Skip to main content
Log in

Preliminary geometrical and microstructural characterization of WC-reinforced NiCrBSi matrix composites fabricated by plasma transferred arc additive manufacturing through Taguchi-based experimentation

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metal matrix composites enhance the wear and corrosion properties of components in heavy-duty industries. This work reports the preliminary effects of process parameters such as current, linear speed, powder flow rate, nozzle angle, powder gas, shield gas, and center gas at the macro-scale and micro-scale of single-track multiple-layer depositions. The use of plasma transferred arc as an additive manufacturing system yields enough energy for a fast solidification rate of the matrix without compromising the carbide in the composite. The results show that the bead height is mainly affected by the powder flow rate, the powder gas, and the travel speed at the macro-scale. The bead width has a close relationship with powder flow rate, powder gas, and current, the latter contributing to the formation of a slumping phenomenon due to heat accumulation. The volumetric deposition is affected by similar parameters to the bead height. At the micro-scale, the process parameters did not show significant carbide changes but demonstrate its homogeneous distribution. The electron microscope observation exhibited the composite’s high quality due to the fast solidification of the process. The results demonstrate that the porosity is mainly affected by the powder flow rate. By understanding the preliminary contribution of process parameters, this manufacturing process can print near net-shaped parts minimizing the post-processing of metal additive manufacturing components. Therefore, this work contributes to implementing a preliminary experimental methodology to understand the deposition process of WC-reinforced composites in plasma transferred arc additive manufacturing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data and material are available under request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Kalpakjian S, Schmid SR (2001) Manufacturing engineering and technology. Pearson. ISBN 9780135228609

  2. Mercado Rojas JG, Wolfe T, Fleck BA, Qureshi AJ (2018) Plasma transferred arc additive manufacturing of Nickel metal matrix composites. Manufacturing Letters. ISSN 22138463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2018.10.001

  3. Wu P, Du HM, Chen XL, Li ZQ, Bai HL, Jiang EY (2004) Influence of WC particle behavior on the wear resistance properties of Ni-WC composite coatings. Wear 257(1-2):142–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2003.10.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. ASTM-F3187 (2016) Standard guide for DED of metals

  5. Dass A, Moridi A (2019) State of the art in directed energy deposition: from additive manufacturing to materials design. Coatings 9(7):418. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9070418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Artaza T, Alberdi A, Murua M, Gorrotxategi J, Frías J, Puertas G, Melchor MA, Mugica D, Suárez A (2017) Design and integration of WAAM technology and in situ monitoring system in a gantry machine. Procedia Manufacturing 13:778–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thompson S M, Bian L, Shamsaei N, Yadollahi A (2015) An overview of direct laser deposition for additive manufacturing; part I: transport phenomena, modeling and diagnostics. Additive Manufacturing 8:36–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang H, Jiang W, Valant M, Kovacevic R (2003) Microplasma powder deposition as a new solid freeform fabrication process. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 217(12):1641–1650. https://doi.org/10.1243/095440503772680578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Montgomery DC (2019) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma A, Arora N, Mishra BK (2008) A practical approach towards mathematical modeling of deposition rate during twin-wire submerged arc welding. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 36(5-6):463–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0847-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Juang SC, Tarng YS (2002) Process parameter selection for optimizing the weld pool geometry in the tungsten inert gas welding of stainless steel. J Mater Process Technol 122(1):33–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00021-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alam MK, Urbanic RJ, Nazemi N, Edrisy A (2018) Predictive modeling and the effect of process parameters on the hardness and bead characteristics for laser-cladded stainless steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(1-4):397–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0898-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nazemi N, Urbanic J, Alam M (2017) Hardness and residual stress modeling of powder injection laser cladding of P420 coating on AISI 1018 substrate. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(9-12):3485–3503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0760-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mondal S, Bandyopadhyay A, Pal PK (2014) Application of artificial neural network for the prediction of laser cladding process characteristics at Taguchi-based optimized condition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(9-12):2151–2158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5393-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dasgupta B, Bhadury P (2014) Optimization of weld bead parameters of nickel based overlay deposited by plasma transferred arc surfacing with adequacy test. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications 4(7):201–206

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wilden J, Bergmann JP, Frank H (2006) Plasma transferred arc welding–modeling and experimental optimization. J Therm Spray Tech 15(4):779–784. https://doi.org/10.1361/105996306X146767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Parekh R, Buddu RK, Patel RI (2016) Multiphysics simulation of laser cladding process to study the effect of process parameters on clad geometry. Procedia Technology 23:529–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.03.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Saqib SM, Urbanic RJ (2017) Investigation of the transient characteristics for laser cladding beads using 420 stainless steel powder. J Manuf Sci Eng 139(8):081009. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Obidigbo C, Tatman E-P, Gockel J (2019) Processing parameter and transient effects on melt pool geometry in additive manufacturing of Invar 36. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 104(5-8):3139–3146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04229-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moghazi S, Wolfe T, Ivey D, Henein H (2020) Plasma transfer arc additive manufacturing of 17-4 ph: assessment of defects. The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology. In press

  21. Beuth J, Klingbeil N (2001) The role of process variables in laser-based direct metal solid freeform fabrication. Jom 53(9):36–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-001-0067-y. ISSN 10474838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fathi A, Toyserkani E, Khajepour A, Durali M (2006) Prediction of melt pool depth and dilution in laser powder deposition. J Phys D Appl Phys 39(12):2613–2623. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/39/12/022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Qi H, Azer M, Singh P (2010) Adaptive toolpath deposition method for laser net shape manufacturing and repair of turbine compressor airfoils. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48(1-4):121–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2265-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Angelastro A, Campanelli SL, Casalino G, Ludovico AD (2013) Optimization of Ni-based WC/Co/Cr composite coatings produced by multilayer laser cladding. Adv Mater Sci Eng, 2013, p 2. ISSN 16878434. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/615464

  25. Amine T, Newkirk JW, Liou F (2014) An investigation of the effect of direct metal deposition parameters on the characteristics of the deposited layers. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 3(9-12):21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2014.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Saqib S, Urbanic RJ, Aggarwal K (2014) Analysis of Laser Cladding Bead Morphology for Developing Additive Manufacturing Travel Paths. Procedia CIRP 17:824–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Demir AG (2018) Micro laser metal wire deposition for additive manufacturing of thin-walled structures. Opt Lasers Eng 100(2018):9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2017.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Prado-Cerqueira JL, Diéguez JL, Camacho AM (2017) Preliminary development of a wire and arc additive manufacturing system (WAAM). Procedia Manufacturing 13:895–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liberini M, Astarita A, Campatelli G, Scippa A, Montevecchi F, Venturini G, Durante M, Boccarusso L, Minutolo FMC, Squillace A (2017) Selection of optimal process parameters for wire arc additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 62:470–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.06.124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ryan EM, Sabin TJ, Watts JF, Whiting MJ (2018) The influence of build parameters and wire batch on porosity of wire and arc additive manufactured aluminium alloy 2319. J Mater Process Technol 262 (April):577–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.07.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang C, Li Y, Gao M, Zeng X (2018) Wire arc additive manufacturing of Al-6Mg alloy using variable polarity cold metal transfer arc as power source. Mater Sci Eng A 711(August 2017):415–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.11.084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jhavar S, Jain NK, Paul CP (2014) Development of micro-plasma transferred arc (μ-PTA) wire deposition process for additive layer manufacturing applications. J Mater Process Technol 214(5):1102–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.12.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sawant MS, Jain NK (2018) Investigations on additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V by microplasma transferred arc powder deposition process. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME 140(8):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Martina F, Mehnen J, Williams SW, Colegrove P, Wang F (2012) Investigation of the benefits of plasma deposition for the additive layer manufacture of Ti-6Al-4V. J Mater Process Technol 212(6):1377–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gockel J, Beuth J, Taminger K (2014) Integrated control of solidification microstructure and melt pool dimensions in electron beam wire feed additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V. Additive Manufacturing 1-4:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2014.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Aiyiti W, Zhao W, Lu B, Tang Y (2006) Investigation of the overlapping parameters of MPAW-based rapid prototyping. Rapid Prototyp J 12(3):165–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540610670744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Xiong J, Yin Z, Zhang W (2016) Forming appearance control of arc striking and extinguishing area in multi-layer single-pass GMAW-based additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(1-4):579–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8543-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Venturini G, Montevecchi F, Bandini F, Scippa A, Campatelli G (2018) Feature based three axes computer aided manufacturing software for wire arc additive manufacturing dedicated to thin walled components. Additive Manufacturing 22(May):643–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Metco O (2019) Material product data sheet monocrystalline tungsten carbide/nickel chromium boron silicon powder for plasma transferred arc (PTA ). Oerlikon Metco

  40. NACE (2006) Joint surface preparation standard near-white metal blast cleaning. Technical Report 21066, NACE International

  41. ASTM (2005) A36-A36M19 standard specification for carbon structural steel. Technical report, ASTM

  42. Apte PR (2001) Why/when is Taguchi method appropriate? chapter 5: Taguchi method sn-ratio for quality characteristics approaching IDEAL value

  43. Mukherjee T, Manvatkar V, De A, DebRoy T (2017) Mitigation of thermal distortion during additive manufacturing. Scr Mater 127:79–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cunningham CR, Flynn JM, Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Newman ST (2018) Invited review article: strategies and processes for high quality wire arc additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing 22 (June):672–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wu B, Ding D, Pan Z, Cuiuri D, Li H, Han J, Fei Z (2017) Effects of heat accumulation on the arc characteristics and metal transfer behavior in wire arc additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V. J Mater Process Technol 250(December 2016):304–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.07.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sames WJ, List FA, Pannala S, Dehoff RR, Babu SS (2016) The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing. Int Mater Rev 61(5):315–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2015.1116649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Everton SK, Hirsch M, Stavroulakis PI, Leach RK, Clare AT (2016) Review of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing. Mater Des 95:431–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.099

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) grant numbers RGPIN-2016-04689, CRDPJ 514752-17. Innotech Alberta, under the intern project ATS-2017-IN-028. The Mexican National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT), under the register 234809 and 440868. Tecnologico de Monterrey, under its program of professor in development.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization - Ahmed Jawad Qureshi, Tonya Wolfe, and Jose Guadalupe Mercado Roja

Formal analysis - Jose Guadalupe Mercado Rojas and Morteza Ghasri-Khouzani

Investigation - Jose Guadalupe Mercado Rojas

Methodology - Jose Guadalupe Mercado Rojas and Ahmed Jawad Qureshi

Resources - Tonya Wolfe and Hani Henein

Supervision - Ahmed Jawad Qureshi, Tonya Wolfe, and Brian Fleck

Validation - Jose Guadalupe Mercado Rojas, Ahmed Qureshi

Writing: original draft - Jose Guadalupe Mercado Rojas

Writing: review and editing - Ahmed Jawad Qureshi, Tonya Wolfe, and Brian Fleck

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Jawad Qureshi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rojas, J.G.M., Ghasri-Khouzani, M., Wolfe, T. et al. Preliminary geometrical and microstructural characterization of WC-reinforced NiCrBSi matrix composites fabricated by plasma transferred arc additive manufacturing through Taguchi-based experimentation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113, 1451–1468 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06388-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06388-2

Keywords

Navigation