Towards circular economy implementation in manufacturing systems using a multi-method simulation approach to link design and business strategy

  • Michael Lieder
  • Farazee M. A. Asif
  • Amir Rashid
  • Aleš Mihelič
  • Simon Kotnik
Open Access
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

The recent circular economy movement has raised awareness and interest about untapped environmental and economic potential in the manufacturing industry. One of the crucial aspects in the implementation of circular or closed-loop manufacturing approach is the design of circular products. While it is obvious that three post-use strategies, i.e., reuse, remanufacturing, and recycling, are highly relevant to achieve loop closure, it is enormously challenging to choose “the right” strategy (if at all) during the early design stage and especially at the single component level. One reason is that economic and environmental impacts of adapting these strategies are not explicit as they vary depending on the chosen business model and associated supply chains. In this scenario, decision support is essential to motivate adaptation of regenerative design strategies. The main purpose of this paper is to provide reliable decision support at the intersection of multiple lifecycle design and business models in the circular economy context to identify effects on cost and CO2 emissions. The development of this work consists of a systematic method to quantify design effort for different circular design options through a multi-method simulation approach. The simulation model combines an agent-based product architecture and a discrete event closed-loop supply chain model. Feasibility of the model is tested using a case of a washing machine provided by Gorenje d.d. Firstly, design efforts for reuse, remanufacturing, and recycling are quantified. Secondly, cost and emissions of different design options are explored with different business model configurations. Finally, an optimization experiment is run to identify the most cost-effective combination of reused, remanufactured, and recycled components for a business model chosen on the basis of the explorative study results.

Keywords

End-of-life design strategy Closed-loop manufacturing system Circular economy Business model Supply chain Multi-method simulation 

Supplementary material

170_2017_610_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (517 kb)
Appendix (PDF 517 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Rashid A, Asif FMa, Krajnik P, Nicolescu CM (2013) Resource conservative manufacturing: an essential change in business and technology paradigm for sustainable manufacturing. J Clean Prod 57:166–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asif FMA, Lieder M, Rashid A (2016) Multi-method simulation based tool to evaluate economic and environmental performance of circular product systems. J Clean Prod 139:1261–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lieder M, Rashid A (2015) Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. J Clean Prod 115:36–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ou-Yang C, Lin TS (1997) Developing an integrated framework for feature-based early manufacturing cost estimation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 13(9):618–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Asiedu Y, Gu P (2010) Product life cycle cost analysis: state of the art review. Int J Prod Res 36(4):883–908CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. International Standard Organization, Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework, Geneva, Switzerland, 14040, 2006.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deng C, Wu J, Shao X (2016) Research on eco-balance with LCA and LCC for mechanical product design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(5–8):1217–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kumaran DS, Ong SK, Tan RBH, Nee AYC (2001) Environmental life cycle cost analysis of products. Environ Manag Heal 12:260–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Norris GA (2001) Integrating life cycle cost analysis and LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6(2):118–120Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zarandi MHF, Mansour S, Hosseinijou SA, Avazbeigi M (2011) A material selection methodology and expert system for sustainable product design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 57(9–12):885–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Niazi A, Dai JS, Balabani S, Seneviratne L (2006) Product cost estimation: technique classification and methodology review. J Manuf Sci Eng 128(2):563–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee SG, Lye SW, Khoo MK (2001) A multi-objective methodology for evaluating product end-of-life options and disassembly. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 18(2):148–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harjula T, Rapoza B, Knight WA, Boothroyd G (1996) Design for disassembly and the environment. CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol. 45(1):109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zussman E, Kriwet A, Seliger G (1994) Disassembly-oriented assessment methodology to support design for recycling. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol 43(1):9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Soh SL, Ong SK, and Nee AYC (2014) Design for disassembly for remanufacturing: methodology and technology, in Procedia CIRP, 15:407–412Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Go TF, Wahab DA, Hishamuddin H (2015) Multiple generation life-cycles for product sustainability: the way forward. J Clean Prod 95:16–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. Tchertchian, H. Liang, and D. Millet, The influence of multiple life cycles on the environmental impact of a product, in International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), 2009, pp. 185–196.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gu P, Sosale S (1999) Product modularization for life cycle engineering. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 15(5):387–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Takakuwa S (1997) The use of simulation in activity-based costing for flexible manufacturing systems, in Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 793–800.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kendall K, Mangin C, and Ortiz E (1998) Discrete event simulation and cost analysis for manufacturing optimization of an automotive LCM component, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., vol. 29, no. Compendex, pp. 711–720Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spedding TA, Sun GQ (1999) Application of discrete event simulation to the activity based costing of manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Econ 58(3):289–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cheng K, Srai JS (2012) Special issue on sustainable manufacturing and the key enabling technologies. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 226(10):1603–1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hatcher GD, Ijomah WL, Windmill JFC (2011) Design for remanufacture: a literature review and future research needs. J Clean Prod 19(17–18):2004–2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    He B, Tang W, Wang J, Huang S, Deng Z, Wang Y (2015) Low-carbon conceptual design based on product life cycle assessment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(5):863–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bocken NMP, Bakker C, and I. De Pauw, Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy, J. Ind. Prod. Eng., vol. 1015, no. 0, p. 20, 2016.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. Moreno, C. De los Rios, Z. Rowe, and F. Charnley, A conceptual framework for circular design, Sustain., vol. 8, no. 9, 2016.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sakai N, Tanaka G, and Shimomura Y (2003) Product life cycle design based on product life control, in Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, 2003. EcoDesign ‘03. 2003 3rd International Symposium on, pp. 102–108.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. Borshchev and A. Filippov, From system dynamics and discrete event to practical agent based modeling: reasons, techniques, tools, in 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, 25–29 July 2004, 2004, p. 45.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    F. M. Asif, C. Bianchi, A. Rashid, and C. M. Nicolescu, Performance analysis of the closed loop supply chain, J. Remanufacturing, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 4, 2012.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Siebers PO, Macal CM, Garnett J, Buxton D, Pidd M (2010) Discrete-event simulation is dead, long live agent-based simulation! J Simul 4(3):204–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vogtländer JG (2010) A practical guide to LCA for students, designers and business managers. First edit, VSSDGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    I. OptTek Systems, OptTek Systems, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.opttek.com/. [Accessed: 20-Dec-2016].
  33. 33.
    Lieder M, Asif FMA, Rashid A (2017) Towards circular economy implementation: an agent-based simulation approach for business model changes. Auton. Agent. Multi. Agent. SystGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Lieder
    • 1
  • Farazee M. A. Asif
    • 1
  • Amir Rashid
    • 1
  • Aleš Mihelič
    • 2
  • Simon Kotnik
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Production EngineeringKTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
  2. 2.R&D Competence Centre Laundry CareGorenje d.d.VelenjeSlovenia
  3. 3.Joint R&D CentreGorenje d.d.VelenjeSlovenia

Personalised recommendations