Skip to main content
Log in

Monitoring the coefficient of variation using a variable sample size control chart

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes an adaptive Shewhart control chart implementing a variable sample size strategy in order to monitor the coefficient of variation. The goals of this paper are as follows: (a) to propose an easy-to-use 3-parameter logarithmic transformation for the coefficient of variation in order to handle the variable sample size aspect; (b) to derive the formulas for computing the average run length, the standard deviation run length, and the average sample size and to evaluate the performance of the proposed chart based on these criteria; (c) to present ready-to-use tables with optimal chart parameters minimizing the out-of-control average run length as well as the out-of-control average sample size; and (d) to compare this chart with the fixed sampling rate, variable sampling interval, and synthetic control charts. An example illustrates the use of the variable sample size control chart on real data gathered from a casting process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Annadi H, Keats J, Runger G, Montgomery D (1995) An adaptive sample size CUSUM control chart. Int J Prod Res 33:1605–1616

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Calzada M, Scariano S (2013) A synthetic control Chart for the coefficient of variation. J Stat Comput Simul 83(5):853–867

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Castagliola P (2005) A new S 2-EWMA control chart for monitoring the process variance. Qual Reliab Eng Int 21(8):781–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Castagliola P, Celano G, Psarakis S (2011) Monitoring the coefficient of variation using EWMA charts. J Qual Technol 43(3):249–265

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castagliola P, Zhang Y, Costa A, Maravelakis P (2012) The variable sample size \(\bar {X}\) chart with estimated parameters. Qual Reliab Eng Int 28(7):687–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Castagliola P, Achouri A, Taleb H, Celano G, Psarakis S (2013a) Monitoring the coefficient of variation using a variable sampling interval control chart. Qual Reliab Eng Int 29(8):1135–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Castagliola P, Achouri A, Taleb H, Celano G, Psarakis S (2013b) Monitoring the coefficient of variation using control charts with run rules. Qual Technol Quant Manag 10(1):75–94

    Google Scholar 

  8. Castagliola P, Celano G, Fichera S, Nenes G (2013c) The variable sample size t control chart for monitoring short production runs. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(9):1353–1366

    Google Scholar 

  9. Costa A (1994) \(\bar {X}\) charts with variable sample size. J Qual Technol 26(3):155–163

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hong E, Kang C, Baek J, Kang H (2008) Development of CV control chart using EWMA technique. J Soc Korea Ind Syst Eng 31(4):114–120

    Google Scholar 

  11. Iglewicz B, Myers R, Howe R (1968) On the percentage points of the sample coefficient of variation. Biometrika 55(3):580–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kang C, Lee M, Seong Y, Hawkins D (2007) A control chart for the coefficient of variation. J Qual Technol 39(2):151–158

    Google Scholar 

  13. Latouche G, Ramaswami V (1999) Introduction to matrix analytic methods in stochastic modelling. ASA SIAM

  14. Neuts M (1981) Matrix-geometric solutions in stochastic models: an algorithmic approach. Dover Publications Inc

  15. Reed G, Lynn F, Meade B (2002) Use of coefficient of variation in assessing variability of quantitative assays. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9(6):1235–1239

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reynolds M (1996) Variable sampling-interval control charts with sampling at fixed times. IIE Trans 28:497–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharpe W (1994) The sharpe ratio. J Portf Manag 21(1):49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tagaras G (1998) A survey of recent developments in the design of adaptive control charts. J Qual Technol 30(3):212–223

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wu S (2011) Optimal inspection policy for three-state systems monitored by variable sample size control charts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55(5–8):689–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zimmer L, Montgomery D, Runger G (1998) Evaluation of the three-state adaptive sample size \(\bar {X}\) control chart. Int J Prod Res 36:733–743

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Castagliola.

Additional information

This work is partially funded by the EGIDE Utique PHC program 13G1109/ 28771XE and the University of Gafsa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Castagliola, P., Achouri, A., Taleb, H. et al. Monitoring the coefficient of variation using a variable sample size control chart. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80, 1561–1576 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6985-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6985-6

Keywords

Navigation