Skip to main content
Log in

Comprehensive experimental analysis and sustainability assessment of machining Nimonic 90 using ultrasonic-assisted turning facility

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many techniques have been developed to improve the machinability of aeronautical materials titanium and nickel-based alloys such as ultrasonic-assisted turning, laser-assisted turning, and cryogenic-assisted turning. This collaborative scientific investigation presents the steps taken to gain insight into the phenomena of machining Nimonic 90 (a nickel-based alloy) alloy using ultrasonically assisted turning. The cutting speed, feed rate, depth of cut, and frequency are taken as input parameters and average surface roughness (Ra), power consumption (P), and chip formation are considered as output parameters. The experiments are carried out with the full factorial design. The UAT (ultrasonically assisted turning) process gives a significant improvement in average surface roughness and power consumption because of the intermittent cutting action of the cutting tool. UAT process shows a 70–80% reduction in average surface roughness (Ra) and a 6–15% reduction in power consumption as compared with CT (conventional turning) process. Ultrasonically assisted turning also resulted in the thin and smoother chips as compared with CT process which helps to achieve a more superior machining effect. Finite element modeling shows that the quasi-static nature of the stress induced in the UAT process leads to lower force and ultimately lower power generation. Moreover, a sustainability assessment model is implemented to investigate the effect of UAT in terms of machining performance as well as sustainability effectiveness in a single integrated approach. The novelty of this work lies in providing an integrated concept that combines experimental analysis and sustainability assessment when using ultrasonic vibrational energy during turning of Nimonic 90.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig.11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig.16

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

UAT:

Ultrasonically assisted turning

CT:

Conventional turning

TWCR:

Tool work-piece contact ratio

FEM:

Finite element modeling

DOC:

Depth of cut (mm)

MRR:

Material removal rate (mm3/s)

m/min:

Meter per minute

mm/rev:

Millimeter per revolution

R a :

Average surface roughness (μm)

P :

Power consumption (W)

F :

Frequency (kHz)

f :

Feed rate (mm/rev)

V :

Cutting speed (m/min)

References

  1. Kumar K, Singh V, Katyal P, Sharma N (2019) EDM μ-drilling in Ti-6Al-7Nb: experimental investigation and optimization using NSGA-II. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04012-6

  2. Dhananchezian M, Rajkumar K (2020) Comparative study of cutting insert wear and roughness parameter (Ra) while turning Nimonic 90 and hastelloy C-276 by coated carbide inserts. Mater Today Proc 22:1409–1416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Venkatesan K, Devendiran S, Sachin D, Swaraj J (2019) Investigation of machinability characteristics and comparative analysis under different machining conditions for sustainable manufacturing. Measurement 107425

  4. Pervaiz S, Anwar S, Qureshi I, Ahmed N (2017) Recent advances in the machining of titanium alloys using minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) based techniques. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-019-00033-4

  5. Chetan GS, Rao PV (2019) Comparison between sustainable cryogenic techniques and nano-MQL cooling mode in turning of nickel-based alloy. J Clean Prod 231:1036–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khanna N, Airao J, Gupta MK, Song Q, Liu Z, Mia M, Maruda R, Krolczyk G (2019) Optimization of power consumption associated with surface roughness in ultrasonic assisted turning of Nimonic-90 using hybrid particle swarm-simplex method. Materials 12:3418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khanna N, Agrawal C, Gupta MK, Song Q, Singla AK (2020) Sustainability and machinability improvement of Nimonic-90 using indigenously developed green hybrid machining technology. J Clean Prod 263:121402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sharma N, Kumar K (2020) Investigation on spark erosion machining induced surface integrity of super-alloys. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18854-2_6

  9. Singh H, Kumar V, Kapoor J (2020) Optimization of WEDM process parameters in machining Nimonic 75 alloy using brass wire. Multidiscip Model Mater Struct ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/MMMS-10-2019-0178

  10. Davim JP (2014) Machining of titanium alloys. Springer

  11. Ahmed N, Mitrofanov AV, Babitsky VI, Silberschmidt V (2008) Analysis of material response to ultrasonic vibration loading in turning Inconel 718. Mater Sci Eng 424:318–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maurotto A, Muhammad R, Roy A, Babitsky VI, Silberschmidt VI (2012) Comparing machinability of Ti-15-3-3-3 and Ni-625 alloys in UAT. Procedia CIRP 1:330–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmed N, Mitrofanov AV, Babitsky VI, Silberschmidt VV (2007) Analysis of forces in ultrasonically assisted turning. J Sound Vib 308:845–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maurotto A, Roy A, Babitsky VI, Silberschmidt VV (2013) Analysis of machinability of Ti- and Ni-based alloys. Solid State Phenom 188:330–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maurotto A, Muhammad R, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2013) Enhanced ultrasonically assisted turning of a β-titanium alloy. Ultrasonics 53:1242–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Muhammad R, Maurotto A, Demiral M, Roy A (2014) Thermally enhanced ultrasonically assisted machining of Ti alloy. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 7:159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Muhammad R, Ahmed N, Ullah H, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2018) Hybrid machining process: experimental and numerical analysis of hot ultrasonically assisted turning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2087-6

  18. Bai W, Roy A, Sun R, Silberschmidt VV (2019) Enhanced machinability of SiC-reinforced metal-matrix composite with hybrid turning. J Mater Process Technol 268:149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Feyzi T, Safavi SM (2013) Improving machinability of Inconel 718 with a new hybrid machining technique. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66:1025–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kahraman MF, Öztürk S (2019) Experimental study of newly structural design grinding wheel considering response surface optimization and Monte Carlo simulation. Measurement 147:106825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maurotto A, Roy A (2014) Surface-roughness improvement in ultrasonically assisted turning. Procedia CIRP 13:49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Muhammad R, Hussain MS, Maurotto A, Siemers C, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2014) Analysis of a free-machining α+β titanium alloy using conventional and ultrasonically assisted turning. J Mater Process Technol 214:906–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin G, Zhong ZW (2006) Ultrasonic assisted turning of an aluminium-based metal matrix composite. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:1077–1081

  24. Babitsky V, Mitrofanov AV, Silberschmidt VV (2004) Ultrasonically assisted turning of aviation materials: simulations and experimental study. Ultrasonics 42:81–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Patil S, Joshi S, Tewari A, Joshi SS (2014) Modelling and simulation of effect of ultrasonic vibrations on machining of Ti6Al4V. Ultrasonics 54:694–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nath C, Rahman M (2008) Effect of machining parameters in ultrasonic vibration cutting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:965–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Amini S, Aghaei M, Lotfi M, Hakimi E (2017) Analysis of linear vibration in rotary turning of AISI 4140 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0108-5

  28. Amini S, Lotfi M, Paktinat H, Kazemiyoun M (2017) Characterization of vibratory turning in cutting zone using a pneumatic quick-stop device. Eng Sci Technol 20:403–410

    Google Scholar 

  29. Habtamu A, Ghosh S, Rao PV (2017) Experimental study on machinability of Inconel 718 using ultrasonic vibration assisted turning, proceedings of 10th International Conference on Precision, Meso, Micro and Nano Engineering (COPEN10):583–586

  30. Bhushan RK (2013) Optimization of cutting parameters for minimizing power consumption and maximizing tool life during machining of Al alloy SiC particle composites. J Clean Prod 39:242–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nur R, Noordin MY, Izman S, Kurniawan D (2014) The effect of cutting parameters on power consumption during turning nickel based alloy. Adv Mater Res 84:799–802

    Google Scholar 

  32. Carmita CN (2013) Optimization of cutting parameters for minimizing energy consumption in turning of AISI 6061 T6 using Taguchi methodology and ANOVA. J Clean Prod 1–9

  33. Aman A, Singh H, Kumar P, Singh M (2008) Optimizing power consumption for CNC turned parts using response surface methodology and Taguchi’s technique- a comparative analysis. J Mater Process Technol 200:373–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kishawy H, Hegab H, Saad E (2018) Design for sustainable manufacturing: approach, implementation, and assessment. Sustainability 10(10):3604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fahy F, Gardonio P (2007) Sound and structural vibration- radiation, transmission and response. Elsevier. ISBN 13: 978-0-12-373633-8

  36. Amin SG, Ahmed MHM, Youssef HA (1995) Computer-aided design of acoustic horns for ultrasonic machining using finite element analysis. J Mater Process Technol 55:254–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Helmi AY (2016) Machining of stainless steels and super alloys. Wiley

  38. Astashev VK, Babitsky VI (2007) Ultrasonic processes and machines: dynamics, control and applications. Springer Verlag

  39. Ozturk S (2014) Machinability of Stellite-6 coatings with ceramic inserts and tungsten carbide tools. Arab J Sci Eng 39:7375–7383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1343-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ahmed K, Dolaimy AL (2016) Effect of cutting parameters on surface roughness in turning operations Al-Qadisiyah. J Eng Sci 9

  41. Smith GT (2008) Cutting tool technology: industrial handbook. Springer

  42. Khidhir BA, Mohamed B Study of cutting speed on surface roughness and chip formation when machining nickel-based alloy. J Mech Sci Technol 24:1053–1059

  43. Davim PJ, Astakhov VP (2011) Machining of hard materials. Springer

  44. Zhou L, Li J, Li F, Xu X, Wang L, Wang G, Kong L (2017) An improved cutting power model of machine tools in milling process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:2383–2400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9929-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Xu Y, Zou P, He Y, Chen S, Tian Y, Gao X (2016) Comparative experimental research in turning of 304 austenitic stainless steel with and without ultrasonic vibration. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 1–17

  46. Khanna N, Shah P, Agrawal C, Pusavec F, Hegab H (2020) Inconel 718 machining performance evaluation using indigenously developed hybrid machining facilities: experimental investigation and sustainability assessment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106:4987–4999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-04921-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Mitrofanov AV, Babitsky VI, Silberschmidt VV (2004) Finite element analysis of ultrasonically assisted turning of Inconel 718. J Mater Process Technol 153–154:233–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hegab HA, Darras B, Kishawy HA (2018) Towards sustainability assessment of machining processes. J Clean Prod 170:694–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Narita H, Desmira N, Fujimoto H (2008) Environmental burden analysis for machining operation using LCA method. In: Manufacturing systems and technologies for the new frontier. Springer, London 65–68

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Prof. Uday S. Dixit (Indian Institute of Technology - Guwahati) for his valuable comments.

Funding

The authors are grateful to the Government of Gujarat, India to fund this collaborative project work between IITRAM, India and Loughborough University, UK. The experimental setup of ultrasonic-assisted-turning has been designed and fabricated at Advanced Manufacturing Lab (IITRAM) under this collaborative work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Navneet Khanna or Hussien Hegab.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Airao, J., Khanna, N., Roy, A. et al. Comprehensive experimental analysis and sustainability assessment of machining Nimonic 90 using ultrasonic-assisted turning facility. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109, 1447–1462 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05686-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05686-z

Keywords

Navigation