Skip to main content
Log in

Identifying the time of a step change in bivariate binomial processes

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Control charts are one of the most applicable tools in statistical process control. The time in which the control chart signals an out-of-control alarm is not the actual time in which the change has occurred. In other words, control chart detects the change with some delay. The actual time of the change taking place is referred to as change point. Change point estimation facilitates the identification of cause(s) of change and reduces the corresponding time and cost. There are many processes in which the control of two correlated attributes is necessary. Multiattribute control charts are used in such cases due to correlation between attributes. In this paper, two methods including maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and clustering are proposed for estimating change point in nonconformity ratio vector of a process with bivariate binomial distribution. Also, the performances of these methods are evaluated and compared by Monte Carlo simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Samuel TR, Pignatiello JJ, Calvin JA (1998) Identifying the time of a step change with \( \overline{X} \) control charts. Qual Eng 10(3):521–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Samuel TR, Pignatiello JJ, Calvin JA (1998) Identifying the time of a step change in a normal process variance. Qual Eng 10(3):529–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pignatiello JJ, Samuel TR (2001) Identifying the time of a step change in the process fraction nonconforming. Qual Eng 13(3):357–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jann A (2000) Multiple change point detection with genetic algorithm. Soft Comput 4(2):68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghazanfari M, Alaeddini A, Niaki STA, Aryanezhad MB (2008) A clustering approach to identify the time of a step change in Shewhart control charts. Qual Reliab Eng Int 24(7):765–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Atashgar K, Noorossana R (2011) An integrating approach to root cause analysis of a bivariate mean vector with a linear trend disturbance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52(1–4):407–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Perry MB, Pignatiello JJ (2006) Estimation of the change point of a normal process mean with a linear trend disturbance in SPC. Qual Technol Quant Manag 3(3):325–334

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Noorossana R, Shadman A (2009) Estimating the change point of a normal process mean with a monotonic change. Qual Reliab Eng Int 25(1):79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nedumaran G, Pignatiello JJ (2000) Identifying the time of a step change with χ 2 control charts. Qual Eng 13(2):153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zamba KD, Hawkins DM (2006) A multivariate change point model for statistical process control. Technometrics 48(4):539–549

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahmadzadeh F (2012) Change point detection with multivariate control charts by artificial neural network. Int J Adv Manufac Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-009-2193-6

    Google Scholar 

  12. Noorossana R, Atashgar K, Saghaei A (2011) An integrated supervised learning solution for monitoring process mean vector. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56(5–8):755–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Amiri A, Allahyari S (2012) Change point estimation methods for control charts post-signal diagnostics: a literature review. Qual Reliab Eng Int 28(7):673–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Niaki STA, Khedmati M (2012) Detecting and estimating the time of a step-change in multivariate Poisson processes. Sci Iran-Trans E 19(3):862–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Niaki STA, Khedmati M (2013) Estimating the change point of the parameter vector of multivariate Poisson processes monitored by a multiattribute T 2 control chart. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64(9–12):1625–1642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Niaki STA, Khedmati M (2014) Monotonic change point estimation of multivariate Poisson processes using a multiattribute control chart and MLE. Int J Prod Res 52(10):2954–2982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Niaki STA, Khedmati M (2014) Step change-point estimation of multivariate binomial processes. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 31(5):566–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Niaki STA, Khedmati M (2013) Identifying the change time of multivariate binomial processes for step changes and drifts. J Ind Eng Int 9(3):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Patel HI (1973) Quality control methods for multivariate binomial and Poisson distributions. Technometrics 15(1):103–112

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Marcucci M (1985) Monitoring multinomial processes. J Qual Technol 17:86–91

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lu XS, Xie M, Goh TN, Lai CD (1998) Control chart for multivariate attribute processes. Int J Prod Res 36(12):3477–3489

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Kurczynski TW (1985) Generalized distance and discrete variables. Biometrics 26(3):525–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amirhossein Amiri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amiri, A., Allahyari, S. & Sogandi, F. Identifying the time of a step change in bivariate binomial processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77, 225–233 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6418-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6418-y

Keywords

Navigation