Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Formation mechanism of surface metamorphic layer and influence rule on milling TC17 titanium alloy

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To control the surface metamorphic layer and improve the performance of the workpiece, a combination of measurement and simulation is employed to obtain the force and temperature fields in TC17 milling. Based on the thermo-mechanical coupling, the formation mechanism of the surface metamorphic layer is analyzed. In addition, the influence of parameters on the surface characteristics is also studied. The results show that the milling force varies from 58.39 to 170.7 N, the temperature effect layer increases from 102 μm to 210 μm, and the effective strain layer increases from 38 μm to 145 μm within the experiment parameters. The thermal-mechanical coupling has a significant effect on residual stress. The surface compressive residual stress varies from − 206 to − 314 MPa, and the residual stress layer depth fluctuates by 30 μm. With the enhancement of thermal-mechanical coupling, the microhardness fluctuation does not exceed 20HV0.025, and the maximum microhardness can reach 384HV0.025. Moreover, the microhardness effected layer remains at 40 μm regardless of parameters enhanced, revealing that microhardness is insensitive to the process parameters. The plastic deformation layer depth alternates between 17 and 28 μm, indicating that it is little affected by thermal-mechanical coupling. Finally, the established model can accurately predict surface roughness and residual stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen Y, Pei CH, Li ZX, Gao F, Li SQ (2013) Dynamic mechanical behavior of α+β titanium alloys at high strain rate. J Aeronaut Mater 33(6):8–12

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhopale NN, Pawade RS, Joshi SS (2017) Surface quality analysis in ball end milling of Inconel 718 cantilevers by response surface methodology. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 231(4):628–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tayisepi N, Laubscher RF (2016) Investigating the energy efficiency and surface integrity when machining titanium alloys. Int Conf Comp Manuf 16:219–224

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou ZT, Cui J, Chen ZT (2015) Experimental research on surface integrity of TB6 titanium alloy. Aeronaut Manuf Technol 477(8):66–69

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huai WB, Lin XJ, Shi YY (2020) Geometric characteristic modeling for flexible contact of sanding wheel–polished complex surface. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 110(7):1691–1700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huai WB, Shi YY, Tang H, Lin XJ (2019) An adaptive flexible polishing path programming method of the blisk blade using elastic grinding tools. J Mech Sci Technol 33(7):3487–3495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abbas AT, Sharma N, Anwar S et al. (2019) Towards optimization of surface roughness and productivity aspects during high-speed machining of Ti-6Al-4V. Materials 12(22):37–49

  8. Chien VN, Chour HS, Nguyen HT (2018) Multi-objective optimization of surface roughness and cutting forces in hard milling using Taguchi and response surface methodology. Key Eng Mater 773:220–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guan CM, Li X, Luo Y et al (2017) Milling parameters optimization for finish machining TB6 based on machined surface integrity. Aeronaut Manuf Technol 1:55–59

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rajguru R, Vasudevan H (2019) Investigation of the impact of cutting parameters on surface integrity in the end milling of Inconel 625. Mater Ence Forum 969:762–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang Y, Li L, Rong B et al (2016) Testing and analysis of milling surface residual stress in TC4 titanium alloy bar parts. Mach Build Autom 45(2):25–27

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang B, Liu ZQ (2018) Influences of tool structure, tool material and tool wear on machined surface integrity during turning and milling of titanium and nickel alloys: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98:1925–1975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li J, Ren CZ, Yang XY et al (2016) Effects of milling parameters on surface integrity of titanium alloy(Ti-6Al-4V). J Mach Des 4:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  14. Akinlabi ET, Mathoho I, Mubiayi MP (2019) Corrosion behaviour and microhardness during dry and flood milling of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Key Eng Mater 796:91–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu DX, Yao CF, Zhang DH (2018) Surface characterization and fatigue evaluation in GH4169 superalloy: comparing results after finish turning; shot peening and surface polishing treatments. Int J Fatigue 113:222–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang XY, Huang CZ, Zou B, Liu G, Zhu H, Wang J (2018) Experimental study of surface integrity and fatigue life in the face milling of inconel 718. Front Mech Eng 13(2):243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Patil S, Jadhav S, Kekade S, Supare A, Powar A, Singh RKP (2016) The influence of cutting heat on the surface integrity during machining of titanium alloy Ti6Al4V. Procedia Manuf 5:857–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Arısoy YM, Özel T (2015) Prediction of machining induced microstructure in Ti–6Al–4V alloy using 3-D FE-based simulations: effects of tool micro-geometry, coating and cutting conditions. J Mater Process Technol 220:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vasudevan H, Kottur VKN, Raina AA (2018) Experimental investigation and optimization of end-milling parameters in the machining of Inconel 825 using carbide-coated tool. Proc Int Conf Intell Manuf Autom 36:401–412

    Google Scholar 

  20. Guo MX, Jiang XH, Ye Y, Ding Z, Zhang Z (2019) Investigation of redistribution mechanism of residual stress during multi-process milling of thin-walled parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103(9):1459–1466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tan L, Zhang DH, Yao CF (2017) Effect of high-speed milling parameters on surface metamorphic layer of TC17 titanium alloy. J Aeronaut Mater 37(6):75–81

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tan L (2018) Method of controlling anti-fatigue surface metamorphic layer during integration manufacturing processes. PhD Thesis, Northwest Polytechnic University, China

  23. Chen YH, Yang CL, Fan CL et al (2020) Microstructure evolution mechanism and mechanical properties of TC11-TC17 dual alloy after annealing treatment. J Alloys Compd 842:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  24. Geng GS, Xu JH, Fu YC et al (2006) Study of cutting temperature in high-speed milling of a close alpha titanium alloy. Mech Sci Technol 25(3):229–332

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liu SF, Shi JM, Yang XK (2018) High-temperature flow behaviour and constitutive equations for a TC17 titanium alloy. High Temp Mater Process 38:168–177

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tan L, Zhang DH, Yao CF, Wu D, Zhang J (2017) Evolution and empirical modeling of compressive residual stress profile after milling, polishing and shot peening for TC17 alloy. J Manuf Process 26:155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shan CW, Zhang MH, Zhang SN, Dang J (2020) Prediction of machining-induced residual stress in orthogonal cutting of Ti6Al4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107(5–6):2375–2385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xiao HQ, Liu HB (2013) Experimental data processing and experimental design method[M]. Chemical Industry Press, China

  29. Jahan MP, Alavi F (2019) A study on the surface composition and migration of materials and their effect on surface microhardness during micro-EDM of Ti-6Al-4V. J Mater Eng Perform 28(6):3517–3530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu B, Wang XY, Zhou JH et al (2010) Microstructure evolvement regularity of TC17 titanium alloy in hot deformation. Chin J Nonferrous Met 20(1):167–171

    Google Scholar 

  31. Li L, Li M (2017) Constitutive model and optimal processing parameters of TC17 alloy with a transformed microstructure via kinetic analysis and processing maps. Mater Sci Eng A 698:302–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ulutan D, Arisoy YM, Özel T, Mears L (2014) Empirical modeling of residual stress profile in machining nickel-based superalloys using the sinusoidal decay function. Procedia CIRP 13:365–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 91860206, 51875472], the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [grant number 31020200502002], the National Science and Technology Major Project [grant number 2017-VII-0001-0094], National Key Research and Development Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [grant number 2019ZDLGY02-03].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changfeng Yao.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, X., Zhang, D., Yao, C. et al. Formation mechanism of surface metamorphic layer and influence rule on milling TC17 titanium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 112, 2259–2276 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06382-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06382-8

Keywords

Navigation