Skip to main content
Log in

Geometric errors characterization of a five-axis machine tool through hybrid motion of linear-rotary joints

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Position independent geometric errors (PIGEs) of rotary axes, which are caused by imperfections during assembly of machine tools, are proved to be one of the major error sources of a five-axis machine tool. In this paper, PIGEs’ characterization method through hybrid motion of linear-rotary axes using a double ball bar (DBB) is proposed. The coordinated motions involving the motion of a linear and rotary axes are designed, namely, the XC, YC, and ZB motion pairs. The comprehensive error model of the machine tool is established using the screw theory based on the machine tool topology. The asynchronization between the synthetized velocity of the spindle tool cup relative to the workpiece tool cup during the coordinated motions has been resolved based on optimal motion trajectories. The PIGEs are identified using the particle swarm optimization method and simulated using the comprehensive machine tool model. A compensation strategy of the identified errors is proposed using the machine inverse kinematics. The effectiveness of the proposed characterization method is proved by the compensation results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ramesh R, Mannan M, Poo A (2000) Error composition in machine tools–a review part 1: geometric, cutting-force induced and fixture-dependent errors. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(9):1235–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jiang X, Cripps R (2017) Accuracy evaluation of rotary axes of five-axis machine tools with a single setup of a double ball bar. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 231(3):427–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ISO 230-1 (2012) Test code for machine tools-Part I: Geometric accuracy of machines operating under no-load or quasistatic conditions. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  4. Jiang X, Cripps R (2016) Geometric characterisation and simulation of position independent geometric errors of five-axis machine tools using a double ball bar. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83:1905–1915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rahman M, Heikkala J, Lappalainen K (2000) Modeling, measurement and error compensation of multi—axis machine tools. Part I theory. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(10):1535–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Psang D, Chian S (2008) Modeling and measurement of active parameters and workpiece home position of a multi-axis machine tool. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:338–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang J, Alintas Y (2013) Generalized kinematics of five axis serial machines with non-singular tool path generation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 75:119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen J, Lin S, Zhou X, Gu T (2016) A ballbar test for measurement and identification the comprehensive error of tilt table. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 103:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fu G, Fu J, Xu Y, Chen Z (2014) Product of exponential model for geometric error integration of multi-axis machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 71:1653–1667

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xiang S, Altintas Y (2016) Modeling and compensation of volumetric errors for five-axis machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 101:65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chapman M (2003) Limitations of laser diagonal measurements. Precis Eng 27(4):401–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwenke H, Reanke M, Hannaford J (2005) Error mapping of CMMs and machine tools by a single tracking interferometer. Ann CIRP 54(1):475–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang J, Guo J (2013) Algorithm for detecting volumetric geometric accuracy of NC machine tool by laser tracker. Chin J Mech Eng 26(1):166–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee H, Son J, Yang S (2017) Techniques for measuring and compensating for servo mismatch in machine tools using a laser tracker. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:2919–2928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Knapp W, Weikert S (1999) Testing the contouring performance in 6 degrees of freedom. Ann CIRP 48(1):433–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Du Z, Zhang S, Hong M (2010) Development of a multi-step measuring method for motion accuracy of NC machine tools based on cross grid encoder. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(1):270–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee K, Lee D, Yang S (2012) Parametric modeling and estimation of geometric errors for a rotary axis using double ball-bar. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62:741–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peng W, Xia H, Chen X, Lin Z, Wang Z, Li H (2018) Position-dependent geometric errors measurement and identification for rotary axis of multi-axis machine tools based on optimization method using double ball-bar. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99:2295–2307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ding S, Wu W, Huang X, Song A, Zhang Y (2019) Single-axis driven measurement method to identify position-dependent geometric errors of a rotary table using double ball bar. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 101:1715–1724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee K, Lee H, Yang S (2017) Interim check and practical accuracy improvement for machine tools with sequential measurements using a double ball-bar on a virtual regular tetrahedron. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:1527–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu K, Li G, He K, Tao X (2020) Identification of position-dependent geometric errors with non-integer exponents for linear axis using double ball bar. Int J Mech Sci 170:105326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsutsumi M, Saito A (2003) Identification and compensation of systematic deviations particular to 5-axis machining centers. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(8):771–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee K, Yang S (2013) Measurement and verification of position-independent geometric errors of a five-axis machine tool using a double ball-bar. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 70:45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen J, Lin S, He B (2014) Geometric error measurement and identification for rotary table of multi-axis machine tool using double ballbar. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 77:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhu S, Ding G, Qin S, Lei J, Zhuang L, Yan K (2012) Integrated geometric error modeling, identification and compensation of CNC machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 52(1):25–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ding S, Huang X, Yu C, Liu X (2016) Identification of different geometric error models and definitions for the rotary axis of five-axis machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 100:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jiang X, Cripps R (2015) A method of testing position independent geometric errors in rotary axes of a five-axis machine tool using a double ball Bar. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 101(1):65–78

    Google Scholar 

  28. Xiang S, Yang J, Zhang Y (2014) Using a double ball bar to identify position-independent geometric errors on the rotary axes of five-axis machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70:2071–2082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jiang X, Wang L, Liu C (2019) Investigation of rotary axes geometric performance of a five-axis machine tool using a double ball bar through dual axes coordinated motion. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103:3943–3952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jiang X, Wang L, Liu C (2019) Geometric accuracy evaluation during coordinated motion of rotary axes of a five-axis machine tool. Measurement 146:403–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hong C, Ibaraki S (2013) Non-contact R-test with laser displacement sensors for error calibration of five-axis machine tools. Precis Eng 37(1):159–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ibaraki S, Oyama C, Otsubo H (2011) Construction of an error map of rotary axes on a five-axis machining center by static R-test. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(3):190–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schwenke H, Knapp W, Haitjema H, Weckenmann A, Schmitt R, Delbressine F (2008) Geometric error measurement and compensation of machines-an update. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(2):660–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Renishaw plc., Renishaw QC20-W Ballbar system help manual, 2009. Available at: https://www.renishaw.com/en/qc20-w-ballbar-system-11075. Accessed 11 Nov 2020

  35. Fan K, Chen H, Kuo T (2012) Prediction of machining accuracy degradation of machine tools. Precis Eng 36:288–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to appreciate the financial support sponsored by the National Science Foundation of China (51905377, 51705362), Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (20JCQNJC00040, 18JCQNJC75600) and the Science & Technology Development Fund of Tianjin Education Commission for Higher Education (2017KJ079, 2017KJ081).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang Liu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, X., Wang, H., Yao, S. et al. Geometric errors characterization of a five-axis machine tool through hybrid motion of linear-rotary joints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 111, 3469–3479 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06302-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06302-w

Keywords

Navigation