Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of shielding gas control: welded joint properties in GMAW process optimization

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One function of shielding gases used in welding processes, such as hydrogen (H2), oxygen (O2), carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen (N2), helium (He), argon (Ar) and their mixtures, is protection of the weld pool against harmful contamination that could generate defects. In addition to this primary function, shielding gases significantly affect the shape of the weld, weld geometry, seam appearance, metallurgical and mechanical properties, welding speed, metal transfer, arc stability or beam and fume emissions. The shielding gas is thus a key factor in determining weld joint properties and welding process efficiency. As welding processes have become enhanced and welding research has advanced, different combinations of shielding gas mixtures have become available under a wide variety of trademarks, each claiming to offer the best efficiency. The shielding gas flow rate in GMAW welding is usually set according to empirical experiment. The flow generally remains unchanged throughout the entire welding process and is set at maximum values of the welding parameters so that there is sufficient gas cover. This setting means, however, that unnecessarily large quantities of shielding gas may be consumed in other phases of the welding process. In view of constantly increasing prices and shortfalls in helium supply, there is a need to optimize the use of shielding gas. Consequently, an ability to closely monitor the shielding gas blend and reduce waste can provide valuable cost savings. This paper examines the effects of shielding gas mixtures and their components, presents a cross-comparison of shielding effects in fusion welding and suggests guidelines for adaptive controllability of shielding gas in advanced adaptive fusion welding. The study reviews scientific case studies and experiments from the point of view of the effect of the shielding gas on the process efficiency and process outcome. The study considers shielding gases for welding of both ferrous metals (i.e. carbon steels, stainless steels, high-strength steels) and non-ferrous metals (i.e. aluminium and its alloys, nickel and its alloys and copper and its alloys). Appropriate choice of shielding gas and use of an optimum flow rate results in better quality in terms of increased productivity, reduced gas consumption and improved weld geometry properties, microstructure and mechanical properties. Although some blends can be used effectively in many different processes, other blends appear process-dependent; they produce far poorer results when utilized in non-appropriate processes. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) and Schlieren techniques can be used for visual sensing of gas flow during fusing welding. Moreover, an adaptive alternative gas supply can improve welding performance and weld quality and reduce harmful fume emission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weber R (2003) How to save 20% on welding costs. Trailer Body Build 44(3):46–50

    Google Scholar 

  2. Filho DF, Reis RP, Ferraresi VA (2011) Evaluation of the shielding gas influence on the weldability of ferritic stainless steel. In: Arc Welding. Rijeka, In. Tech., pp 152–176

  3. Kah P, Martikainen J (2013) Influence of shielding gases in the welding of metals. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64(9):1411–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. little K, Stapon G (2005) Simplifying shielding gas selectin, how different gases gas blends affect your welding application. J Pract Weld 9(1)

  5. Kang B, Prasad YK, Kang MJ, Kim HJ, Kim IS (2009) Characteristics of alternate supply of shielding gases in aluminum GMA welding. J Mater Process Technol 209(10):4716–4721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sierwert E, Wilhelm M, Hässler M, Schein J, Hanson T, Schnick M, Füssel U (2014) Visualization of gas flows in welding arcs by the Schlieren measuring technique. Weld J 1:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schnick M, Dreher M, Zschetzsche J, Füssel U, Spille-Kohoff A (2012) Visualization and optimization of shielding gas flows in arc welding. Weld World 56(1–2):54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. American Welding Society (AWS) (2006) Best practices: gas tungsten arc welding. Weld J 80–82

  9. Lyttle KA, Praxair I (1990) ASM handbook, vol.6. ASM international

  10. Irvin B (1999) Shielding gases are the key to innovations in welding. Weld J 78(1):37–41

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lozano J, Moreda P, Llorente CL, Bilmes PD (2003) Fusion characteristics of austenitic stainless steel GMAW welds. Lat Am Res 33:27–31

    Google Scholar 

  12. EN ISO 14175 (2008) Welding consumable. Gases and gas mixtures for fusion welding and allied processes. EN ISO

  13. A. CODE (2015) Qualification standard for welding, brazing and fusion procedures; welders; brazers; and welding, brazing and fusion operators. ASME

  14. EN ISO 15614 (2004) Specification and qualification of welding procedures for metallic materials—Welding procedure test—Part 1: arc and gas welding of steels and arc welding of nickel and nickel alloys. EN ISO

  15. German Welding Society DVS (2001) MIG/MAG welding: course book. Fronius Technology Centre, Düsseldorf

    Google Scholar 

  16. Uttrachi GD (2007) GMAW shielding gas flow control systems. Weld J 86(4):22–23

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kim LS, Son JS, Kim HJ, Chin BA (2006) A study on variations of shield gas in GTA welding using finite element. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 17(1–2):249–252

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nakhla H, Yao J, Bethea M (2012) Environmental impact of using welding gas. J Technol Manag Appl Eng 28(3):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  19. Campbell SW, Galloway AM, McPherson NA (2012) Techno-economic evaluation of reducing shielding gas consumption in GMAW whilst maintaining weld quality. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63(9–12):975–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Campbell SW, Galloway AM, McPherson NA, Gillies A (2012) Evaluation of gas metal arc welding with alternating shielding gases for use on AA6082T6. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 226(6):992–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Campbell V, Galloway A, Ramsey G, Mcpherson N (2012) A potential solution to GMAW gas flow optimisation. In: 9th international conference on trends in welding research. Chicago

  22. Mvola B, Kah P, Martikainen J, Suoranta R (2015) State-of-the-art of advanced gas metal arc welding processes: dissimilar metal welding. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 229(10):1694–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bell D (2011) Avoiding mix-ups with shielding gas mixes. [Online]. Available: http://www.thefabricator.com. Accessed 23 June 2015

  24. Rhee S, Kannatey-Asibu JE (1992) Observation of metal transfer during gas metal arc welding. Weld J 71:381–386

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zielinska SEA (2008) Gas influence on the arc shape in MIG-MAG welding. Eur Phys J Appl Phys 43(1):111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Church JG, Imaizumi H (1990) Welding characteristics of new welding process, TIME process. IIW, Vols. Doc XII-1199-90

  27. Suban M, Tusek J (2001) Dependence of melting rate in MIG/MAG welding on the type of shielding gas used. J Mater Process Technol 119:185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Han KH, Han JM, Lee MW, Lee EB, Han YS (1995) Effect of shielding gas on the weldability of high efficient GMAW process. J KWS 13(1):559–569

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gouda M, Takahashi M, Ikeuchi K (2005) Microstructures of gas metal arc weld metal of 950 MPa class steel. Sci Technol Weld Join 10(3):369–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Menzel M (2003) The influence of individual components of an industrial gas mixture on the welding process and the properties of welded joints. Weld Int 17(4):262–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ebrahimnia M, Goodarzi M, Nouri M, Sheikhi M (2009) Study of the effect of shielding gas composition on the mechanical weld properties of steel ST 37–2 in gas metal arc welding. Mater Des 30(9):3891–3895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhernosekov AM, Sidorets VN, Shevchook SA (2014) Combined pulsed effect of shielding gases and welding current in consumable electrode welding. Weld Int 66(12):9–13

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gadallah R, Fahmy R, Khalifa T, Sadek A (2012) Influence of shielding gas composition on the properties of flux-cored arc welds of plain carbon steel. Int J Eng Technol Innov 2(1):01–12

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lathabai S, Stout RD (1985) Shielding gas and heat input effects on fluc cored weld metal properties. Weld J 303–313

  35. Katherasan D, Sathiya P, Raja A (2013) Shielding gas effects on flux cored arc welding of AISI 316L (N) austenitic stainless steel joints. Mater Des 45:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mukhopadhyay S, Pal TK (2006) Effect of shielding gas mixture on gas metal arc welding of HSLA steel using solid and flux-cored wires. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 3–4(29):262–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liao MT, Chen WJ (1999) A comparison of gas metal arc welding with flux-cored wires and solid wires using shielding gas. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 15(1):49–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Moravec J, Rohan P (2011) Influence of different gas shielded types on weld pool geometry for MIG welding method. In: 20th International conference on metallurgy and materials. Brno, Czech Republic

  39. Lucas W (1992) Shielding gases for arc welding. Weld Met Fabr 60:218–225

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kim W-G, Um K-K, An Y-H, Lee C-S (2009) Mechanical properties of YS 460MPa TMCP steel plate for large container ships. In: Proceedings of the nineteenth (2009) international offshore and polar engineering conference. Osaka, Japan

  41. Gyu B, Ryu KM, Sik PJ, Jeong BY, Kim TS, Lee JS (2010) Brittle crack arrestability of thick steel plates for shipbuilding. J KWJS 28(1):47–53

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kim HJ, Jang TW, Yoon DR (2008) Tandem electrogas welding of higher-strength hull structural steel. In: Proceedings of the eighteenth (2008) international offshore and polar engineering conference. Vancouver, BC, Canada

  43. Sasaki K, Motomatsu R-I, Ohkita S, Suda K, Hashiba Y, Imai S (2004) Development of two-electrode electrogas arc welding process. Nippon Steel Technical Report No 90, Tokyo, Japan

  44. Pires I, Rosado T, Costa A, Quintino L (2007) Influence of GMAW shielding gas in productivity and gaseous emissions. In: 10th international aachen wqelding conference. Aachen, Germany

  45. Migatronic (2012) IGC-Intelligent gas control. Migatronic. [Online]. Available: http://www.migatronic.com. Accessed 9 May 2016

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Energy Systems, Laboratory of Welding Technology, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland

    Belinga Mvola & Paul Kah

Authors
  1. Belinga Mvola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul Kah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Belinga Mvola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mvola, B., Kah, P. Effects of shielding gas control: welded joint properties in GMAW process optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88, 2369–2387 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8936-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8936-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation