Skip to main content
Log in

Body diagonal error measurement and evaluation of a multiaxis machine tool using a multibeam laser interferometer

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To comprehensively evaluate the accuracy and performance of machine tools, in this paper, a novel measuring method for the body diagonal error of a machine tool using a multibeam laser interferometer as the measuring instrument is proposed. On this basis, a three-dimensional evaluation method for the body diagonal error of a machine tool is proposed. First, a method of measuring the body diagonal error of a machine tool by using a multibeam laser interferometer is proposed. Six errors for the body diagonal of a machine tool can be measured simultaneously, including three position deviations and three angle errors. The mathematical model of the relationship between the measured data and the volumetric error is established. Second, a new evaluation method for the body diagonal error is presented that takes the position deviation and attitude error into consideration. The advantage of this evaluation method is that it fills in the blanks in the evaluation method for the body diagonal error. The method can also be applied to the evaluation of linear axis error. Finally, the proposed measurement method is applied to a vertical three-axis machining centre, and the experimental results show that this measuring method is quite convenient and effective for measuring the body diagonal error of a machine tool. The proposed method is used to evaluate the body diagonal error from measurement data. The results show that the positioning error of the machine tool is 49.37 μm; the repeatability of the positioning error is 36.85 μm; and the angle errors are − 22.47 μm/m, − 70.9 μm/m and 29.7 μm/m. The traditional method (ISO230-6) is used to evaluate the body diagonal error from measurement data. The results show that the positioning error of the machine tool is 49.4 μm. Compared with the traditional method, the information from the proposed evaluation method is more abundant, and the evaluation method is systematic and universal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Calleja A, Bo P, González H, Bartoň M, De Lacalle LNL (2018) Highly-accurate 5-axis flank CNC machining with conical tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(6):1605–1615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Niu Y, Jiao F, Zhao B, Wang D (2017) Multiobjective optimization of processing parameters in longitudinal-torsion ultrasonic assisted milling of Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(9–12):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang W, Jiang Z, Tao W, Zhuang W (2015) A new test part to identify performance of five-axis machine tool—part I: geometrical and kinematic characteristics of S part. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79(5–8):729–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jie L, Bin M, Chaolin S, Xinjun L, Dawei L (2019) A volumetric positioning error compensation method for five-axis machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103(3)

  5. ISO 230–6: (2002) Test code for machine tools. Part 6: determination of accuracy on body and face diagonal (Diagonal displacement tests)

  6. ISO 230–2: (2006) Test code for machine tools. Part 2: determination of accuracy and repeatability of positioning numerically controlled axes

  7. Unai M, Eneko GA, Gorka K, Aitor O, Jose Y-F (2017) Traceability of on-machine tool measurement: a review. Sensors 17(7):1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jun L, Qian W (2014) A method for axis straightness error evaluation based on improved artificial bee colony algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71(5–8):1501–1509

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jywe WY, Liu CH (2000) Verification and evaluation method for volumetric and positional errors of CNC machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(13):1899–1911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ashok SD, Samuel GL (2012) Modeling, measurement, and evaluation of spindle radial errors in a miniaturized machine tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 59(5–8):445–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu H, Li B, Wang X, Tan G (2011) Characteristics of and measurement methods for geometric errors in CNC machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54(1–4):195–201

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lei WT, Hsu YY (2003) Error measurement of five-axis CNC machines with 3D probe–ball. J Mater Process Technol 139(1–3):127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Y, Yang J, Zhang K (2013) Geometric error measurement and compensation for the rotary table of five-axis machine tool with double ball bar. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65(1–4):275–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen JX, Lin SW, He BW (2014) Geometric error measurement and identification for rotary table of multi-axis machine tool using double ball bar. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 77:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee DM, Zhu Z, Lee KI, Yang SH (2011) Identification and measurement of geometric errors for a five-axis machine tool with a tilting head using a double ball-bar. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 12(2):337–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ibaraki S, Nagae K, Sato G (2014) Proposal of “open-loop” tracking interferometer for machine tool volumetric error measurement. CIRP ANN-Manuf Technol 63(1):501–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ibaraki S, Sato G, Takeuchi K (2014) ‘Open-loop’ tracking interferometer for machine tool volumetric error measurement—two-dimensional case. Precis Eng 38(3):666–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang J, Guo J, Zhang G, Guo B, Wang H (2012) The technical method of geometric error measurement for multi-axis NC machine tool by laser tracker. Meas Sci Technol 23(4):045003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen G, Yuan J, Ni J (2001) A displacement measurement approach for machine geometric error assessment. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(1):149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. He Z, Fu J, Zhang L, Yao X (2015) A new error measurement method to identify all six error parameters of a rotational axis of a machine tool. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 88:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Guangming S, Gaiyun H, Dawei Z, Yicun S, Xiaolei Z, Bohui D (2018) Effects of geometrical errors of guideways on the repeatability of positioning of linear axes of machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98:2319–2333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liang Y, Chen G, Chen W, Sun Y, Chen J (2013) Analysis of volumetric error of machine tool based on Monte Carlo method. J Comput Theor Nanos 10(5):1290–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bringmann B, Knapp W (2009) Machine tool calibration: geometric test uncertainty depends on machine tool performance. Precis Eng 33(4):524–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Castro HFF, Burdekin M (2006) Calibration system based on a laser interferometer for kinematic accuracy assessment on machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(2):89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Castro HFF (2008) Uncertainty analysis of a laser calibration system for evaluating the positioning accuracy of a numerically controlled axis of coordinate measuring machines and machine tools. Precis Eng 32(2):106–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ahn KG, Dong WC (2000) An analysis of the volumetric error uncertainty of a three-axis machine tool by beta distribution. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(15):2235–2248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shin YC, Wei Y (1992) A statistical analysis of positional errors of a multi-axis machine tool. Precis Eng 14(3):139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Brown NL (2013) Methods for performance evaluation of single axis positioning systems: point repeatability. ASPE Ann Meet 1:483–488

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51675378), a grant from the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (No. 2018ZX04033001) and Tianjin Natural Science Key Fund (Contract number: 18JCZDJC38700).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaiyun He.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, G., He, G., Zhang, D. et al. Body diagonal error measurement and evaluation of a multiaxis machine tool using a multibeam laser interferometer. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107, 4545–4559 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05275-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05275-0

Keywords

Navigation