Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Simulation of the thermoforming process of glass fiber–reinforced polymeric components: investigation of the combined effect of the crosshead speed and material temperature

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thermoplastic-based composite materials are increasingly gaining the interest of many engineering sectors, among them the automotive. Their unique features, resulted from the thermoplastic matrix characteristics, such as their recyclability and their formability have given new perspectives in their use. Among the most promising fabrication methods of thermoplastic composite components is the thermoforming process, the press forming of a heated semi-finalized composite plate. This method, although requires a quite simple working station and can be implemented in mass production, demonstrates a series of disadvantages on the quality of the product. Among them, the variation of the thickness, formation of wrinkles, and overall undesired deformations are considered as defects that decrease the quality not only from the esthetical but also from the structural point of view. In the present work, a numerical analysis of the thermoforming process is conducted when applied to a box-shaped geometry. As an input for the material behavior during the process, mechanical tests are conducted at elevated temperatures. The flat and curved critical zones of the component are identified, and an analysis of the effect of the temperature and the crosshead speed of the molds on the thickness distribution are examined as well as the overall residual stress field. The results indicate a strong dependency on the quality of the product by these parameters of the process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to restrictions imposed by the funding scheme but are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Gupta G, Kumar A, Tyagi R, Kumar S (2016) Application and future of composite materials: a review. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology 5(5):6907–6911. https://doi.org/10.15680/IJIRSET.2016.0505041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nickels L (2019) New innovations in automotive thermoplastics. Reinf Plast 63(4):185–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repl.2019.06.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Patel M, Pardhi B, Chopara S, Pal M (2018) Lightweight composite materials for automotive - a review. Int Res J Eng Technol 5(11):41–47

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stewart R (2011) Thermoplastic composites-recyclable and fast to process. Reinf Plast 55(3):22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-3617(11)70073-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cogswell F.N. (1992) Thermoplastic aromatic polymer composites. Butterworth-Heinemann, ISBN 9780750610865.

  6. Campbell F.C. (2004) Manufacturing processes for advanced composites. Elsevier Science, ISBN 9781856174152.

  7. Nickels L (2019) New innovations in automotive thermoplastics. Reinf Plast 63(4):185–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repl.2019.06.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ashter S.A. (2014) Thermoforming of single and multilayer laminates. William Andrew Publishing, ISBN 9781455731725.

  9. Abbassi F, Elfaleh I, Mistou S, Zghal A, Fazzini M, Djilali T (2011) Experimental and numerical investigations of a thermoplastic composite (carbon/PPS) thermoforming. Struct Control Health Monit 18:769–780. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sadighi M, Rabizadeh E, Kermansaravi F (2008) Effects of laminate sequencing on thermoforming of thermoplastic matrix composites. J Mater Process Technol 20I:725–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. De Luca P, Lefebure P, Pickett AK (1998) Numerical and experimental investigation of some press forming parameters of two fibre reinforced thermoplastics: APC2-AS4 and PEI-CETEX. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 29A:101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00060-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guzman-Maldonado E, Hamila N, Boisse P, Bikard J (2015) Thermomechanical analysis, modelling and simulation of the forming of pre-impregnated thermoplastic composites. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 78:211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Haanappel SN, Ten Thije RHW, Sachs U, Rietman B, Akkerman R (2014) Formability analyses of uni-directional and textile reinforced thermoplastics. Compos Part A 56:80–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stamopoulos AG, Spitilli P, D’Emilia G, Gaspari A, Natale E, Di Ilio A (2020) Assessment of the measurements contribution on composites thermoforming processes: a case study of an automotive component. 2020 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 & IoT, 14-16 June 2020, Rome, Italy. https://doi.org/10.1109/MetroInd4.0IoT48571.2020.9138197

  15. Dorr D, Brymerski W, Ropers S, Leutz D, Joppich T, Karger L, Henning F (2017) A benchmark study of finite element codes for forming simulation of thermoplastic UD-tapes. Procedia CIRP 66:101–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stamopoulos AG, Di Ilio A (2019) On the predictive tools for assessing the effect of manufacturing defects on the mechanical properties of composite materials. Procedia CIRP 79:563–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ten Thije RHW, Akkerman R, Huetink J (2007) Large deformation simulation of anisotropic material. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(33-34):3141–3150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2007.02.010

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen QQ, Boisse P, Hamila N, Saouab A, Park CH, Breard D (2009) A finite element method for the forming simulation of the reinforcements of thermoplastic composite. Int J Mater Form 2(1):213–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-009-0655-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamila N, Boisse P, Sabourin F, Brunet M (2009) A semi-discrete shell finite element for textile composite reinforcement forming simulation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 79:1443–1466. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2625

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Haanappel SP, Akkerman R (2014) Shear characterization of uni-directional fibre reinforced thermoplastic melts by means of torsion. Compos Part A 56:8–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Harrison P, Clifford MJ, Long AC (2004) Shear characterization of viscous woven textile composites: a comparison between picture frame and bias extension experiments. Compos Sci Technol 64:1453–1465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.10.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Harrison P, Alvarez MF, Anderson D (2018) Towards comprehensive characterization and modelling of the forming and wrinkling mechanics of engineering fabrics. Int J Solids Struct 154:2–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Boisse P, Hamila N, Guzman-Maldonado E, Madeo A, Hivet G, Dell’Isola F (2017) The bias-extension test for the analysis of in-plane shear properties of textile composite reinforcements and prepregs: a review. Int J Mater Form 10:473–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-016-1294-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Di Ilio A, Di Genova LG, Stamopoulos A (2021) Implementation of the modified V-notched rail shear method for characterizing glass fiber thermoplastic composites at sub-zero and elevated temperatures. Polym Test 93:106874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mattner T, Korbel W, Wrensch M, Drummer D (2018) Compensation of edge effects of picture frame testing of continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastics. Composites Part B 142:95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sharma SB, Sutcliffe MPF, Chang SH (2003) Characterization of material properties for draping of dry woven composite material. Composites Part A 34:1167–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xiong H, Hamila N, Boisse P (2019) Consolidation modelling during thermoforming of thermoplastic composite prepregs. Materials 12(18):2853. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12182853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Althammer F., Iwan S., Mueller S., Troelzsch J., Kroll L. (2017) Simulating the forming of thermoplastic, fiber reinforced plastics-Demonstrated for a side impact protection bar. KMUTNB International Journal of Applied Science and Technology 10 (2): 133-143. https://doi.org/10.14416/j.ijast.2017.05.006, http://ojs.kmutnb.ac.th/index.php/ijst/article/view/910

  29. Fiumarella D, Boria S, Belingardi G, Scattina A (2019) Experimental and numerical analysis of a thermoplastic lamina for composite material. Procedia Struct Integr 24:11–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2020.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. ASTM D3418-03 Standard test method for transition temperatures of polymers by differential scanning calorimetry, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2003).

  31. ASTM D5035-06, Standard test method for breaking force and elongation of textile fabrics (strip method), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2008).

  32. Cao J, Akkerman R, Boisse P, Chen J, Cheng HS, de Graaf EF, Gorczyka JL, Harisson P, Hivet G, Launay J, Lee W, Liu L, Lomov SV, Long A, Morestin F, Padvoiskis J, Peng XQ, Sherwood J, Tz S et al (2008) Characterization of mechanical behavior of woven fabrics: experimental methods and benchmark results. Composites Part A 39:1037–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yeager M, Cline J, Bogetti T, White K, Sherwood J (2019) Characterization and modeling of the in-plane shear deformation in ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) composites. Technical Report, DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory, ARL-TP-8791 (September 2019)

  34. Sachs U, Akkerman R (2017) Viscoelastic bending model for continues fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites in melt. Composites Part A 100:333–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.05.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sachs U, Akkerman R, Fetfatsidis K, Vidal-Sallè E, Schumaher J, Ziegmann G, Allaoui S, Hivet G, Maron B, Vanclooster K, Lomov SV (2014) Characterization of the dynamic friction of woven fabrics: Experimental methods and benchmark studies. Composites Part A 67:289–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ravashdeh S, Al-Raheil I (2012) The structure of isotactic polypropylene crystallized from the melt. J Chem Eng Process Technol 3:5. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7048.1000140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang Y, Cheng L, Cui X, Guo W (2019) Crystallization behavior and properties of glass fiber reinforced polypropylene composites. Polymers 11:1198. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11071198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gradys A, Sajkiewicz P, Minakov AA, Adamovsky S, Schick C, Hashimoto T, Saijo K (2005) Crystallization of polypropylene at various cooling rates. Mater Sci Eng A 413-414:442–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Alshahrani H, Hojjati M (2017) Bending behavior of multilayered textile composite prepregs: experiment and finite element modeling. Mater Des 124:211–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Alshahrani H (2020) Characterization and finite element modeling of coupled properties during polymer composites forming processes. Mech Mater 144:103370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. AniForm Virtual Forming Tool. Software and help-manual.www.aniform.com.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors also wish to express their sincere appreciation for the collaboration with the Thermoplastic Composites Research Center (TPRC) in the Netherlands on the execution of the experimental campaign.

Funding

This work was supported by the Italian research project C.R.AB (Composites Research Abruzzo) under the auspices of the Region of Abruzzo (Italy) and the European Union (POR FESR Abruzzo 2014-2020 – ASSE I- Attività 1.1.1 e 1.1.4, contract CAR n.2617-COR n.217245).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial and Information Engineering and Economics (DIIIE), University of L’Aquila, Montelucco di Roio, 67100, L’Aquila, Italy

    Antonios G. Stamopoulos, Antoniomaria Di Ilio & Luca Glauco Di Genova

Authors
  1. Antonios G. Stamopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antoniomaria Di Ilio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luca Glauco Di Genova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

•Antonios Stamopoulos: research, data acquisition and analysis, document preparation and review

•Luca Glauco Di Genova: research, data acquisition

•Antoniomaria Di Ilio: funding, data analysis, document preparation and review

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonios G. Stamopoulos.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate

The authors consent to participate.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stamopoulos, A.G., Di Ilio, A. & Di Genova, L.G. Simulation of the thermoforming process of glass fiber–reinforced polymeric components: investigation of the combined effect of the crosshead speed and material temperature. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 117, 2987–3009 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07845-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07845-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation