Skip to main content
Log in

Product of exponential model for geometric error integration of multi-axis machine tools

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a product of exponential (POE) model to integrate the geometric errors of multi-axis machine tools. Firstly, three twists are established to represent the six basic error components of each axis in an original way according to the geometric definition of the errors and twists. The three twists represent the basic errors in x, y, and z directions, respectively. One error POE model is established to integrate the three twists. This error POE formula is homogeneous and can express the geometric meaning of the basic errors, which is precise enough to improve the accuracy of the geometric error model. Secondly, squareness errors are taken into account using POE method to make the POE model of geometric errors more systematic. Two methods are proposed to obtain the POE models of squareness errors according to their geometric properties: The first method bases on the geometric definition of errors to obtain the twists directly; the other method uses the adjoint matrix through coordinate system transformation. Moreover, the topological structure of the machine tools is introduced into the POE method to make the POE model more reasonable and accurate. It can organize the obtained 14 twists and eight POE models of the three-axis machine tools. According to the order of these POE models multiplications, the integrated POE model of geometric errors is established. Finally, the experiments have been conducted on an MV-5A three-axis vertical machining center to verify the model. The results show that the integrated POE model is effective and precise enough. The error field of machine tool is obtained according to the error model, which is significant for the error prediction and compensation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kiridena VSB, Ferreira PM (1994) Kinematic modeling of quasistatic errors of three-axis machining centers. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 34(1):85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Okafor AC, Ertekin YM (2000) Derivation of machine tool error models and error compensation procedure for three axes vertical machining center using rigid body kinematics. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(8):1199–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lei WT, Hsu YY (2002) Accuracy test of five-axis CNC machine tool with 3D probe–ball. Part I: design and modeling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(10):1153–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lei WT, Hsu YY (2002) Accuracy test of five-axis CNC machine tool with 3D probe-ball. Part II: errors estimation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(10):1163–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jung JH, Choi JP, Lee SJ (2006) Machining accuracy enhancement by compensating for volumetric errors of a machine tool and on-machine measurement. J Mater Process Technol 174(1–3):56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin Y, Shen Y (2003) Modelling of five-axis machine tool metrology models using the matrix summation approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21(4):243–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhu S, Ding G, Qin S, Lei J, Zhuang L, Yan K (2012) Integrated geometric error modeling, identification and compensation of CNC machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 52(1):24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fan JW, Guan JL, Wang WC, Luo Q, Zhang XL, Wang LY (2002) A universal modeling method for enhancement the volumetric accuracy of CNC machine tools. J Mater Process Technol 129(1–3):624–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bohez ELJ, Ariyajunya B, Sinlapeecheewa C, Shein TMM, Lap DT, Belforte G (2007) Systematic geometric rigid body error identification of 5-axis milling machines. Comput Aided Des 39(4):229–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen G, Liang Y, Sun Y, Chen W, Wang B (2013) Volumetric error modeling and sensitivity analysis for designing a five-axis ultra-precision machine tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(9–12):2525–2534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khan AW, Wuyi C (2010) Systematic geometric error modeling for workspace volumetric calibration of a 5-axis turbine blade grinding machine. Chin J Aeronaut 23(5):604–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cui G, Lu Y, Li J, Gao D, Yao Y (2012) Geometric error compensation software system for CNC machine tools based on NC program reconstructing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63(1–4):169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khan A, Chen W (2011) A methodology for systematic geometric error compensation in five-axis machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53(5–8):615–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lamikiz A, López de Lacalle LN, Ocerin O, Díez D, Maidagan E (2008) The Denavit and Hartenberg approach applied to evaluate the consequences in the tool tip position of geometrical errors in five-axis milling centres. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37(1–2):122–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu Y, Islam MN (2012) A new approach to thermally induced volumetric error compensation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(9–12):1071–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen IM, Yang GL, Tan CT, Yeo SH (2001) Local POE model for robot kinematic calibration. Mech Mach Theory 36(11–12):1215–1239

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Li Y, Zhu MC, Li YC, Ieee (2006) Kinematics of reconfigurable flexible-manipulator using a local product-of-exponentials formula. WCICA 2006: Sixth World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Vols 1–12, Conference Proceedings. New York: Ieee. 9022–9026

  18. He RB, Zhao YJ, Yang SN, Yang SZ (2010) Kinematic-parameter identification for serial-robot calibration based on POE formula. Ieee Trans Robot 26(3):411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tao PY, Yang G, Sun YC, Tomizuka M, Lai CY (2012) Product-of-exponential (POE) model for kinematic calibration of robots with joint compliance. In Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), 2012 IEEE/ASME International Conference on

  20. Moon YM (2000) Reconfigurable machine tool design: theory and application, in mechanical engineering. The University of Michigan

  21. Moon SK, Moon YM, Kota S, Landers RG (2001) Screw theory based metrology for design and error compensation of machine tools. In Proceedings of DETC

  22. Yu Z, Tiemin L, Xiaoqiang T (2011) Geometric error modeling of machine tools based on screw theory. Procedia Eng 24:845–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tian WJ, He BY, Huang T (2011) Universal geometric error modeling of the CNC machine tools based on the screw theory. In: Xin J, Zhu L, Wang Z (eds) Fourth international seminar on modern cutting and measurement engineering. Spie-Int Soc Optical Engineering, Bellingham

    Google Scholar 

  24. He ZY, Fu JZ, Yao XH (2010) Volumetric error modeling and analysis for CNC machine tool based on multi-body system. Key Eng Mater 426–427:441–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang G, Ouyang R, Lu B, Hocken R, Veale R, Donmez A (1988) A displacement method for machine geometry calibration. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 37(1):515–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen G, Yuan J, Ni J (2001) A displacement measurement approach for machine geometric error assessment. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(1):149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang C (2000) Laser vector measurement technique for the determination and compensation of volumetric positioning errors. Part I: basic theory. Rev Sci Instrum 71(10):3933–3937

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianzhong Fu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fu, G., Fu, J., Xu, Y. et al. Product of exponential model for geometric error integration of multi-axis machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71, 1653–1667 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5586-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5586-5

Keywords

Navigation