Skip to main content
Log in

A mechanical model of axial and circumferential bidirectional deformation for large thin-walled pipes in the process of continuous and synchronous calibration of roundness and straightness by three rollers

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a mechanical model of axial and circumferential bidirectional deformation has been developed by considering two factors: roller shape and radial reduction. Since the calibration of the roundness and that of the straightness of pipes are currently separate processes, the established mechanical models are based on a single direction. However, the established bidirectional mechanical model can describe not only the stress-strain distribution of the pipe in deformation to determine the position of the stress concentration but also the deformation curve of the pipe in different directions. As a result, it can serve as a theoretical basis for setting process parameters and optimizing roller shape. A large thin-walled pipe of Al6063 is modeled and then numerically simulated with FEM software of ABAQUS, and the results are compared with the model. Then, the process is fabricated and tested experimentally. The results are compared with the mechanical and numerical models. The distribution of equivalent stress and equivalent strain obtained by the model has a good match with the simulation results, and the maximum relative error is not more than 25%. The axial and circumferential deformation curve calculated by the mechanical model coincides well with the simulation and experimental results, and the maximum error is not greater than 3.0 mm. Obviously, both the experiment and the simulation have verified a superior validity of the model.

Graphical abstract

A mechanical model of axial and circumferential bidirectional deformation has been developed by considering two factors: roller shape and radial reduction. The model can describe not only the stress-strain distribution of pipes in deformation to determine the position of the stress concentration but also the deformation curve of pipes in different directions. It provides a theoretical basis for the setting of process parameters and the optimization of roller shape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li HL (2001) Some hot issues of research and application for natural gas transmission pipes. China Mechan Eng 12:349–352

    Google Scholar 

  2. Trifonov OV, Cherniy VP (2012) Elastoplastic stress–strain analysis of buried steel pipelines subjected to fault displacements with account for service loads. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 33(1):54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Trifonov OV, Cherniy VP (2010) A semi-analytical approach to a nonlinear stress–strain analysis of buried steel pipelines crossing active faults. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(11):1298–1308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Papadaki CI, Karamanos SA, Chatzopoulou G, Sarvanis GC (2018) Buckling of internally-pressurized spiral-welded steel pipes under bending. Int J Press Vessel Pip 165:270–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2018.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Draper S, Griffiths T, Cheng L, White D, An H (2018) Modelling changes to submarine pipeline embedment and stability due to pipeline scour. 37th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore & Arctic Engineering: OMAE2018 (22/06/18).

  6. Chatzopoulou G, Karamanos SA, Varelis GE (2015) Numerical simulation of UOE pipe process and its effect on pipe mechanical behavior in deep-water applications. Proceedings of the ASME 2015 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Volume 5B: Pipeline and Riser Technology. St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada. May 31-June 5. V05BT04A036. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2015-41457

  7. Robertson M, Griffiths T, Viecelli G, Oldfield S, Ma P, Al-Showaiter A, Carneiro D (2015) The influence of pipeline bending stiffness on 3D dynamic on-bottom stability and importance for flexible flowlines, cables and umbilicals[C]// ASME 2015 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2015-41646

  8. Zhao J, Zhan PP, Ma R, Zhai RX (2014) Prediction and control of springback in setting round process for pipe-end of large pipe. Int J Press Vessel Pip 116:56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2014.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu GC, Zhao J, Ma R, Zhai RX (2016) Uniform curvature theorem by reciprocating bending and its experimental verification. Chin J Mechan Eng 52:57–63. https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2016.18.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang XY, Yu GC, Zhao J, Mu ZK, Zhang ZY, Ma R (2020) Numerical simulation and experimental investigations on a three-roller setting round process for thin-walled pipes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107:355–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05087-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang CG, Yu GC, Wang W, Zhao J (2018) Deflection detection and curve fitting in three-roll continuous straightening process for LSAW pipes. J Mater Process Technol 255:150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.11.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cui F, Yang HL (2015) New understanding in the field of straightening theory. Heavy Machin 1:2–5. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-196X.2015.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao J, Yu GC, WANG HR (2017) A roller-type continuous and synchronous calibrating straightness and roundness equipment and processing method for pipes. Hebei: CN106623507A, 2017-05-10.

  14. Karamitros DK, Bouckovalas GD, Kouretzis GP (2007) Stress analysis of buried steel pipelines at strike-slip fault crossing. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27:200–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao J, Yu GC, Ma R (2016) A mechanical model of symmetrical three-roller setting round process: the static bending stage. J Mater Process Technol 231:501–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Song HP, Xie KK, Gao CF (2020) Progressive thermal stress distribution around a crack under Joule heating in orthotropic materials. Appl Math Model 86:271–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2020.04.022

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang ZQ (2019) Modeling and simulation for cross-sectional ovalization of thin-walled tubes in continuous rotary straightening process. Int J Mech Sci 153-154:83–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.01.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Taheri-Behrooz F, Pourahmadi E (2018) Mutual effect of Coriolis acceleration and temperature gradient on the stress and strain field of a glass/epoxy composite cylinder. Appl Math Model 59:164–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2018.01.036

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng X, Guo XZ, Tao J, Xu Y, Abd El-Aty A, Liu H (2019) Investigation of the effect of relative thickness (t/d) on the formability of the AA6061 tubes during free bending process. Int J Mech Sci 160:103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu GC, Zhai RX, Zhao J, Ma R (2018) Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation on the process mechanism of two-roller straightening. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(9):4011–4021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1120-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang ZQ, Yan YH, Yang HL, Wang L (2015) Modeling and analysis of the limit bending-radius for straightening a thin-walled tube with equal curvature. J Mechan Strength 37:651–656. https://doi.org/10.16579/j.issn.1001.9669.2015.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao J, Yin J, Ma R, Ma LX (2011) Springback equation of small curvature plane bending. Sci China Technol Sci 54:2386–2396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-011-4447-4

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou Z, Qin LL, Huang WB, Wang HW (2004) Effective stress and strain in finite deformation. Appl Math Mech 25(5):542–550. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-0887.2004.05.013

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Karafi M, Kamali S (2021) A continuum electro-mechanical model of ultrasonic Langevin transducers to study its frequency response - ScienceDirect. Appl Math Model 92:44–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2020.11.006

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Natural Science Foundation of Hebei province, and National Major Science and Technology Projects of China for their financial support.

Funding

This project was funded and supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 52005431), National Natural Science Foundation of Hebei province (grant number E2020203086), and National Major Science and Technology Projects of China (grant number 2018ZX04007002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Xueying Huang: conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing - original draft, writing - review and editing, software, visualization.

Gaochao Yu: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, supervision, writing - review and editing.

Honglei Sun: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, supervision.

Jun Zhao: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaochao Yu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The authors declare that this manuscript was not submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration. Also, the submitted work is original and not have been published elsewhere in any form or language.

Consent to participate and publish

The authors declare that they participated in this paper willingly and the authors declare to consent to the publication of this paper.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Equation (30) can be simplified as follows:

$$ {a_1}^6+{a_1}^4\left(3{b_1}^2-3{r}^2\right)+{a_1}^2\left(3{b_1}^4-7{b_1}^2{r}^2+3{r}^4\right)+{b_1}^6-3{b_1}^4{r}^2+3{b_1}^2{r}^4-{r}^6=0 $$
(44)

If a is made to be 3b12 − 3r2, b is 3b14 − 7b12r2 + 3r4, c is b16 − 3b14r2 + 3b12r4 − r6, and a12 is y, the following equations can be obtained.

$$ {y}^3+{ay}^2+ by+c=0 $$
(45)

By substituting y = x − a/3 into Eq. (45), the form of x3 + px + q = 0 can be given as follows:

$$ {x}^3+\left(b-\frac{a^2}{3}\right)x+\frac{2{a}^3}{27}+c-\frac{ab}{3}=0 $$
(46)

where \( p=b-\frac{a^2}{3} \); \( q=\frac{2{a}^3}{27}+c-\frac{ab}{3} \). A real number solution is given by Eq. (46), such as Eq. (47).

$$ x=\sqrt[3]{-\frac{q}{2}+\sqrt{{\left(\frac{q}{2}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{p}{3}\right)}^3}}+\sqrt[3]{-\frac{q}{2}-\sqrt{{\left(\frac{q}{2}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{p}{3}\right)}^3}} $$
(47)

The following conclusions can be drawn, as shown in Eq. (48).

$$ {a_1}^2=y=\sqrt[3]{-\frac{q}{2}+\sqrt{{\left(\frac{q}{2}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{p}{3}\right)}^3}}+\sqrt[3]{-\frac{q}{2}-\sqrt{{\left(\frac{q}{2}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{p}{3}\right)}^3}}-\frac{a}{3} $$
(48)

The curve PQ can be obtained by substituting Eqs. (48) and (28) into Eq. (26).

$$ \left.\begin{array}{l}\frac{{x_1}^2}{\sqrt[3]{-\frac{q}{2}+\sqrt{{\left(\frac{q}{2}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{p}{3}\right)}^3}}+\sqrt[3]{-\frac{q}{2}-\sqrt{{\left(\frac{q}{2}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{p}{3}\right)}^3}}-\frac{a}{3}}+\frac{{y_1}^2}{{\left(r-H\right)}^2}=1\\ {}\begin{array}{cc}\begin{array}{cc}& \end{array}& \end{array}\kern1.00em \left(-{m}_1\le {x}_1\le {m}_1;{y}_{m_1}\le {y}_1\le r-H\right)\end{array}\right\} $$
(49)

Substituting Eq. (37) into Eq. (36), and making a 2 2 = z, x 2 2 = z + m 2 2, the cubic equation with a variable z can be expressed as follows:

$$ {z}^3+{z}^2\left(6{m_2}^2-{r}^2\right)+12{m_2}^4z+8{m_2}^6=0 $$
(50)

where \( {m}_2=r\sin \frac{2\pi -6\arcsin \frac{m_1}{r}}{6} \) (see Appendix C for details). Similarly, the following can be obtained by making e = 6m22 − r2, f = 12m24, and g = 8m26.

$$ {z}^3+{z}^2e+ zf+g=0 $$
(51)

Let \( z=x-\frac{e}{3} \) and substitute it into Eq. (51); Eq. (52) can be obtained.

$$ {x}^3+\left(f-\frac{e^2}{3}\right)x+\frac{2{e}^3}{27}+g-\frac{ef}{3}=0 $$
(52)

where \( {p}_1=f-\frac{e^2}{3} \), \( {q}_1=\frac{2{e}^3}{27}+g-\frac{ef}{3} \). A real number solution is given by Eq. (52), such as Eq. (53).

$$ x=\sqrt[3]{-\frac{q_1}{2}+\sqrt{{\left(\frac{q_1}{2}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{p_1}{3}\right)}^3}}+\sqrt[3]{-\frac{q_1}{2}-\sqrt{{\left(\frac{q_1}{2}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{p_1}{3}\right)}^3}} $$
(53)

The following conclusions can be drawn, as shown in Eq. (54).

$$ {a_2}^2=z=\sqrt[3]{-\frac{q_1}{2}+\sqrt{{\left(\frac{q_1}{2}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{p_1}{3}\right)}^3}}+\sqrt[3]{-\frac{q_1}{2}-\sqrt{{\left(\frac{q_1}{2}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{p_1}{3}\right)}^3}}-\frac{e}{3} $$
(54)

By substituting Eq. (54) into Eq. (35), the curve WT can be expressed as follows:

$$ \left.\begin{array}{l}{x_2}^2-{y_2}^2=\sqrt[3]{-\frac{q_1}{2}+\sqrt{{\left(\frac{q_1}{2}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{p_1}{3}\right)}^3}}+\sqrt[3]{-\frac{q_1}{2}-\sqrt{{\left(\frac{q_1}{2}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{p_1}{3}\right)}^3}}-\frac{e}{3}\\ {}\begin{array}{cc}\begin{array}{cc}& \end{array}& \end{array}\kern1.00em \left({a}_2\le {x}_2\le {x}_{m_2};-{m}_2\le {y}_2\le {m}_2\right)\end{array}\right\} $$
(55)

As can be seen from the fact that three reverse bending regions and three positive bending regions are evenly distributed across the circular cross-section of the pipe, the angle corresponding to the region is also evenly distributed.

$$ {\theta}_{\mathrm{T}}+{\theta}_{\mathrm{F}}=\frac{2\pi }{3} $$
(56)

where θT is the angle corresponding to the reverse bending region, and θF is the angle corresponding to the positive bending region. The geometric relationship can be obtained in Fig. 13 and Fig. 14.

$$ \left.\begin{array}{l}\sin \frac{\theta_{\mathrm{T}}}{2}=\frac{m_1}{r}\\ {}\sin \frac{\theta_{\mathrm{F}}}{2}=\frac{m_2}{r}\end{array}\right\} $$
(57)

Equation (57) is substituted into Eq. (56), and Eq. (58) and Eq. (59) can be obtained.

$$ {\theta}_{\mathrm{F}}=\frac{2\pi }{3}-2\arcsin \frac{m_1}{r} $$
(58)
$$ {m}_2=r\sin \frac{2\pi -6\arcsin \frac{m_1}{r}}{6} $$
(59)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, X., Yu, G., Sun, H. et al. A mechanical model of axial and circumferential bidirectional deformation for large thin-walled pipes in the process of continuous and synchronous calibration of roundness and straightness by three rollers. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 116, 3809–3826 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07479-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07479-4

Keywords

Navigation