D, Coventry I (2012) An evolutionary guide to shot peening intensity measurement. Shot Peen Spring 24:32

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cammett J (2007) Shot peening coverage—the real deal. Shot Peen 21:8–14

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kamas T, Tekkalmaz M (2017) Coupled field modeling of E/M ımpedance of piezoelectric wafer active sensor for cataphoretic coating thickness measurement. Smart Mater Struct 26:045035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aa63e2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nokes JP, Cloud GL (1993) The application of interferometric techniques to the nondestructive inspection of fiber-reinforced materials. Exp Mech 33:314–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02322147

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank “Turkish Air Force, 1st Air Supply and Maintenance Center Command, Eskisehir” for performing the shot peening tests and inspections.

Funding

The presented work was partially funded by Eskişehir Osmangazi University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, 26480, Eskisehir, Turkey

    Mesut Tekkalmaz & Ümit Er

  2. Eskişehir Vocational School, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey

    Fatih Hayati Çakir

  3. Vocational School of Transportation, Eskisehir Technical University, 26140, Eskişehir, Turkey

    Fatih Bozkurt

Authors
  1. Mesut Tekkalmaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ümit Er
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fatih Hayati Çakir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fatih Bozkurt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FB and ÜE organized the shot peening tests and prepared samples, MT conducted EMI measurements and damage metric calculations, FHÇ presented the outline of the study and analyzed and wrote the experimental findings.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatih Bozkurt.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The authors consent to participate.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tekkalmaz, M., Er, Ü., Çakir, F.H. et al. A new approach to monitoring the operational success of shot peening with electromechanical impedance technique. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 117, 3503–3513 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07933-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07933-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation