Skip to main content
Log in

Milling vibration attenuation by eddy current damping

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Machining vibrations are harmful to workpiece surface quality and tool life, especially for thin-walled parts. A lightweight damping device is proposed by utilizing eddy current damping, and it can be easily attached onto the workpiece surface by glue. The cylindrical device is mainly composed of a magnet, an aluminum cylindrical conductor, and two springs. An induced repulsive force due to the machining vibration is generated and transmitted to the workpiece and then contributed to the vibration attenuation. Dynamic response evaluation on a cantilever beam by hammer tests demonstrates that the device is able to damp vibration mode and the effect of additive mass on the beam dynamics is investigated by roving the attaching point. Moreover, the device is applied to damp multiple modes and attenuate machining vibration of a thin-walled frame. Machining tests under different configurations of cutting parameters are carried out, and its effectiveness of wide band and adaptability to the varying machining processes are validated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guillem Q, Joaquim C (2011) Chatter in machining process: a review. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 51(5):363–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altintas Y (2012) Manufacturing automation, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adetoro OB, Sim WM, Wen PH (2010) An improved prediction of stability lobes using nonlinear thin wall dynamics. J Mater Process Technol 210(6):969–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou X, Zhang D, Luo M, Wu B (2014) Tool path dependent chatter suppression in multi-axis milling of hollow fan blades with ball-end cutter. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72(5–8):643–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dosch JJ, Inman DJ, Garcia E (1992) A self-sensing piezoelectric actuator for collocated control. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 3(1):166–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar R, Mishra BK, Jain SC (2008) Thermally induced vibration control of cylindrical shell using piezoelectric sensor and actuator. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38(5–6):551–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tasi CN, Shih LW, Lee RM (2010) Spindle vibration suppression for advanced milling process by using self-tuning feedback control. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48(1–4):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ormondroyd J (1928) Theory of the dynamic vibration absorber. Trans ASME 50:9–22

    Google Scholar 

  9. Den Hartog JP (1947) Mechanical vibrations. McGraw-Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brock JE (1946) A note on the damped vibration absorber. J Appl Mech 13(4):A284

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rashid A, Cornel MN (2008) Design and implementation of tuned viscoelastic dampers for vibration control in milling. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 48(9):1036–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang M (2011) Feasibility study of nonlinear tuned mass damper for machining chatter suppression. J Sound Vib 330(9):1917–1930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang Y, Munoa J, Altintas Y (2010) Optimization of multiple tuned mass dampers to suppress machine tool chatter. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 50(9):834–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zuo L, Nayfeh SA (2006) The two-degree-of-freedom tuned-mass damper for suppression of single-mode vibration under random and harmonic excitation. J Vib Acoust 128(1):56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mao K, Wang M, Xu Z, Chen T (2004) Simulation and characterization of particle damping in transient vibrations. J Vib Acoust 126(2):202–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kolluru K, Axinte D, Becker A (2013) A solution for minimizing vibrations in milling of thin walled casings by applying dampers to workpiece surface. Ann CIRP 62:415–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moon FC, Pao YH (1969) Vibration and dynamic instability of a beam-plate in a transverse magnetic field. J Appl Mech 36(1):92–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wiederick HH, Gauthier N, Campbell DA (1987) Magnetic braking: simple theory and experiment. Am J Phys 55:500–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. MacLatchy CS, Backman P, Bogan L (1993) A quantitative magnetic braking experiment. Am J Phys 61(12):1096–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sodano H, Bae JS, Inman DJ, Belvin WK (2005) Concept and model of eddy current damper for vibration suppression of a beam. J Sound Vib 288(4):1177–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Babak E, Mir BK, Farid G (2010) Permanent magnet configuration in design of an eddy current damper. Microsyst Technol 16(1–2):19–24

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bae JS, Hwang JH, Roh JH, Kim JH, Yi MS, Lim JH (2012) Vibration suppression of a cantilever beam using magnetically tuned-mass-damper. J Sound Vib 331(26):5669–5684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang Y, Xu D, Liu Q (2014) Vibration suppression of thin-walled workpiece machining based on the electromagnetic induction. Mater Manuf Process. doi:10.1080/10426914.2014.962042

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yiqing Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Xu, D. & Liu, Q. Milling vibration attenuation by eddy current damping. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81, 445–454 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7239-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7239-3

Keywords

Navigation