Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Microstructure and mechanical properties of spark plasma diffusion-bonded 5A06Al joints with Al–20Cu–5Si–2Ni interlayer

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spark plasma diffusion welding (SPDW) is a powerful technique for joining materials at a remarkably short time with excellent quality. In this paper, SPDW of 5A06Al alloy to itself was conducted with Al–20Cu–5Si–2Ni brazing filler alloy added as the interlayer. In the bonding temperature ranging from 520 to 550°C, pressure from 0.3 to 6 MPa, and holding time from 10 to 20 min, the optimal joint was obtained at bonding temperature of 540°C and pressure of 6 MPa for 10 min. Results showed that the void-free 5A06Al/5A06Al-bonded joint was obtained at the optimized parameters with the aiding of electric current and Al–20Cu–5Si–2Ni interlayer. Increasing the bonding pressure produced more refined grains in the bonding joint and was therefore beneficial to the bonding quality. The formation of refined eutectic phases, the accelerated atomic diffusion, the sufficiently removal of oxide film, and the evidently more narrowed bonding interface areas were helpful to strengthen the SPDW joint. The most efficient bonding joint had a tensile strength of as high as 220 MPa and exhibited typical fine ductile dimple fractography. Comparatively, the poorest joint quality was obtained at lower bonding temperature and pressure, i.e., bonding temperature of 530°C, pressure of 0.3 MPa, and holding time of 10 min.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data sets supporting the results of this article are included within the article.

References

  1. Chen JC, Wei YH, Zhan XH, Pan P (2017) Weld profile, microstructure, and mechanical property of laser–welded butt joints of 5A06 Al alloy with static magnetic field support. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:1677–1686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tsao LC, Weng WP, Cheng MD, Tsao CW, Chuang TH (2002) Brazeability of a 3003 Aluminum alloy with Al–Si–Cu–based filler metals. J Mater Eng Perform 11:360–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang SY, Tsao LC, Li TY, Chuang TH (2009) Joining 6061 aluminum alloy with Al–Si–Cu filler metals. J Alloys Compd 488:174–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Luo W, Wang LT, Wang QM, Gong HL, Yan M (2014) A new filler metal with low contents of Cu for high strength aluminum alloy brazed joints. Mater Des 63:263–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobson DM, Humpston G, Sangha SPS (1996) A new low–melting–point aluminum braze. Weld J Res Suppl 75:243–250s

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pei C, Wu X, Zhang GQ, Cheng YY, Ren XY, Wang W, Xiong HP (2020) Microstructures and mechanical properties of brazed 6063 aluminum alloy joint with Al–Cu–Si–Ni filler metal. Weld World 64:1933–1938

  7. Zhang GW, Bao YF, Jiang YF, Zhu H (2010) Microstructure and mechanical properties of 6063 aluminum alloy brazed joints with Al–Si–Cu–Ni–RE filler metal. J Mater Eng Perform 20:1451–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang SY, Tsao LC, Lei YH, Mao SM, Huang CH (2012) Brazing of 6061 aluminum alloy/Ti–6Al–4V using Al–Si–Cu–Ge filler metals. J Mater Process Technol 212:8–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsui M, Kondou K, WadaK OO (2011) Effects of post heat treatment on 5052Al and 6063 aluminum joints during pulsed electric current bonding. Weld J 25(03):159–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang CY, Li XF, Zhong ZH, Song KJ, Wang GP, Zhou W, Wu YC (2020) Microstructure and mechanical properties of W/steel joints diffusion bonded with Nb and Nb/Ni interlayers by spark plasma sintering. J Adhes Sci Technol 34(24):2638–2651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang B, Jiang SS, Zhang KF (2019) Pulse current auxiliary TLP diffusion bonding of SiCp/2024Al composite sheet using mixed Al–Cu–Ti powder interlayer. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65:1779–1784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Naveen Kumar N, Janaki Ram GD, Bhattacharya SS, Dey HC, Albert SK (2015) Spark plasma welding of austenitic stainless steel AISI 304L to commercially pure titanium. Trans Indian Inst Metals 68(Suppl 2):S289–S297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang Z, Hu K, Hu DW, Han CL, Tong YG, Yang XY, Wei FZ, Zhang JX, Shen Y, Chen J, Wu XG (2018) Diffusion bonding between TZM alloy and WRe alloy by spark plasma sintering. J Alloys Compd 764:582–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen C, Qian SF, Liu R, Wang S, Liao B, Zhong ZH, Cao LF, Coenene J, Wu YC (2019) The microstructure and tensile properties of W/Ti multilayer composites prepared by spark plasma sintering. J Alloys Compd 780:116–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li HX, Wang ZQ, Zhong ZH, Wen Q, Song KJ, Zhang HB, Wu YC (2018) Micro–alloying effects of yttrium on the microstructure and strength of silicon carbide joint brazed with chromium–silicon eutectic alloy. J Alloys Compd 738:354–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kondou K, Matsumoto N, Wada K, Ohashi O (2009) Effect of bonding conditions on joints of 5052Al and 6063Al in pulsed electric current bonding. Weld J 23(11):810–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xie GQ, Ohashi O, Wada K, Ogawa T, Song MH, Furuya K (2006) Interface microstructure of aluminum die–casting alloy joints bonded by pulse electric–current bonding process. Mater Sci Eng A 428:12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Munir ZA, Anselmi-Tamburini U, Ohyanagi M (2006) The effect of electric field and pressure on the synthesis and consolidation of materials: a review of the spark plasma sintering method. J Mater Sci 41:763–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chikui N, Furuhata H, Ymaguchi N, Ohashi O (2004) Comparison of joints by pulse electric current bonding and diffusion bonding (in Japanese). J Jpn Inst Metals 68:515–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rezaei M, Jabbari AH, Sedighi M (2020) Investigation of surface roughness effects on microstructural and mechanical properties of diffusion bonding between dissimilar AZ91–D magnesium and AA6061 aluminum alloys. Weld World 64:949–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wachowski M, Kosturek R, Sniezek L, Mróz S, Stefanik A, Szota P (2020) The effect of post–weld hot-rolling on the properties of explosively welded Mg/Al/Ti multilayer composite. Materials 13(8):1930–1944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang X, Casolco SR, Xu G, Garay JE (2007) Finite element modeling of electric current–activated sintering: the effect of coupled electrical potential, temperature and stress. Acta Mater 55:3611–3622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rathel J, Herrmann M, Beckert W (2009) Temperature distribution for electrically conductive and non–conductive materials during field assisted sintering (FAST). J Eur Ceram Soc 29:1419–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu F, Zhou WL, Han YJ, Fu XS, Xu YJ, Hou HL (2018) Effect of alloying elements gradient on solid–state diffusion bonding between aerospace aluminum alloys. Materials 11:1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ujah C, Popoola O, Aigbodion V (2019) Optimisation of spark plasma sintering parameters of Al–CNTs–Nb nano–composite using Taguchi design of experiment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100(5–8):1563–1573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hasan M, Zhao JW, Huang ZY, Wei DB, Jiang ZY (2019) Analysis and characterisation of WC–10Co and AISI 4340 steel bimetal composite produced by powder–solid diffusion bonding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103(9):3247–3263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hooshmand MS, Zhong W, Zhao JC, Windl W, Ghazisaeidi M (2020) Data on the comprehensive first–principles diffusion study of the aluminum–magnesium system. Data Brief 30:105381

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Code availability

Not applicable.

Funding

The authors received financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51905143 and 31971594), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M612064).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kuijing Song or Fei Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication of this paper was obtained from Hefei University and Technology and all authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• Spark plasma diffusion bonding of 5A06Al with interlayer was demonstrated.

• The influence of bonding conditions on joint microstructure and mechanical performance was determined.

• The temperature-pressure-current auxiliary bonding mechanism was analytically presented.

• The joint strength reached 220 MPa, which is doubled compared with vacuum brazed joint.

• Bonding parameters optimization was performed to produce efficient joints.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, K., Lv, L., Zhu, S. et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of spark plasma diffusion-bonded 5A06Al joints with Al–20Cu–5Si–2Ni interlayer. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 114, 3627–3643 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07094-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07094-3

Keywords

Navigation