Skip to main content
Log in

Computer aided simulation and performance evaluation of additive manufacturing technology for component parts manufacturing

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Additive manufacturing technology involving the deposition of materials in successive layers provides a realistic possibility for easy and quick production of 3D objects on demand. This work involves the computer-aided simulation and performance evaluation of an additive manufacturing technology. The mechanical design, modelling and simulation of the internal accessory of a railcar were carried out with the aid of the ABAQUS® 2016 while the physical experimentations were carried out via the fused deposition modelling (FDM) method using three different 3D printing materials, namely acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) plastic, epoxy resin and polytetrafluoroethylene. An additive manufacturing system which essentially comprises the mechanical part having the stepper motor, micro-switch and extruder, and the electronics board having MELZI V2.0, a DIY shield board, USB to serial converter and Arduino micro controller was used for the product manufacturing. The analysis of the results gotten indicates that the three materials possess excellent mechanical properties which make them suitable for the service requirements. This work will assist manufacturers in their quest for innovativeness in product development as well as reduction in the manufacturing lead time and cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhou C, Chen Y, Yang Z, Khoshnevis B (2013) Digital material fabrication using mask-image-projection-based stereolithography. Rapid Prototyp J 19(3):153–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks BJ, Arif KM, Dirven S, Potgieter J (2017) Robot-assisted 3D printing of biopolymer thin shells. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(1–4):957–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Choi J-W, Kim H-C, Wicker R (2011) Multi-material stereolithography. J Mater Process Technol 211(3):318–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY, Chen C, Spence DM (2014) Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Anal Chem 86(7):3240–3253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haigh JN, Dargaville TR, Dalton PD (2017) Additive manufacturing with polypropylene microfibers. Mater Sci Eng C 77:883–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tymrak B, Kreiger M, Pearce JM (2014) Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des 58:242–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Manghnani R (2015) The impact of additive manufacturing on the automobile industry. Int J Curr Eng Technol 5(3):3407–3410

    Google Scholar 

  8. Salea A, Prathumwan R, Junpha J, Subannajui K (2017) Metal oxide semiconductor 3D printing: preparation of copper (ii) oxide by fused deposition modelling for multi-functional semiconduct-ing applications. J Mater Chem C 5(19):4614–4620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Turner BN, Gold SA (2015) A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: materials, dimensional accuracy, and surface roughness. Rapid Prototyp J 21(3):250–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vaezi M, Seitz H, Yang S (2013) A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:1721–1754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Deswal S, Narang R, Chhabra D (2019) Modeling and parametric optimization of FDM 3D printing process using hybrid techniques for enhancing dimensional preciseness. Int J Interact Des Manuf 13:1197–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Baechler C, DeVuono M, Pearce JM (2013) Distributed recycling of waste polymer into RepRap feedstock. Rapid Protyp J 19(2):118–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liverani A, Caligiana G, Frizziero L, Francia D, Donnici G, Dhaimini K (2019) Design for six Sigma (DFSS) for additive manufacturing applied to an innovative multifunctional fan. Int J Interact Des Manuf 13:309–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Laplume A, Anzalone GC, Pearce JM (2016) Open-source, self-replicating 3-D printer factory for small-business manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85:633–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Valkenaers H, Vogeler F, Ferraris E, Voet A, Kruth JP (2013) A novel approach to additive manufacturing: screw extrusion 3D-printing. In: In: proceedings of the 10th international conference on multi-material micro manufacture, research publishing, pp 235–238

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Gurrala PK, Regalla SP (2014) Part strength evolution with bonding between filaments in fused deposition modelling. Virtual Phys Prototyp 9(3):141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang J, Xie H, Weng Z, Senthil T, Wu L (2016) A novel approach to improve mechanical properties of parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling. Mater Des 105:152–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chaidas D, Kitsakis K, Kechagias J, Maropoulos S (2016) The impact of temperature changing on surface roughness of FFF process. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 161:012033 pp. 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lužanin O, Movrin D, Plančak M (2013) Experimental investigation of extrusion speed and temperature effects on arithmetic mean surface roughness in FDM built specimens. J Techn Plast 38(2):180–189

    Google Scholar 

  20. Daniyan IA, Balogun V, Mpofu K, Omigbodun FT (2020) An interactive approach towards the development of an additive manufacturing technology for railcar manufacturing. Int J Interact Des Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-020-00659-8

  21. MPDB, Material Properties Database Software Program (2019). Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks corporation, United States

  22. Bates-Green K, Howie T (2017) Materials for 3D printing by fused deposition. Edmonds Community College, pp 1–21

  23. Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B (2010) Additive manufacturing technologies. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Whyman S, Arif KM, Potgieter J (2018) Design and development of an extrusion system for 3D printing biopolymer pellets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96:3417–3428

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilesanmi Daniyan.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daniyan, I., Mpofu, K., Daniyan, L. et al. Computer aided simulation and performance evaluation of additive manufacturing technology for component parts manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107, 4517–4530 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05340-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05340-8

Keywords

Navigation