Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Heat transfer simulation and improvement of autoclave loading in composites manufacturing

  • Application
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Composite manufacturing has proven to be a quintessential process for the improvement of a spectrum of industries from medical to automotive, and aerospace. Most composite manufacturing processes include a two-step process, lay-up, and autoclave curing. The autoclave process is often long and expensive. Therefore, improving its efficiency can reduce the production cost and increase the throughput significantly. However, there is a scarcity of studies in the literature that tackle production improvement of vacuum bag/autoclave molding processes. Thus, in this paper, in collaboration with an industry partner, the effect of quantity, location, and orientation of parts inside an autoclave on the curing cycle is investigated both computationally and experimentally. The objective is to improve the production rate without compromising quality. The quality of parts is being represented by their heat-up rate throughout the curing cycle. The results showed that, for a specific scenario, doubling the number of parts inside the autoclave could slow down the heat transfer without significantly affecting the heat-up rates. As a result, the lag could be negligible for the increase in the production rate that it provides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Available in the “data deposition” file attached.

References

  1. Lee S-Y, Springer GS (1988) Effects of cure on the mechanical properties of composites. J Compos Mater 22(1):15–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199838802200102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Peters PWM (1994) Influence of cure temperature and degree of surface treatment on transverse cracking and fibre/matrix bond strength in CFRP. J Compos Mater 28(6):507–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839402800602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Gernaat, S. Alavi-Soltani, M. Guzman, A. Rodriguez, B. Minaie, and J. Welch, “Correlation between viscoelastic and mechanical properties for an out-of-autoclave polymer composite,” 2009

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alavi-Soltani S, Sabzevari S, Koushyar H, Minaie B (2012) Thermal, rheological, and mechanical properties of a polymer composite cured at different isothermal cure temperatures. J Compos Mater 46(5):575–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998311415443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cao Y, Cameron J (2007) The effect of curing conditions on the properties of silica modified glass fiber reinforced epoxy composite. J Reinf Plast Compos 26(1):41–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684407069950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. White SR, Kim YK (1996) Staged curing of composite materials. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 27(3):219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-835X(95)00023-U

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bowles KJ, Frimpong S (1992) Void effects on the interlaminar shear strength of unidirectional graphite-fiber-reinforced composites. J Compos Mater 26(10):1487–1509. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839202601006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tang C, Li Y, Dong X, He B (2020) A generalized alternating linearization bundle method for structured convex optimization with inexact first-order oracles. Algorithms 13(4):Art. no. 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/a13040091

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Boey FYC, Lye SW (1992) Void reduction in autoclave processing of thermoset composites: part 1: high pressure effects on void reduction. Composites 23(4):261–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(92)90186-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu L, Zhang B-M, Wang D-F, Wu Z-J (2006) Effects of cure cycles on void content and mechanical properties of composite laminates. Compos Struct 73(3):303–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Olivier P, Cottu JP, Ferret B (1995) Effects of cure cycle pressure and voids on some mechanical properties of carbon/epoxy laminates. Composites 26(7):509–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(95)96808-J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boey FYC, Lye SW (1990) Effects of vacuum and pressure in an autoclave curing process for a thermosetting fibre-reinforced composite. J Mater Process Technol 23(2):121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(90)90152-K

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo Z-S, Liu L, Zhang B-M, Du S (2009) Critical void content for thermoset composite laminates. J Compos Mater 43(17):1775–1790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998306065289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mouritz AP (2000) Ultrasonic and interlaminar properties of highly porous composites. J Compos Mater 34(3):218–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199830003400303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Müller De Almeida SF, Chaves De Mas Santacreu A (1995) Environmental effects in composite laminates with voids. Polym Polym Compos 3(3):193–204

    Google Scholar 

  16. Costa ML, Rezende MC, De Almeida SFM (2005) Strength of hygrothermally conditioned polymer composites with voids. J Compos Mater 39(21):1943–1961. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998305051807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Koushyar H, Alavi-Soltani S, Minaie B, Violette M (2012) Effects of variation in autoclave pressure, temperature, and vacuum-application time on porosity and mechanical properties of a carbon fiber/epoxy composite. J Compos Mater 46(16):1985–2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998311429618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Struzziero G, Skordos AA (2017) Multi-objective optimisation of the cure of thick components. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 93:126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.11.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Q, Wang L, Zhu W, Xu Q, Ke Y (2017) Design optimization of molds for autoclave process of composite manufacturing. J Reinf Plast Compos 36(21):1564–1576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684417718265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu J, Zhan L, Yang X, Shen R, He J, Peng N (2020) Temperature optimization of mold for autoclave process of large composite manufacturing. J Phys Conf Ser 1549:032086. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1549/3/032086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kluge N, Lundström T, Ljung A-L, Westerberg L, Nyman T (2016) An experimental study of temperature distribution in an autoclave. J Reinf Plast Compos 35(7):566–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684415624768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bohne T, Frerich T, Jendrny J, Jürgens J-P, Ploshikhin V (2018) Simulation and validation of air flow and heat transfer in an autoclave process for definition of thermal boundary conditions during curing of composite parts. J Compos Mater 52(12):1677–1687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998317729210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Slesinger N, Shimizu T, Arafath ARA, Poursartip A Heat transfer coefficient distribution inside an autoclave:10

  24. Sturrock NS (1971) Localized boundary-layer heat transfer from external building surfaces. PhD Thesis, University of Liverpool

  25. Rowley FB, Eckley WA (1932) Surface coefficients as affected by wind direction. ASHRAE Trans 38:33–46

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Department, California State Polytechnic University, 3801 W Temple Ave, Pomona, CA, 91768, USA

    Shokoufeh Mirzaei, Charbel Al Kobtawy, Jeffrey Roberts & Eric Palmer

  2. Industrial, Systems, and Manufacturing Engineering Department, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, USA

    Krishna Krishnan

Authors
  1. Shokoufeh Mirzaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Krishna Krishnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Charbel Al Kobtawy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeffrey Roberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Eric Palmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work with the order provided.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shokoufeh Mirzaei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Code availability

Available in the “data deposition” file attached.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mirzaei, S., Krishnan, K., Al Kobtawy, C. et al. Heat transfer simulation and improvement of autoclave loading in composites manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 112, 2989–3000 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06573-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06573-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation