Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical simulation of the effects of bypass current on droplet transfer during AZ31B magnesium alloy DE-GMAW process based on FLUENT

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A modified Gaussian current density is put forward, which is used to simulate the dynamic process of AZ31B magnesium alloy double-electrode gas metal arc welding (DE-GMAW) droplet transfer. The process of droplet transfer in the AZ31B magnesium alloy DE-GMAW was simulated using FLUENT software. The influence of different bypass welding currents was investigated with a constant total current. The simulated results revealed that when the bypass current was 0 A, the process was the globular transfer type, the droplet transfer with a bypass current of 80 A was a projected transfer type and the droplet transfer at a bypass current of 170 A was a spray transfer type. The critical current is decreased so that spray transfer would occur at a lower current level in the DE-GMAW process. As the bypass current was increased, the shape of droplet changed from oval to round and the transition frequency of the droplet increased in a stepwise fashion. To confirm the accuracy of the simulated results, welding experiments were performed and the image processing method was used to obtain the droplet size. The simulated and experimental results were found to be in good agreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang YM, Jiang M, Lu W (2004) Double electrodes improve GMAW heat input control. Weld J 83:39–41

    Google Scholar 

  2. Li KH, Zhang YM (2008) Consumable double-electrode GMAW part I: the process. Weld J 87:11s–17s

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li KH, Zhang YM (2008) Consumable double-electrode GMAW part II: monitoring, modeling, and control. Weld J 87:44s–50s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wei HL, Li H, Yang LJ, Gao Y (2013) Consumable double electrode with a single arc GMAW. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68:1539–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li KH, Chen JS, Zhang YM (2007) Double-electrode GMAW process and control. Weld J 86:231–237

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li KH, Zhang YM (2007) Metal transfer in double-electrode gas metal arc welding. J Manuf Sci E-T ASME 129:991–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li KH, Wu CS (2009) Mechanism of metal transfer in DE-GMAW. J Mater Sci Technol 25:415–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shi Y, Xue C, Zhong H, Pan D (2010) High-speed welding technology analysis of double electrode GMAW. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University 44:50–53

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shi Y, Wen JX, Xue C, Zhang YM, Fan D (2011) Influence DE-GMAW by-pass current on weld penetration. J Lanzhou Univ Technol 37:17–20

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lu Y, Chen SJ, Shi Y, Li XR, Chen JS, Lee K, Zhang YM (2014) Double-electrode arc welding process: principle, variants, control and developments. J Manuf Process 16:93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu CS, Hu ZH, Zhong LM (2012) Prevention of humping bead with high welding speed by double-electrode gas metal arc welding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63:573–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu CS, Zhang MX, Li KH, Zhang YM (2007) Study on the process mechanism of high-speed arc welding DE-GMAW. Acta Metall Sin 43:663–667

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wu CS, Zhang MX, Li KH, Zhang YM (2007) Numerical analysis of double-electrode gas metal arc welding process. Comput Mater Sci 39:416–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu ML, Huang JK, Han RH, Shi Y (2011) Stress simulation for DE-GMAW in bonding steel with aluminum. Adv Mat Res 268-270:24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shi Y, Han RH, Huang JK, Fan D (2012) Numerical simulation of temperature field of DE-GMAW and its comparison with experimental measurements. Acta Phys Sin 61:020205

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang CY, Ma GH, Nie J, Ye J (2015) Numerical simulation of AZ31B magnesium alloy in DE-GMAW welding process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78:1259–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ding X, Li H, Yang LJ, Gao Y (2013) Numerical simulation of metal transfer process in tandem GMAW. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Boselli M, Colombo V, Ghedini E, Sanibondi P (2012) Dynamic analysis of droplet transfer in GMAW: modelling and experiments. Plasma Sources Sci T 21:1020–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen MA, Wu CS, Lian R (2004) Numerical analysis of dynamic process of metal transfer in GMAW. Acta Metall Sin 40(11):1227–1232

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ogino Y, Hirata Y (2015) Numerical simulation of metal transfer in argon gas-shielded GMAW. Welding in the World Le Soudage Dans Le Monde 59:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cui Y, Ma GH, Ma SL (2013) Weld pool image processing in double arc welding. Hot Work Technol 42:160–162

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guohong Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, S., Ma, G., Peng, X. et al. Numerical simulation of the effects of bypass current on droplet transfer during AZ31B magnesium alloy DE-GMAW process based on FLUENT. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90, 857–863 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9438-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9438-y

Keywords

Navigation