Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Machining process modeling of green alumina ceramics in orthogonal cutting and fragmentation process

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theories on mechanical model and discrete element model (DEM) of machining green ceramics are sought to reveal the material removal mechanisms and cutting force. Theoretical models are based on brittle fracture mechanics, equilibrium, and minimum chipping energy principle etc., and in the model, friction on flank face of tools and material’s rebound deformation are considered. DEM is established based on macro-mechanical properties of green alumina ceramics. Orthogonal cutting experiments were conducted to validate the mechanical model and DEM. Results show that the material removal mechanism of green alumina ceramics contains both crushing failure and chipping failure. The experiments validate good agreement with mechanical model and DEM in regard to chip formation and tangential cutting force. Friction force during machining green alumina ceramics contributes more than 50% of tangential cutting force. It is the reason that there exists more serious flank wear of cutting tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

References

  1. Onler R, Korkmaz E, Kate K, Chinn RE, Atre SV, Ozdoganlar OB (2019) Green micromachining of ceramics using tungsten carbide micro-endmills. J Mater Process Technol 267:268–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhattacharya B, Doloi BN, Sorkhel SK (1999) Experimental investigations into electrochemical discharge machining (ECDM) of non-conductive ceramic materials. J Mater Process Technol 95:145–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xing YQ, Deng JX, Wu Z, Wu FF (2017) High friction and low wear properties of laser-textured ceramic surface under dry friction. Opt Laser Technol 93:24–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu YY, Deng JX, Wu FF, Duan R, Zhang X, Hou YH (2017) Wear resistance of carbide tools with textured flank-faced in dry cutting of green alumina ceramics. Wear 372-373:91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deng JX, Yun DL, Tan YQ (2009) Design, fabrication and performance of Al2O3/(W0.7Ti0.3)C+Al2O3/TiC multilayered ceramic nozzles. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 27:734–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xing YQ, Liu L, Wu Z, Wang XS, Huang P, Tang L (2018) Fabrication and characterization of micro-channels on Al2O3/TiC ceramic produced by nanosecond laser. Ceram Int 44:23035–23044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thoe TB, Aspinwall DK, Killey N (1999) Combined ultrasonic and electrical discharge machining of ceramic coated nickel alloy. J Mater Process Technol 92-93:323–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Feng PF, Wang JJ, Zhang JF, Zheng JZ (2017) Drilling induced tearing defects in rotary ultrasonic machining of C/SiC composites. Ceram Int 43:791–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu YY, Deng JX, Wang W, Duan R, Men R, Ge DL, Li XM (2018) Effect of texture parameters on cutting performance of flank-faced textured carbide tools in dry cutting of green Al2O3 ceramics. Ceram Int 44:13205–13217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohanty S, Rameshbabu AP, Dhara S (2013) Net shape forming of green alumina via CNC machining using diamond embedded tool. Ceram Int 39:8985–8993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yin L, Peng HX, Dhara S, Yang L, Su B (2009) Natural additives in protein coagulation casting process for improved microstructural controllability of cellular ceramics. Compos Part B-Eng 40:638–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu YY, Deng JX, Liu LL, Wang W, Meng R, Duan R, Ge DL (2018) Effect of nano-scale texture pretreatment on wear resistance of WC/Co tools with/without TiAlN coated flank-face in dry turning of green Al2O3 ceramics. Ceram Int 44:21176–21187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu ZL, Miao K, Zhu WJ, Chen Y, Xia YL, Li DC (2018) Fractions design of irregular particles in suspensions for the fabrication of multiscale ceramic components by gelcasting. J Eur Ceram Soc 38:671–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ng SH, Hull JB, Henshall JL (2006) Machining of novel alumina/cyanoacrylate green ceramic compacts. J Mater Process Technol 175:299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dadhich P, Srivas PK, Mohanty S, Dhara S (2015) Microfabrication of green ceramics: contact vs. non-contact machining. J Eur Ceram Soc 35:3909–3916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wardany TE, Barth R, Holowczak J, Tredway W (2009) Optimum process parameters to produce green ceramic complex parts. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 58:109–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mohanty S, Rameshbabu AP, Mandal S, Su S, Dhara S (2013) Critical issues in near net shape forming via green machining of ceramics: a case study of alumina dental crown. J Asian Ceram Soc 1:274–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu YY, Liu LL, Deng JX, Meng R, Zou XQ, Wu FF (2017) Fabrication of micro-scale textured grooves on green ZrO2 ceramics by pulsed laser ablation. Ceram Int 43:6519–6531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Su B, Dhara S, Wang L (2008) Green ceramic machining: a top-down approach for the rapid fabrication of complex-shaped ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 28:2109–2115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yin L, Peng HX, Yang L, Su B (2008) Fabrication of three dimensional inter-connective porous ceramics via ceramic green machining and bonding. J Eur Ceram Soc 28:531–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kamboj RK, Dhara S, Bhargava P (2003) Machining behavior of green gelcast ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 23:1005–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shinohara N, Okumiya M (1999) Formation mechanisms of processing defects and their relevance to the strength in alumina ceramics made by powder compaction process. J Mater Sci 34:4271–4277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu YY, Deng JX, Yue HZ, Duan R, Li XM, Ehmann KF (2019) Material removal behavior in processing green Al2O3 ceramics based on scratch and edge-indentation tests. Ceram Int 45:12495–12508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Martin CL, Bouvard D, Shima S (2003) Study of particle rearrangement during powder compaction by the discrete element method. J Mech Phys Solids 51:667–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reed JS (1995) Principles of ceramics processing. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Che DM, Zhu WL, Ehmann KF (2016) Chipping and crushing mechanisms in orthogonal rock cutting. Int J Mech Sci 119:224–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Evans I (1965) The force required to cut coal with blunt wedges. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 2:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Merchant ME (1945) Mechanics of the metal cutting process. I. Orthogonal cutting and a type 2 chip. J Appl Phys 16:267–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Boothroyd G, Knight WA (1989) Fundamentals of machining and machine tools. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Liu YY, Deng JX, Wang W, Duan R, Xing YQ (2019) Characterization of green Al2O3 ceramics surface machined by tools with textures on flank-face in dry turning. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 16:1159–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nishimatsu Y (1972) The mechanics of rock cutting. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 9:261–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tan YQ, Yang DM, Sheng Y (2008) Study of polycrystalline Al2O3 machining cracks using discrete element method. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:975–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Potyondy DO, Cundall PA (2004) A bonded-particle model for rock. Int J Rock Mech Min 41:1329–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Almond EA, McCormick NJ (1986) Constant-geometry edge-flaking of brittle materials. Nature 321:53–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gogotsi G, Mudrik S, Galenko V (2007) Evaluation of fracture resistance of ceramics: edge fracture tests. Ceram Int 33:315–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by the Key Research and Development Projects of Shandong Province (2019TSLH0315), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2018ZB0522), and the fellowship of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M681699).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yayun Liu is the first author, who writes the manuscript, and performs the experiment and the data analyses.

Jianxin Deng is the corresponding author, who contributes to the conception of the study and supplies funding for this study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianxin Deng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The paper is original and has not been published before and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.

Consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent to publish

Not applicable

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

So the resultant Ft generated by the tensile stress is calculated as Fp in Eq. 1, i.e.,

$$ \left\{\begin{array}{c}{\overrightarrow{F}}_t=w{\int}_o^{2a}\left(\overrightarrow{i} sin\theta +\overrightarrow{j} cos\theta \right){\sigma}_t Rd\theta =w{\sigma}_tR\left[\left(\overrightarrow{j}\mathit{\sin }2a-\overrightarrow{i}\left(\mathit{\cos}2a-1\right)\right)\right]\\ {}R=\frac{\overline{BD}}{2\mathit{\sin}\ a}=\frac{a_p}{2{\mathit{\sin}}^2\ a}\\ {}\mathrm{where}\kern0.5em \overline{BD}=\frac{a_p}{\mathit{\sin}\ a}\end{array}\right. $$
(21)

where R and a are the radius and half angle of arc boundary BD of chunk-like chips respectively, \( \overline{BD} \) stands for the length of line BD, and ap means the depth of cut. So, the value of Ft is rewritten, i.e.,

$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}{F}_t=\left|{\overrightarrow{F}}_t\right|=w{\sigma}_t\frac{a_p}{2{\mathit{\sin}}^2\ a}\sqrt{{\mathit{\sin}}^2(2a)+{\left(\mathit{\cos}2a-1\right)}^2}\\ {}=w{\sigma}_t\frac{a_p}{\sin a}\end{array}} $$
(22)

According to the assumption above, the equilibrium of moments in terms of Fp and Ft at point B before the chunk-like chips detachment is calculated:

$$ \left\{\begin{array}{c}{F}_t\times \overline{BC}-{F}_p\times \overline{AB}=0\\ {}\overline{BC}=\frac{a_p}{2\sin a}\\ {}\overline{AB}=\frac{d}{2\mathit{\sin}\frac{\alpha_o+{\theta}_t}{2}}+\frac{a_p}{\sin a}\mathit{\cos}\left(\frac{\alpha_o+{\theta}_t}{2}+a\right)\end{array}\right. $$
(23)

Combining Eqs. 2223, besides the ratio of d to depth of cut ap is always non-negative, the ratio is given:

$$ \left\{\begin{array}{c}\frac{d}{a_p}=\frac{\frac{-2\mathit{\sin}\left(\frac{\alpha_o+{\theta}_t}{2}\right)\mathit{\cos}\left(\frac{\alpha_o+{\theta}_t}{2}+a\right)}{\mathit{\sin}\ a}+\sqrt{\Delta}}{2}\\ {}\Delta =\frac{4{\mathit{\sin}}^2\left(\frac{\alpha_o+{\theta}_t}{2}\right)}{{\mathit{\sin}}^2a}\left[{\mathit{\cos}}^2\left(\frac{\alpha_o+{\theta}_t}{2}+a\right)+\frac{\sigma_t}{\sigma_p}\right]\end{array}\right. $$
(24)

To get the ratio of d to depth of cut ap, half angle a of arc boundary BD of chunk-like chips should be obtained. According to the minimum energy principle [28], a can be determined:

$$ \left\{\begin{array}{c}\frac{\partial (E)}{\partial a}=0\\ {}E={F}_xL\\ {}{F}_x={K}_{pi}\left|\overrightarrow{i}\bullet \overrightarrow{F_p}\right|+{F}_f={k}_{pi}w{\sigma}_p{a}_p\frac{d}{a_p}+{F}_f\end{array}\right. $$
(25)

where E is the energy of chipping, Fx and Ff are the tangential cutting force and friction force respectively during processing, and Ff is one of main parts of tangential cutting force, which is introduced on the interface between flank face of cutting tools and surfaces of green ceramics, and it will be studied in the later section including friction coefficient. L is the cutting distance. kpi is the force factor of Fp in horizontal directions, 0 < kpi ≤ 1, which is related with material properties. kpi is also in response to the analysis of rebound deformation during processing in Section 2.1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Deng, J. Machining process modeling of green alumina ceramics in orthogonal cutting and fragmentation process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113, 1009–1027 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06591-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06591-9

Keywords

Navigation