Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Electron beam melting of gamma titanium aluminide and investigating the effect of EBM layer orientation on milling performance

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electron beam melting (EBM) is one of the growing processes of additive manufacturing technology (AMT) to fabricate 3D parts from various difficult-to-process materials such as titanium alloys. A major limitation of the EBM process is the poor surface finish of the produced parts which ultimately demands a subsequent subtractive method (secondary finishing operation) to improve the surface finish for shaping the part to be fit for-end use applications where high surface finish is commonly required. With respect to the EBM layer build direction, the fabricated part has different orientations with varying surface characteristics. Therefore, in order to perform secondary finishing operation (e.g., milling) there are different choices of EBM part orientation to select the direction of tool feed. In this research, 3D parts of titanium alloy (gamma titanium aluminide; γ-TiAl) are additively manufactured through EBM process. The effect of EBM layer/part orientation on the milling performance is further investigated in terms of surface finish improvement and edge chipping evaluation. It has been observed that the EBM layer/part orientation with respect to milling tool feed direction (TFD) plays a vital role in milling performance. Thus, a care must be taken to select the appropriate tool feed direction and layer/part orientation in order to achieve maximum surface finish with minimum edge chipping. The results revealed the vertical milling can be adopted as a secondary finishing operation to be performed on EBM produced parts of γ-TiAl and it allows to significantly improve the poor surface finish generated by EBM (Ra 31 μm). Furthermore, among the available part orientation choices, the part orientation in which the milling tool is fed across the EBM layer build direction is the best orientation resulting into high surface finish (Ra 0.12 μm) with relatively smooth edges (minimum chipping-off).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hu D (Dec. 2001) Effect of composition on grain refinement in TiAl-based alloys. Intermetallics 9(12):1037–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu X (Oct. 2006) Review of alloy and process development of TiAl alloys. Intermetallics 14(10):1114–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biamino S, Penna A, Ackelid U, Sabbadini S, Tassa O, Fino P, Pavese M, Gennaro P, Badini C (Jun. 2011) Electron beam melting of Ti–48Al–2Cr–2Nb alloy: microstructure and mechanical properties investigation. Intermetallics 19(6):776–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Klocke F, Lung D, Arft M, Priarone PC, Settineri L (2013) On high-speed turning of a third-generation gamma titanium aluminide. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harrysson OLA, Cansizoglu O, Marcellin-Little DJ, Cormier DR, West HA (2008) Direct metal fabrication of titanium implants with tailored materials and mechanical properties using electron beam melting technology. Mater Sci Eng C 28(3):366–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Priarone PC, Rizzuti S, Ruffa S, Settineri L (2013) Drilling experiments on a gamma titanium aluminide obtained via electron beam melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(1–4):483–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hernandez J, Murr LE, Gaytan SM, Martinez E, Medina F, Wicker RB (2012) Microstructures for two-phase gamma titanium Aluminide fabricated by electron beam melting. Metallogr Microstruct Anal 1(1):14–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar J, Khamba JS (2008) An experimental study on ultrasonic machining of pure titanium using designed experiments. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng 30(3):231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Todai M, Nakano T, Liu T, Yasuda HY, Hagihara K, Cho K, Ueda M, Takeyama M (2017) Effect of building direction on the microstructure and tensile properties of Ti-48Al-2Cr-2Nb alloy additively manufactured by electron beam melting. Addit Manuf 13:61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Safdar A, He HZ, Wei L, Snis A, Chavez de Paz LE (2012) Effect of process parameters settings and thickness on surface roughness of EBM produced Ti-6Al-4V. Rapid Prototyp J 18(5):401–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Koike M, Martinez K, Guo L, Chahine G, Kovacevic R, Okabe T (2011) Evaluation of titanium alloy fabricated using electron beam melting system for dental applications. J Mater Process Technol 211(8):1400–1408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pandey PM, Venkata Reddy N, Dhande SG (2003) Improvement of surface finish by staircase machining in fused deposition modeling. J Mater Process Technol 132(1–3):323–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karlsson J, Snis A, Engqvist H, Lausmaa J (2013) Characterization and comparison of materials produced by electron beam melting (EBM) of two different Ti–6Al–4V powder fractions. J Mater Process Technol 213(12):2109–2118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Galantucci LM, Lavecchia F, Percoco G (2010) Quantitative analysis of a chemical treatment to reduce roughness of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59(1):247–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Braga FJC, Marques RFC, Filho E d A, Guastaldi AC (2007) Surface modification of Ti dental implants by Nd:YVO4 laser irradiation. Appl Surf Sci 253(23):9203–9208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Campanelli SL, Casalino G, Contuzzi N, Ludovico AD (2013) Taguchi optimization of the surface finish obtained by laser ablation on selective laser molten steel parts. Procedia CIRP 12:462–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yasa E, Kruth J-P, Deckers J (2011) Manufacturing by combining selective laser melting and selective laser erosion/laser re-melting. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(1):263–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramos-Grez JA, Bourell DL (2004) Reducing surface roughness of metallic freeform-fabricated parts using non-tactile finishing methods. Int J Mater Prod Technol 21(4):297–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lamikiz A, Sánchez JA, López de Lacalle LN, Arana JL (2007) Laser polishing of parts built up by selective laser sintering. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(12–13):2040–2050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yasa E, Deckers J, Kruth J (2011) The investigation of the influence of laser re-melting on density, surface quality and microstructure of selective laser melting parts. Rapid Prototyp J 17(5):312–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hassanin H, Modica F, El-Sayed AM, Liu J, Essa K (2016) Manufacturing of Ti–6Al–4V micro-implantable parts using hybrid selective laser melting and micro-electrical discharge machining. Adv Eng Mater 18(9):1544–1549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang B, Zhu L, Liao H, Coddet C (2012) Improvement of surface properties of SLM parts by atmospheric plasma spraying coating. Appl Surf Sci 263:777–782, 2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmed N, Darwish S, Alahmari AM (2016) Laser ablation and laser-hybrid ablation processes: a review. Mater Manuf Process 31(9):1121–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahmed N, Darwish S, Alahmari AM, Salik K (2015) Laser ablation process competency to fabricate microchannels in titanium alloy. Mater Manuf Process 30(11):1290–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kumar J, Khamba JS, Mohapatra SK (2008) Investigating and modeling tool-wear rate in the ultrasonic machining of titanium. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41(11–12):1107–1117

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ahmed N et al (2017) Electron beam melting of titanium alloy and surface finish improvement through rotary ultrasonic machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:1–13

  27. Beranoagirre A, Olvera D, López de Lacalle LN (2011) Milling of gamma titanium–aluminum alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(1–4):83–88

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sharman ARC, Aspinwall DK, Dewes RC, Bowen P (2001) Workpiece surface integrity considerations when finish turning gamma titanium aluminide. Wear 249(5–6):473–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Priarone PC, Robiglio M, Settineri L, Tebaldo V (2014) Milling and turning of titanium aluminides by using minimum quantity lubrication. Procedia CIRP 24, no. Mic, 62–67

  30. Priarone PC, Rizzuti S, Settineri L, Vergnano G (2012) Effects of cutting angle, edge preparation, and nano-structured coating on milling performance of a gamma titanium aluminide. J Mater Process Technol 212(12):2619–2628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Iquebal AS, El Amri S, Shrestha S, Wang Z, Manogharan GP, Bukkapatnam S (2017) Longitudinal milling and fine abrasive finishing operations to improve surface integrity of metal AM components. Procedia Manuf 10:990–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Priarone PC, Rizzuti S, Rotella G, Settineri L (2012) Tool wear and surface quality in milling of a gamma-TiAl intermetallic. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 61(1–4):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mohammad A, Alahmari A, Mohammed M, Renganayagalu R, Moiduddin K (2017) Effect of energy input on microstructure and mechanical properties of titanium aluminide alloy fabricated by the additive manufacturing process of electron beam melting. Materials (Basel) 10(2):211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. “Gamma Titanium Aluminide.” [Online]. Available: http://www.matweb.com/search/DataSheet.aspx?MatGUID=193daaf06f3f4a5692615d96bfdc1f76. Accessed 20 Jul 2017

  35. Mitra R (2015) Structural intermetallics and intermetallic matrix composites. CRC Press

  36. Weeks CE (2005) Evaluation of a gamma titanium aluminide for hypersonic structural applications, Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology

  37. Baicheng Z, Xiaohua L, Jiaming B, Junfeng G, Pan W, Chen-nan S, Muiling N, Guojun Q, Jun W (2017) Study of selective laser melting (SLM) Inconel 718 part surface improvement by electrochemical polishing. Mater Des 116:531–537, 2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this work through research group no. RG-1438-088.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saqib Anwar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anwar, S., Ahmed, N., Abdo, B.M. et al. Electron beam melting of gamma titanium aluminide and investigating the effect of EBM layer orientation on milling performance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96, 3093–3107 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1802-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1802-7

Keywords

Navigation