Skip to main content
Log in

Erosion analysis and experimental research of gas-liquid-solid soft abrasive flow polishing based on cavitation effects

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional soft abrasive flow (SAF) polishing is limited by its low material removal rate and its applicability to large workpieces. To address this issue, an innovative technique of a cavitation-based gas-liquid-solid abrasive flow polishing (CGLSP) process is proposed. The energy generated from cavitation effects is employed to increase the kinetic energy of abrasive particles in the fluid flow and the random movement of abrasive particles near the surface. The CGLSP mechanism is first introduced, and then, the cavitation erosion characteristics and material removal mechanism of brittle-plastic materials during polishing are investigated using a coupling computational fluid dynamics model. The simulated results show that erosion of the workpiece surface mainly occurs in the spiral area of the polishing tool. Furthermore, the erosion rate and erosion depth increase with increasing cavitation intensity. Subsequently, polishing experiments are conducted to verify the validity of the CGLSP method. The polishing results are verified by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the polished surface. After polishing with the CGLSP method, most of the surface irregularities, such as microcracks and massive structures, are removed. The experimental results demonstrate that controlled polishing with cavitation erosion and abrasion can achieve a much higher quality surface on a large workpiece.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets and materials used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ρ v :

Vapor phase density

ρ 1 :

Liquid phase density

α v :

Vapor phase volume fraction

α 1 :

Liquid phase volume fraction

u :

Velocity vector

μ :

Dynamic velocity

F :

Reaction force of discrete particles relative to continuous phase in unit volume

t :

Time

F d :

Drag force

F other :

Force acting on particles

u p :

Particle velocity

g :

Gravitational acceleration

ρ p :

Particle density

ρ :

Water density

N :

Number of particles per unit time

m p :

Mass of the particle

v :

Impact velocity of the particle

μ 1 :

Dynamic viscosity

R b :

Radius of vacuole

R c :

Radius of condensation phase

R e :

Radius of evaporation phase

P :

Local pressure of the fluid

P b :

Bubble surface pressure

P :

Medium pressure in the flow field

P v :

Saturated vapor pressure of the medium

n b :

Number of bubbles in a unit liquid volume

v r :

Rebound velocity

v in :

Incoming velocity

e n :

Normal recovery coefficient

e t :

Tangential recovery coefficient

θ :

Impact angle

E(θ):

A unit of material volume removed per mass of particles

n 1, n 2 :

Exponents

s 1, s 2, q 1, q 2 :

Fitting constants

K :

Particle property factor

k 1, k 2 ,k 3 :

Exponent factors

R erosion :

Erosion rate

ER:

Erosion ratio

ρ w :

Density of the target surface materials

A face :

Erosion area

m :

Mass rate of particles impacting the cell surface

ERdepth :

Rate of the erosion depth

T :

A period of fixed-point processing

d :

Dwell point spacing

x 0 :

x-value

References

  1. Beaucamp A, Namba Y (2013) Super-smooth finishing of diamond turned hard X-ray molding dies by combined fluid jet and bonnet polishing. CIRP Annals 62(1):315–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang CJ, Cheung CF, Ho LT, Liu MY, Lee WB (2017) A novel multi-jet polishing process and tool for high-efficiency polishing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 115:60–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fu Y, Gao H, Yan Q, Wang X, Wang X (2020) Rheological characterisation of abrasive media and finishing behaviours in abrasive flow machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107(7):3569–3580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ge JQ, Li C, Gao ZY, Ren YL, Xu XS, Li C, Xie Y (2021) Softness abrasive flow polishing method using constrained boundary vibration. Powder Technol 382:173–187

  5. Ji SM, Tang B, Tan DP, Gong B, Yuan Q, Pan Y (2010) Structured surface softness abrasive flow precision finish machining and its abrasive flow dynamic numerical analysis. Chinese J Mech Eng 46(15):178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao J, Jiang EY, Qi H, Ji SM, Chen Z (2020) A novel polishing method for single-crystal silicon using the cavitation rotary abrasive flow. Precis Eng 61:72–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao J, Huang JF, Wang R, Peng HR, Ji SM (2020) Investigation of the optimal parameters for the surface finish of K9 optical glass using a soft abrasive rotary flow polishing process. J Manuf Process 49:26–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ravi Sankar M, Jain VK, Ramkumar J, Joshi YM (2011) Rheological characterization of styrene-butadiene based medium and its finishing performance using rotational abrasive flow finishing process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(12):947–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li C, Ji SM, Tan DP (2012) Softness abrasive flow method oriented to tiny scale mold structural surface. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 61(9-12):975–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tan DP, Ji SM, Fu YZ (2016) An improved soft abrasive flow finishing method based on fluid collision theory. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(5-8):1261–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen HS, Li J, Chen DR, Wang JD (2008) Damages on steel surface at the incubation stage of the vibration cavitation erosion in water. Wear 265(5-6):692–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brujan EA, Takahira H, Ogasawara T (2019) Planar jets in collapsing cavitation bubbles. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 101:48–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen F, Miao X, Tang Y, Yin S (2017) A review on recent advances in machining methods based on abrasive jet polishing (AJP). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90(1):785–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang L, Wang JS, Tan DP, Yuan ZM (2017) Gas compensation-based abrasive flow processing method for complex titanium alloy surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:3385–3397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ge JQ, Ji SM, Tan DP (2018) A gas-liquid-solid three-phase abrasive flow processing method based on bubble collapsing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(1-4):1069–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sreedhar BK, Albert SK, Pandit AB (2017) Cavitation damage: Theory and measurements – a review. Wear 372-373:177–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Beaucamp A, Katsuura T, Takata K (2018) Process mechanism in ultrasonic cavitation assisted fluid jet polishing. CIRP Annals 67(1):361–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ge JQ, Ren YL, Xu XS, Li C, Li ZA, Xiang WF (2021) Numerical and experimental study on the ultrasonic-assisted soft abrasive flow polishing characteristics, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 112(4):1–19

  19. Toh CK (2007) The use of ultrasonic cavitation peening to improve micro-burr-free surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31(7):688–693

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li L, Qi H, Yin ZC, Li DF, Zhu ZL, Tangwarodomnukun V, Tan DP (2020) Investigation on the multiphase sink vortex Ekman pumping effects by CFD-DEM coupling method. Powder Technol 360:462–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tang T, Gao L, Li B, Liao L, Xi Y, Yang G (2019) Cavitation optimization of a throttle orifice plate based on three-dimensional genetic algorithm and topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 60(3):1227–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hosbach M, Skoda R, Sander T, Leuteritz U, Pfitzner M (2020) On the temperature influence on cavitation erosion in micro-channels. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 117:110140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ansari MA, Samanta A, Behnagh RA, Ding H (2019) An efficient coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian finite element model for friction stir processing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 101(5):1495–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zheng SH, Yu YK, Qiu MZ, Wang LM, Tan DP (2021) A modal analysis of vibration response of a cracked fluid-filled cylindrical shell. Appl Math Model 91:934–958

  25. Nguyen VB, Nguyen QB, Zhang YW, Lim CYH, Khoo BC (2016) Effect of particle size on erosion characteristics. Wear 348-349:126–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Duarte CAR, de Souza FJ (2017) Innovative pipe wall design to mitigate elbow erosion: A CFD analysis. Wear 380-381:176–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Messa GV, Malavasi S (2018) A CFD-based method for slurry erosion prediction. Wear 398-399:127–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zahedi P, Zhang J, Arabnejad H, McLaury BS, Shirazi SA (2017) CFD simulation of multiphase flows and erosion predictions under annular flow and low liquid loading conditions. Wear 376-377:1260–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ji SM, Cao HQ, Zhao J, Pan Y, Jiang EY (2018) Soft abrasive flow polishing based on the cavitation effect. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 101(5-8):1865–1878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ge JQ, Ji SM, Tan DP (2017) A gas-liquid-solid three-phase abrasive flow processing method based on bubble collapsing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(1-4):1069–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li L, Lu JF, Fang H, Yin ZC, Wang T, Wang RH, Fan XH, Zhao LJ, Tan DP, Wan YH (2020) Lattice Boltzmann method for fluid-thermal systems: status, hotspots, trends and outlook. IEEE Access 8:27649–27675

  32. Tan DP, Li L, Zhu YL, Zheng S, Yin ZC, Li DF (2019) Critical penetration condition and Ekman suction-extraction mechanism of a sink vortex. J Zhejiang Univ - SCI A 20(1):61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ji SM, Weng XX, Tan DP (2012) Analytical method of softness abrasive two-phase flow field based on 2D model of LSM. Acta Physica Sinica 61(1):7

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zeng X, Ji SM, Tan DP, Jin MS, Wen DH, Zhang L (2013) Softness consolidation abrasives material removal characteristic oriented to laser hardening surface. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(9-12):2323–2332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fan XH, Tan DP, Li L, Yin ZC, Wang T(2021) Hybrid modeling and solution method of gas-liquid-solid three-phase particle flow . Acta Phys Sin (Article in press)

  36. Tan DP, Li L, Yin ZC, Li DF, Zhu YL, Zheng S (2020) Ekman boundary layer mass transfer mechanism of free sink vortex. Int J Heat Mass Transf 150:119250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tan DP, Yang T, Zhao J, Ji SM (2016) Free sink vortex Ekman suction-extraction evolution mechanism. Acta Physica Sinica 65(5):12

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhao J, Huang JF, Xiang YC, Wang R, Xu XQ, Ji SM, Hang W (2021) Effect of a protective coating on the surface integrity of a microchannel produced by microultrasonic machining. J Manuf Processes 61:280–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Di Felice R (1994) The voidage function for fluid-particle interaction systems. Int J Multiphase Flow 20(1):153–159

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Rayleigh L (1917) On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity. Philos Mag 34(200):94–98

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Sauer J (2001) Schnerr GH (2000) Development of a new cavitation model based on bubble dynamics. Z Angew Math Mech 81:561–562

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Feng X, Lu J (2019) Effects of balanced skew and biased skew on the cavitation characteristics and pressure fluctuations of the marine propeller. Ocean Eng 184:184–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Forder A, Thew M, Harrison D (1998) A numerical investigation of solid particle erosion experienced within oilfield control valves. Wear 216(2):184–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Oka YI, Okamura K, Yoshida T (2005) Practical estimation of erosion damage caused by solid particle impact: Part 1: Effects of impact parameters on a predictive equation. Wear 259(1):95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang Y, Reuterfors EP, McLaury BS, Shirazi SA, Rybicki EF (2007) Comparison of computed and measured particle velocities and erosion in water and air flows. Wear 263:330–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Farokhipour A, Mansoori Z, Saffar-Avval M, Ahmadi G (2020) 3D computational modeling of sand erosion in gas-liquid-particle multiphase annular flows in bends. Wear 450-451:203241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Li L, Tan DP, Wang T, Yin ZC, Fan XH, Wang RH (2021) Multiphase coupling mechanism of free surface vortex and the vibration-based sensing method. Energy 216:119136

  48. Zhang LB, Lv HP, Tan DP, Xu F, Chen JL, Bao GJ, Cai SB (2018) Adaptive quantum genetic algorithm for task sequence planning of complex assembly systems. Electron Lett 54(14):870–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tan DP, Ni YS, Zhang LB (2017) Two-phase sink vortex suction mechanism and penetration dynamic characteristics in ladle teeming process. J Iron Steel Res Int 24(7):669–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang JX, Gao SB, Tang ZJ, Tan DP, Cao B, Fan J (2021) A context-aware recommendation system for improving manufacturing process modeling. J Intell Manuf (Article in press)

  51. Wang JX, Cao B, Zheng X, Tan DP, Fan J (2019) Detecting difference between process models using edge network. IEEE Access PP(99):1–1

  52. Jiang QS, Tan DP, Li YB, Ji SM, Cai CP, Zheng QM (2020) Object detection and classification of metal polishing shaft surface defects based on convolutional neural network deep learning. Appl Sci-Basel 10(1):30

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wang YY, Zhang YL, Tan, DP, Zhang YC (2021) Key Technologies and Development Trends in Advanced Intelligent Sawing Equipments. Chin J Mech Eng 34:30

  54. Zhang HJ, Chen XY, Gong YF, Tian YT, McDonald A, Li H (2020) In-situ SEM observations of ultrasonic cavitation erosion behavior of HVOF-sprayed coatings. Ultrason Sonochem 60:104760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ding ZX, Chen W, Wang Q (2011) Resistance of cavitation erosion of multimodal WC-12Co coatings sprayed by HVOF. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 21(10):2231–2236

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Code availability

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 51775501 and 51575494, the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province under Grant No. LR16E050001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Man Ge is responsible for methodology, investigation, software, writing, and editing. Shiming Ji and Dapeng Tan are responsible for funding support, algorithm implementation, supervision, and validation. Huiqiang Cao is responsible for methodology discussion and manuscript refinement.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dapeng Tan.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All authors confirm that they follow all ethical guidelines.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

The manuscript is approved by all authors for publication; all the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ge, M., Ji, S., Tan, D. et al. Erosion analysis and experimental research of gas-liquid-solid soft abrasive flow polishing based on cavitation effects. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 114, 3419–3436 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06752-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06752-w

Keywords

Navigation