Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of surface quality and mechanical properties of squeeze casted AA2026 aluminum alloy using response surface methodology

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aluminum–copper alloys are widely employed in automobile and aerospace industries owing to their marvelous mechanical and physical attributes. But the major hindrance in their application is that these materials are more susceptible to casting defects such as porosity, hot tears, and shrinkage occurring during solidification. The said issues have a negative impact on the mechanical properties of the casted materials and thus limit their use. Squeeze casting is a promising choice for these materials that has an ability to manufacture near-net shape parts with superior surface finish and better mechanical properties. Although, the potential of this method is tested for a variety of materials, but its capability for casting AA2026 alloy is yet to be comprehensively explored which is the primary focus of this research. Three key parameters of squeeze casting process, namely squeeze pressure, die temperature, and pouring temperature are selected for investigating their influence on surface roughness, ultimate tensile strength, and hardness using response surface methodology. Experimental results are analyzed using analysis of variance to find the control factor’s significance and adequacy of models. It has been found that squeeze pressure is the most influencing parameter for surface roughness whereas for ultimate tensile strength and hardness, pouring temperature is the major contributing factor. SEM analysis is carried out to reveal the micro-details of the fractured samples. In addition to finding optimal ranges of control variables (using contour plot analysis) for each response individually, a multi-response optimization has also been carried out using desirability approach. Furthermore, mathematical models are also developed and validated through confirmatory tests. The results of confirmatory runs depict that the proposed models have a high degree of prediction accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jorstad J, Apelian D (2009) Hypereutectic al-si alloys: practical casting considerations. Int J Met 3:13–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03355450

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sigworth G (2011) Understanding quality in aluminum castings. Int J Met 5:7–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03355504

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pratheesh K, Kanjirathinkal A, Joseph MA, Ravi M (2017) Study on the effects of squeeze pressure on mechanical properties and wear characteristics of near-eutectic Al-Si-cu-mg-Ni piston alloy with variable Cu content. Int J Met 11:831–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-017-0132-0

    Google Scholar 

  4. Greß T, Mittler T, Schmid S, Chen H, Ben Khalifa N, Volk W (2018) Thermal analysis and production of as-cast Al 7075/6060 bilayer billets. Int J Met. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-018-0282-8

  5. Vijian P, Arunachalam VP (2007) Optimization of squeeze casting process parameters using Taguchi analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33:1122–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dursun T, Soutis C (2014) Recent developments in advanced aircraft aluminium alloys. Mater Des 56:862–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Souissi N, Souissi S, Lecompte J-P, Amar MB, Bradai C, Halouani F (2015) Improvement of ductility for squeeze cast 2017 a wrought aluminum alloy using the Taguchi method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78:2069–2077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta KM (2014) Engineering materials: research, applications and advances. CRC Press

  9. Raj R, Thakur DG (2016) Qualitative and quantitative assessment of microstructure in Al-B4C metal matrix composite processed by modified stir casting technique. Arch Civ Mech Eng 16:949–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2016.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vijian P, Arunachalam VP (2006) Optimization of squeeze cast parameters of LM6 aluminium alloy for surface roughness using Taguchi method. J Mater Process Technol 180:161–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li Y, Yang H, Xing Z (2017) Numerical simulation and process optimization of squeeze casting process of an automobile control arm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88:941–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8845-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghomashchi MR, Vikhrov A (2000) Squeeze casting: an overview. J Mater Process Technol 101:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fan CH, Chen ZH, He WQ, Chen JH, Chen D (2010) Effects of the casting temperature on microstructure and mechanical properties of the squeeze-cast Al–Zn–mg–cu alloy. J Alloys Compd 504:L42–L45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Patel GCM, Mathew R, Krishna P, Parappagoudar MB (2014) Investigation of squeeze cast process parameters effects on secondary dendrite arm spacing using statistical regression and artificial neural network models. Procedia Technol 14:149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Patel GCM, Krishna P, Parappagoudar MB (2014) Optimization of squeeze cast process parameters using Taguchi and grey relational analysis. Procedia Technol 14:157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Senthil P, Amirthagadeswaran KS (2012) Optimization of squeeze casting parameters for non symmetrical AC2A aluminium alloy castings through Taguchi method. J Mech Sci Technol 26:1141–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Souissi S, Ben Amar M, Bradai C (2013) Microstructure characterization and tensile properties of direct squeeze cast and gravity die cast 2017A wrought Al alloy. Int J Mater Form 6:249–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bin S, Xing S, Ning Z, Lan LI (2013) Influence of technical parameters on strength and ductility of AlSi9Cu3 alloys in squeeze casting. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 23:977–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haider KMA, Mufti NA (2014) Mechanical and microstructural evaluation of squeeze cast Al-4% Cu alloy using a full-factorial experimental design. J Miner Met Mater Soc 66:1446–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Souissi N, Souissi S, Le Niniven C, Amar MB, Bradai C, Elhalouani F (2014) Optimization of squeeze casting parameters for 2017 a wrought al alloy using Taguchi method. Metals (Basel) 4:141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Patel M, GC PK, Parappagoudar MB (2015) Modelling of squeeze casting process using design of experiments and response surface methodology. Int J Cast Met Res 28:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gan Y, Zhang D, Zhang W, Li Y (2015) Effect of cooling rate on microstructure and mechanical properties of squeeze cast Al–Cu–Mg alloy. Int J Cast Met Res 28:50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Soundararajan R, Ramesh A, Sivasankaran S, Sathishkumar A (2015) Modeling and analysis of mechanical properties of aluminium alloy (A413) processed through squeeze casting route using artificial neural network model and statistical technique. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2015:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yaseen RS, Hussein HA, Jassim AH (n.d.) Study the effects of squeeze casting parameters on the corrosion behavior of Al-Si-4Cu alloy

  25. Souissi N, Souissi S, Le Niniven C, Amar MB, Bradai C, Halouani F (2015) An experimental design and theoretical analysis of squeeze casting parameters for 2017A aluminium alloy. Int J Mater Eng Innov 6:59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Azhagan MT, Mohan B, Rajadurai A (2015) Experimental study of squeeze casting of aluminium alloy AA6061. Appl Mech Mater Trans Tech Publ 422–426

  27. Guan RG, Zhao ZY, Li YD, Chen TJ, Xu SX, Qi PX (2016) Microstructure and properties of squeeze cast A356 alloy processed with a vibrating slope. J Mater Process Technol 229:514–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Manjunath Patel GC, Krishna P, Parappagoudar MB (2016) Squeeze casting process modeling by a conventional statistical regression analysis approach. Appl Math Model 40:6869–6888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Manjunath Patel GC, Krishna P, Parappagoudar MB (2016) Modelling and multi-objective optimisation of squeeze casting process using regression analysis and genetic algorithm. Aust J Mech Eng 14:182–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sarfraz S, Jahanzaib M, Wasim A, Hussain S, Aziz H (2017) Investigating the effects of as-casted and in situ heat-treated squeeze casting of Al-3.5% Cu alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:3547–3561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Montgomery DC (2017) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  32. Myers RH, Montgomery DC (1995) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. Wiley, Hoboken

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Maeng DY, Lee JH, Won CW, Cho SS, Chun BS (2000) The effects of processing parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of modified B390 alloy in direct squeeze casting. J Mater Process Technol 105:196–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mia M, Dhar NR (2016) Prediction of surface roughness in hard turning under high pressure coolant using artificial neural network. Measurement. 92:464–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yue TM (1997) Squeeze casting of high-strength aluminium wrought alloy AA7010. J Mater Process Technol 66:179–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Azam M, Jahanzaib M, Wasim A, Hussain S (2015) Surface roughness modeling using RSM for HSLA steel by coated carbide tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78:1031–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12:214–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1980.11980968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. El-Taweel TA (2009) Multi-response optimization of EDM with Al-Cu-Si-TiC P/M composite electrode. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44:100–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1825-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Natarajan U, Periyanan PR, Yang SH (2011) Multiple-response optimization for micro-endmilling process using response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3156-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Taxila, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

    Muhammad Asad Ali & Muhammad Jawad

  2. Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Lahore, Lahore, 54890, Pakistan

    Kashif Ishfaq

Authors
  1. Muhammad Asad Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kashif Ishfaq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Muhammad Jawad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kashif Ishfaq.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, M.A., Ishfaq, K. & Jawad, M. Evaluation of surface quality and mechanical properties of squeeze casted AA2026 aluminum alloy using response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103, 4041–4054 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03836-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03836-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation