Skip to main content
Log in

Voxel-based modeling of transient material removal in machining

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, a novel framework is presented that models the transient interaction between cutting teeth of an arbitrary end mill geometry and a workpiece. In this framework, the workpiece geometry is modeled using a voxelized representation that is dynamically updated as material is locally removed by each tooth of the cutting tool. A ray casting approach was used to mimic the process of the cutting faces of the tool intersecting the workpiece material. This ray casting approach was used to calculate the instantaneous undeformed chip thickness. The resulting voxel-based model framework was validated by comparison of predictions with experimentally measured milling forces. The effect of voxel size on model predictions was evaluated, and the ability of the model to describe the interactive effects of sequential machining passes was also investigated. Implications of this voxel-based model framework in terms of utility for predicting local surface finish and computational scalability of complex cutting configurations are briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

All simulation data is available upon request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Praniewicz M, Kurfess T, Saldana C (2019) An adaptive geometry transformation and repair method for hybrid manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng:011006

  2. Zhu Z, Dhokia VG, Nassehi A, Newman ST (2013) A review of hybrid manufacturing processes–state of the art and future perspectives. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 26:596–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Newman ST, Zhu Z, Dhokia V, Shokrani A (2015) Process planning for additive and subtractive manufacturing technologies. CIRP Ann 64:467–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tucker TM, Kurfess T Konobrtskyi D (2018) “Hybrid dynamic tree data structure and accessibility mapping for computer numerically controlled machining path planning”. United States of America Patent US 9971335 B2, 15 May

  5. Tarbutton J, Kurfess T, Tucker T, Konobrytskyi D (2013) Gouge-free voxel-based machining for parallel processors. Int J Manuf Technol 69:1941–1953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tarbutton J, Kurfess T, Tucker T (2010) Graphics based path planning for multi-axis machine tools. Computer Aided Design and Applications 7(6):835–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lynn R, Contis D, Hossain M, Huang N, Tucker T, Kurfess T (2017) Voxel model surface offsetting for computer-aided manufacturing using virtualized high-performance computing. J Manuf Syst 43:296–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Budak E (2006) Analytical models for high performance milling. Part I: cutting forces, structural deformations and tolerance integrity. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:1478–1488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Altintas Y (2000) Manufacturing automation. The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, pp 4–47

    Google Scholar 

  10. Altintas Y (2012) Manufacturing automation: metal cutting mechanics, machine tool vibrations, and CNC design. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Azeem A, Feng H-Y, Wang L (2003) Simplified and efficient calibration of a mechanistic cutting force model for ball-end milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(2004):291–298

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gradisek J, Kalveram M, Weinert K (2004) Mechanistic identification of specific force coefficients for a general end mill. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:401–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Childs JJ (1973) Numerical control part programming. Industrial Press, Alexandria, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhen L, Li Y, Liang SY (1997) A generalized model of milling forces. Int J Manuf Technol 14:160–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Altintas Y, Spence A (1991) End milling force algorithms for CAD systems. Annls of the CIRP 40(1):31–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaymakci M, Kilic ZM, Altintas Y (2012) Unified cutting force model for turning, boring, drilling, and milling operations. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 54-55:34–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferry W, Yip-Hoi D (2008) Cutter-workpiece engagement calculations by parallel slicing for five-axis flank milling of jet engine impellers. J Manuf Sci Eng 130:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  18. Engin S, Altintas Y (2001) Mechanics and dynamics of general milling cutters. Part 1: helical end mills. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:2196–2212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Merdol SD, Altintas Y (2008) Virtual simulation and optimization of milling operations. Part I: process simulation. J Manuf Sci Eng 130(051004):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kim GM (2000) Cutting force prediction of sculpted surface ball-end milling using Z-Map. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40:277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Armarego EJA, Deshpande NP (1993) Force prediction models and CAD/CAM software for helical tooth milling processes. I Basic approach and cutting analyses. Int J Prod Res 31(8):1991–2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. El-Mounayri H, Elbestawi MA, Spence AD, Bedi S (1997) General geometric modelling approach for machining process simulation. Int J Manuf Technol 13:237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jang D, Kim K, Jung J (2000) Voxel-based virtual multi-axis machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 16:709–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ehmann KF, Kapoor SG, Devor RE, Lazoglu I (1997) Machining process modelling: a review. J Manuf Sci Eng 119:655–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wou SJ, Shin YC, El-Mounayri H (2013) Ball end milling mechanistic model based on a voxel-based geometric representation and a ray casting technique. J Manuf Process 15

  26. J. Pawasauskas, “Volume visualization with ray casting,” 18 February 1997. [Online]. Available: http://web.cs.wpi.edu/~matt/courses/cs563/talks/powwie/p1/ray-cast.htm#Introduction. [Accessed 21 October 2017].

  27. Amanatides J, Woo A (1987) A fast voxel traversal algorithm for ray tracing. Proceedings in Eurographics:1–10

  28. Zalik B, Clapworthy G, Oblonsek C (1997) An efficient code-based voxel-traversing algorithm. Computer Graphics Forum: The Eurographics Association 16(2):119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Smits B (1999) Efficiency issues for ray tracing. Journal of Graphics Tools:1–12

  30. Williams A, Barrus S, Morley RK Shirley P “An efficient and robust ray-box intersection algorithm,” Journal of Graphics Tools, 2005.

  31. Koenigsberger F, Sabberwal AP (1961) An investigation into the cutting force pulsations during milling operations. Int J Mach Tool Design and Res 1(1-2):15–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Armarego EJA, Epp CJ (1970) An investigation of zero helix peripheral up-milling. Int J Mach Tool Design 10:273–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rubeo MA, Shmitz TL (2016) Milling force modelling: a comparison of two approaches. Pocedia Manufacturing 5(44):90–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Budak E, Altintas Y, Armarego EJA (1996) Prediction of milling force coefficients form orthogonal cutting data. J Manuf Sci Eng 118(May):216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Martellotti ME (1941) An analysis of the milling process. Transactions of the ASME 63(8):677–700

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tyson Tool Company Limited, “Technical-Mill-Formulas.pdf,” [Online]. Available: http://www.tysontool.com/tech-mill-formulas.pdf. [Accessed 20 November 2018]

Download references

Funding

This work was partially supported by NSF CMMI-1646013, CMMI-1825640, and IIP-1631803.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

John Miers conducted the experiments and simulations, analyzed the results, and wrote the manuscript.

Thomas Tucker supported the analysis of results, as well as wrote and edited the manuscript.

Thomas Kurfess supported analysis of the results, as well as wrote and edited the manuscript.

Christopher Saldana conceived the study objectives, supported the analysis of results, as well as wrote and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Saldana.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miers, J.C., Tucker, T., Kurfess, T. et al. Voxel-based modeling of transient material removal in machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 116, 1575–1589 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07545-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07545-x

Keywords

Navigation