Skip to main content
Log in

Porous collagen scaffold micro-fabrication: feature-based process planning for computer numerically controlled laser systems

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Porous collagen–based scaffolds are biostructures with demonstrated ability to induce regeneration in animal models as well as in human patients. In addition to their porous structure and physicochemical properties that have been shown to affect the regeneration process, channel-like features inside the scaffolds could provide additional beneficial effects to cells since they provide favorable orientation guidance to cells and favor the transport of required nutrients. Among other methods, ablation by ultra-short laser pulses can be used to fabricate smooth high-precision micro-scale patterns in biomaterials due to their confined damage region. This work presents a holistic approach for the precise generation of complex micron-sized features in porous collagen-based scaffolds, implemented via computer-driven 2½D layer micromachining by a focused femtosecond laser. Tool paths in G code format are generated by a computer program which enables the fabrication of geometric features (straight lines, circular and curved shapes) at specific planes. By taking into account the dependence of ablation volume on key process parameters, such as mean power, feed rate, and focal depth, complex features were fabricated on top and beneath the surface of porous scaffolds at ± 30 μm maximum dimensional tolerance of using optimized cutting parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krüger J, Kautek W (2004) Ultrashort pulse laser interaction with dielectrics and polymers. polymers and light. In: Lippert T (ed) Advances in polymer science, vol 168. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 247–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/b12683

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Brien FJ (2011) Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today 14(3):88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Loh QL, Choong C (2013) Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 19(6):485–502. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alaribe FN, Manoto SL, Motaung SCKM (2016) Scaffolds from biomaterials: advantages and limitations in bone and tissue engineering. Biologia 71(4):353–366. https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2016-0056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Novosel EC, Kleinhans C, Kluger PJ (2011) Vascularization is the key challenge in tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 63(4–5):300–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2011.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kang Y, Chang J (2018) Channels in a porous scaffold: a new player for vascularization. Generative Med 13(6):705–715. https://doi.org/10.2217/rme-2018-0022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang JHC, Jia F, Gilbert TW, Woo SLY (2005) Cell orientation determines the alignment of cell-produced collagenous matrix. J Biomech 36(1):97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00233-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu Y, Li X, Qu X, Zhu L, He J, Zhao Q, Wu W, Li D (2012) The fabrication and cell culture of three-dimensional rolled scaffolds with complex micro-architectures. Biofabrication 4. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/4/1/015004

  9. Krych AJ, Rooney GE, Chen B, Schermerhorn TC, Ameenuddin S, Gross L, Moore MJ, Currier BL, Spinner RJ, Friedman JA, Yaszemski MJ, Windebank AJ (2009) Relationship between scaffold channel diameter and number of regenerating axons in the transected rat spinal cord. Acta Biomater 5(7):2551–2559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mofrad AZ, Mashayekhan S, Bastani D (2007) Simulation of the effects of oxygen carriers and scaffold geometry on oxygen distribution and cell growth in a channeled scaffold for engineering myocardium. Math Biosci 294:160–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2017.09.003

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Koffler J, Zhu W, Qu X, Platoshyn O, Dulin JN, Brock J, Graham L, Lu P, Sakamoto J, Marsala M, Chen S, Tuszynski MH (2019) Biomimetic 3D-printed scaffolds for spinal cord injury repair. Nat Med 25:263–269. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0296-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ilina O, Bakker G, Vasaturo A, Hoffman M, Friedl P (2011) Two-photon laser-generated microtracks in 3D collagen lattices: principles of MMP-dependent and -independent collective cancer cell invasion. Phys Biol 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/8/1/015010

  13. Liu Y, Sun S, Singha S, Cho MR, Gordon RJ (2005) 3D femtosecond laser patterning of collagen for directed cell attachment. Biomater 26(22):4597–4605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Milasinovic S, Liu Y, Gasper GL, Zhao Y, Johnston JL, Gordon RJ, Hanleya L (2010) Ultrashort pulse laser ablation for depth profiling of bacterial biofilms. J Vac Sci Technol A 28(4):647–651. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.3397736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ortiz R, Aurrekoetxea-Rodríguez I, Rommel M, Quintana I, Vivanco MD, Toca-Herrera JL (2018) Laser surface microstructuring of a bio-resorbable polymer to anchor stem cells, control adipocyte morphology, and promote osteogenesis. Polymers 10(12):1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10121337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Applegate MB, Coburn J, Partlow BP, Moreau JE, Mondia JP, Marelli B, Kaplan DL, Omenetto FG (2015) 3D laser machining of biocompatible hydrogels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(39):12052–12057. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509405112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nuutinen T, Silvennoinen M, Päiväsaari K, Vahimaa P (2013) Control of cultured human cells with femtosecond laser ablated patterns on steel and plastic surfaces. Biomed Microdevices 15(2):279–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-012-9726-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Soller EC, Tzeranis DS, Miu K, So PT, Yannas IV (2012) Common features of optimal collagen scaffolds that disrupt wound contraction and enhance regeneration both in peripheral nerves and in skin. Biomater 33(19):4783–4791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stavropoulos P, Stournaras A, Salonitis K, Chryssolouris G (2010) Experimental and theoretical investigation of the ablation mechanisms during femptosecond laser machining. Int J Nanomanuf 6(1/2/3/4):55–65. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNM.2010.034772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Albagli D, Dark M, Perelman LT, von Rosenberg C, Itzkan I, Feld MS (1994) Photomechanical basis of laser ablation of biological tissue. Opt Lett 19(21). https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.19.001684

  21. Lewis LJ, Perez D (2010) Theory and simulation of laser ablation—from basic mechanisms to applications. In: Sugioka K, Meunier M, Piqué A (eds) Laser precision microfabrication, springer series in materials science 135. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 35–61

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Vogel A, Venugopalan V (2003) Mechanisms of pulsed laser ablation of biological tissues. Chem Rev 103(2):577–644. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr010379n

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu X, Du D, Mourou D (1997) Laser ablation and micromachining with ultrashort laser pulses. IEEE J Quantum Electron 33(10):1706–1716. https://doi.org/10.4028/10.1109/3.631270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu Y, Pan W (2018) Calculation of pore scattering in transparent ceramics. Solid State Phenom 281:655–660. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.281.655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Peelen JGJ, Metselaar R (1974) Light scattering by pores in polycrystalline materials: transmission properties of alumina. J Appl Phys 45:216–220. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1662961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yiannakou C (2018) Laser microfabrication of porous collagen scaffolds for biological applications. MSc thesis, University of Crete

  27. Mokhtar A, Xu X (2009) Machining precedence of 2½D interacting features in a feature-based data model. J Intell Manuf 22(2):145–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-009-0268-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gao JX, Huang XX (1996) Product and manufacturing capability modelling in an integrated CAD/process planning environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 11(1):43–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01177183

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Nassehi A, Essink W, Barclay J (2015) Evolutionary algorithms for generation and optimization of tool paths. CIRP Ann 64(1):455–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2015.04.125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Thepsonthi T, Özel T (2014) An integrated toolpath and process parameter optimization for high-performance micro-milling process of Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75:57–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6102-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu J, Zhou H, Tang X, Chen J (2011) A NURBS interpolation algorithm with continuous federate. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 59:623–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3520-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yong T, Narayanaswami R (2003) A parametric interpolator with confined chord errors, acceleration and deceleration for NC machining. Comput Aided Des 35:1249–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(03)00043-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge A. Manousaki (scanning electron microscopy facility, University of Crete) for her assistance in SEM imaging and C. Georgelou (Medical School, University of Crete) for conducting confocal microscopy.

Funding

This work was supported by the Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (HFRI) and the General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT) under grant agreement No 1635 to D.S.Tzeranis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George-Christopher Vosniakos.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kechagias, S., Moschogiannaki, F., Stratakis, E. et al. Porous collagen scaffold micro-fabrication: feature-based process planning for computer numerically controlled laser systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 111, 749–763 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06131-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06131-x

Keywords

Navigation