Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-level structuralized model-based definition model based on machining features for manufacturing reuse of mechanical parts

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Model-based definition (MBD) is a new strategy of managing engineering and business processes using 3D models as complete information sources. However, due to lack of feature-based data model representation approach, current MBD models cannot be applied well in manufacturing domain. In this paper, a new multi-level structuralized MBD model based on machining features for manufacturing reuse is presented to capture the abstract information, detailed feature interaction information, and machining semantics information involved. Firstly, the machining features are recognized from an MBD model, which are taken as the machining semantics carrier. Then, the coupled machining feature cluster is introduced to construct the greater granularity’s independent structural element than machining feature, which describes the feature interactions. Finally, the MBD model is structured based on machining features and coupled machining feature clusters in a hierarchical way. In the experiments, some aircraft structural parts are utilized to verify our approach for manufacturing reuse, and the experimental results are analyzed at length to show the application effectiveness of the multi-level structuralized MBD model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hou M, Faddis TN (2006) Automatic tool path generation of a feature-based CAD/CAPP/CAM integrated system. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 19(4):350–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Quintana V, Rivest L, Pellerin R, Venne F, Kheddouci F (2010) Will model-based definition replace engineering drawings throughout the product lifecycle? A global perspective from aerospace industry. Comput Ind 61(5):497–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alemanni M, Destefanis F, Vezzetti E (2011) Model-based definition design in the product lifecycle management scenario. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52(1–4):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Quintana V, Rivest L, Pellerin R, Kheddouci F (2012) Re-engineering the engineering change management process for a drawing-less environment. Comput Ind 63(1):79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. ASME Y14.41 (2003) Digital product definition data practices

  6. Xu X, Wang L, Newman ST (2011) Computer-aided process planning—a critical review of recent developments and future trends. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 24(1):1–31

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang X, Nassehi A, Newman ST (2014) Feature recognition from CNC part programs for milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(1–4):397–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sadaiah M, Yadav DR, Mohanram PV, Radhakrishnan P (2002) A generative computer-aided process planning system for prismatic components. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20(10):709–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Joshi S, Chang TC (1988) Graph-based heuristics for recognition of machined features from a 3D solid model. Comput Aided Des 20(2):58–66

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao S, Shah JJ (1998) Automatic recognition of interacting machining features based on minimal condition subgraph. Comput Aided Des 30(9):727–739

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Rahmani K, Arezoo B (2006) Boundary analysis and geometric completion for recognition of intersecting machining features. Comput Aided Des 38(8):845–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim YS, Wang E (2002) Recognition of machining features for cast then machined parts. Comput Aided Des 34(1):71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stage R, Roberts C, Henderson M (1999) Generating resource based flexible form manufacturing features through objective driven clustering. Comput Aided Des 31(2):119–130

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Sunil VB, Pande SS (2009) Automatic recognition of machining features using artificial neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41(9–10):932–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Babic B, Nesic N, Miljkovic Z (2008) A review of automated feature recognition with rule-based pattern recognition. Comput Ind 59(4):321–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rui H, Shusheng Z, Xiaoliang B (2013) Manufacturability driven interacting machining feature recognition algorithms for 3D CAD models. J Comput-Aided Des Comput Graph 25(7):1089–1098

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mokhtar A, Xu X, Lazcanotegui I (2009) Dealing with feature interactions for prismatic parts in STEP-NC. J Intell Manuf 20(4):431–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mokhtar A, Xu X (2011) Machining precedence of 21/2D interacting features in a feature-based data model. J Intell Manuf 22(2):145–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dipper T, Xu X, Klemm P (2011) Defining, recognizing and representing feature interaction in a feature-based data model. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 27(1):101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sormaz DN, Khoshnevis B (2000) Modeling of manufacturing feature interactions for automated process planning. J Manuf Syst 19(1):28–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu Z, Wang L (2007) Sequencing of interacting prismatic machining features for process planning. Comput Ind 58(4):292–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu XW (2005) Novel surface and volumetric feature interactions for process planning. Int J Comput Appl Technol 24(4):185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Irani SA, Koo HY, Raman S (1995) Feature-based operation sequence generation in CAPP. Int J Prod Res 33(1):17–39

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Deja M, Siemiatkowski MS (2013) Feature-based generation of machining process plans for optimized parts manufacture. J Intell Manuf 24(4):831–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cordella LP, Foggia P, Sansone C, Vento M (2004) A (sub) graph isomorphism algorithm for matching large graphs. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 26(10):1367–1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tao S, Huang Z, Ma L, Guo S, Wang S (2013) Partial retrieval of CAD models based on local surface region decomposition. Comput Aided Des 45(11):1239–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bai J, Gao S, Tang W, Liu Y, Guo S (2010) Design reuse oriented partial retrieval of CAD models. Comput Aided Des 42(12):1069–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rui H, Shusheng Z, Xiaoliang B, Kaixing Z, Ximao Z (2013) Manufacturing semantics based 3D CAD model retrieval method. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 19(6):1177–1185

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yan X, Yamazaki K, Liu J (2000) Recognition of machining features and feature topologies from NC Programs. Comput Aided Des 32(10):605–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rui H, Shusheng Z, Xiaoliang B, Congcong Z, Ximao Z (2014) 3D CAD model retrieval driven rapid NC programming method for NC process reuse. J Mech Eng 50(3):191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, R., Zhang, S., Bai, X. et al. Multi-level structuralized model-based definition model based on machining features for manufacturing reuse of mechanical parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75, 1035–1048 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6183-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6183-y

Keywords

Navigation