Skip to main content
Log in

Flank wear assessment on discrete machining process behavior for Inconel 718

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The characteristics of Inconel 718 alloy pose major challenges during the machining process. The following study aims to improve upon the product quality and machining productivity of the material by using polycrystalline cubic boron nitride (PcBN) tools and discrete machining. The use of PcBN tools offers benefits of sustainable and economical manufacturing. The experimental setup involved high-speed milling machine, a piezo-electric actuator and data acquisition software. This manuscript unveils a new flank wear assessment model that is applicable to a discrete machining process. The mathematical analysis develops a flank wear assessment for discrete machining and cutting speed parameters for Inconel 718. The cutting conditions were as follows: cutting speed, discrete machining frequency, feed per tooth and depth of cut. The tool-work interface process behaviors were evaluated in terms of the following: cutting forces, surface hardness, surface finish, surface texture, chip morphology and flank wear. The role of discrete machining allowed for a decrease in cutting forces and an improved surface finish and surface texture. The withdrawal of the tool allowed for the oil-air mist coolant to reach the heat-affected zone, thus reducing the severity in the heat-affected zone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ulutan D, Ozel T (2011) Machining induced surface integrity in titanium and nickel alloys: a review. Int J Mach Tool Manu 51:250–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nee AY (2015) Handbook of manufacturing engineering and technology. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Sharman A, Dewes RC, Aspinwall DK (2001) Tool life when high speed ball nose end milling Inconel 718. J Mater Process Technol 118:29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Khan S, Soo S, Aspinwall D, Sage C, Harden P, Fleming M, White A, Saoubi R (2012) Tool wear/life evaluation when finish turning Inconel 718 using PCBN tooling. Procedia CIRP 1:283–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Connolley T, Reed P, Starink M (2003) Short crack initiation and growth at 600 C in notched specimens of Inconel 718. Mater Sci Eng 340:225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schornik V, Zetek M, Dana M (2015) The influence of working environment and cutting conditions on milling nickel-based super alloys with carbide tools. Procedia Eng 100:1262–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mann J, Saldana C, Moscoso W, Compton W, Chandrasekar S (2009) Effects of controlled modulation and interface tribology and deformation in machining. Tribology Letter 35:221–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yeung H, Sundaram NK, Mann JB, Compton W, Chandrasekar S (2013) Energy dissipation in modulation assisted machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 74:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mann J, Guo Y, Saldana C, Compton W, Chandrasekar S (2011) Enhancing material removal processes using modulation-assisted machining. Tribol Int 44:1225–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gaitonde VN, Karnik SR, Luis F, Paulo Davim J (2011) Performance comparison of conventional and wiper ceramic inserts in hard turning through artificial neural network modelling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52:101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gaitonde VN, Karnik SR, Luis F, Paulo Davim J (2009) Analysis of machinability during hard turning of cold work tool steel (type: AISI D2). Mater Manuf Process 24:1373–1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gaitonde VN, Karnik SR, Luis F, Paulo Davim J (2009) Machinability investigations in hard turning of AISI D2 cold work tool steel with conventional and wiper ceramic inserts. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater 27:754–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Quiza R, Luis F, Paulo Davim J (2008) Comparing statistical models and artificial neural networks on predicting the tool wear in hard machining D2 AISI steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37:641–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Figueira L, Paulo Davim J (2007) Comparative evaluation of conventional and wiper ceramic tools on cutting forces, surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning AISI D2 steel. J Eng Manuf Proc IMechE, Part B 221:625–633

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stolarski T (1999) Tribology in machine design. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  16. Usui E, Shirakashi T (1984) Analytical prediction of cutting tool wear. Wear 100:129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shaw MC (1984) Metal cutting principles. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao H, Barber G, Zou Q (2002) A study of flank wear in orthogonal cutting with internal cooling. Wear 253:957–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thomas A, El-Wahabi M, Cabrera J, Prado J (2006) High temperature deformation of Inconel 718. J Mater Process Technol 177:469–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kalpakjian S, Schmid SR (2008) Manufacturing processes for engineering materials, Fifth edn. Prentice Hall, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  21. SECO Tools (2016) Catalogue and technical guide April 2016—milling. SECO Tools

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramesh Kuppuswamy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuppuswamy, R., Zunega, J. & Naidoo, S. Flank wear assessment on discrete machining process behavior for Inconel 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93, 2097–2109 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0623-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0623-4

Keywords

Navigation