Skip to main content
Log in

Decoupled chip thickness calculation model for cutting force prediction in five-axis ball-end milling

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cutting force prediction plays very critical roles for machining parameters selection in milling process. Chip thickness calculation supplies the basis for cutting force prediction. However, the chip thickness calculation in five-axis ball-end milling is difficult due to complex geometrical engagements between parts and cutters. In this paper, we present a method to calculate the chip thickness in five-axis ball-end milling. The contributions of lead and tilt angles in five-axis ball-end milling on the chip thickness are studied separately in detail. We prove that the actual chip thickness can be decoupled as the sum of the ones derived from the two individual cutting conditions, i.e., lead and tilt angles. In this model, the calculation of engagement boundaries of tool–workpiece engagement is easy; thus, time consumption is low. In order to verify the proposed chip thickness model, the chip volume predicted based on the proposed chip thickness calculation model is compared with the theoretical results. The comparison results show that the desired accuracy is obtained with the proposed chip thickness calculation model. The validation cutting tests, which are in a constant material removal rate and with only ball part engaged in cutting, are carried out. The optimized lead and tilt angles are analyzed with regard to cutting forces. The geometrical as well as the kinematics meaning of the proposed method is obvious comparing with the existing models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Erdim H, Lazoglu I, Ozturk B (2006) Feedrate scheduling strategies for free-form surfaces. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(7–8):747–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arizmendi M, Fernández J, Lacalle LNL, Lamikiz A, Gil A, Sánchez JA, Campa FJ, Veiga F (2008) Model development for the prediction of surface topography generated by ball-end mills taking into account the tool parallel axis offset. Experimental validation. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 57(1):101–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. López de Lacalle LN, Lamikiz A, Sánchez JA, Salgado MA (2007) Toolpath selection based on the minimum deflection cutting forces in the programming of complex surfaces milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(2):388–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang L (2011) Process modeling and toolpath optimization for five-axis ball-end milling based on tool motion analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 57(9–12):905–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Manav C, Bank HS, Lazoglu I (2011) Intelligent toolpath selection via multi-criteria optimization in complex sculptured surface milling. J Intell Manuf 24(2):349–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. López de Lacalle LN, Rodríguez A, Lamikiz A, Celaya A, Alberdi R (2011) Five-axis machining and burnishing of complex parts for the improvement of surface roughness. Mater Manuf Process 26(8):997–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kurt M, Bagci E (2011) Feedrate optimisation/scheduling on sculptured surface machining: a comprehensive review, applications and future directions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55(9–12):1037–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Takata S (1993) Generation of a machining scenario and its applications to intelligent machining operations. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 42(1):531–534

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Spence A, Altintas Y (1994) A solid modeller based milling process simulation and planning system. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 116(1):61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. El Mounayri H, Spence A, Elbestawi M (1998) Milling process simulation: a generic solid modeller based paradigm. Trans ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 120(2):213–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Imani B, Sadeghi M, Elbestawi M (1998) An improved process simulation system for ball-end milling of sculptured surfaces. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 38(9):1089–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim G, Cho P, Chu C (2000) Cutting force prediction of sculptured surface ball-end milling using Z-map. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(2):277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fussell B, Jerard R, Hemmett J (2003) Modeling of cutting geometry and forces for 5-axis sculptured surface machining. CAD 35(4):333–346

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roth D, Ismail F, Bedi S (2003) Mechanistic modelling of the milling process using an adaptive depth buffer. CAD 35(14):1287–1303

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roth D, Gray P, Ismail F, Bedi S (2007) Mechanistic modelling of 5-axis milling using an adaptive and local depth buffer. CAD 39(4):302–312

    Google Scholar 

  16. Antoniadis A, Savakis C, Bilalis N, Balouktsis A (2003) Prediction of surface topomorphy and roughness in ball-end milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:965–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dongming G, Fei R, Yuwen S (2010) An approach to modeling cutting forces in five-axis ball-end milling of curved geometries based on tool motion analysis. Trans ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 132(4):041004.1–041004.8

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lazoglu I, Boz Y, Erdim H (2011) Five-axis milling mechanics for complex free form surfaces. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(1):117–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gonzalo O, Jauregi H, Uriarte LG, López de Lacalle LN (2008) Prediction of specific force coefficients from a FEM cutting model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43(3–4):348–356

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lamikiz A, de Lacalle LNL, Sanchez JA, Salgado MA (2004) Cutting force estimation in sculptured surface milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(14):1511–1526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fontaine M, Moufki A, Devillez A, Dudzinski D (2007) Modelling of cutting forces in ball-end milling with tool–surface inclination. J Mater Process Technol 189(1–3):73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ozturk B, Lazoglu I (2006) Machining of free-form surfaces. Part I: analytical chip load. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(7):728–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ozturk E, Budak E (2007) Modeling of 5-axis milling processes. Mach Sci Technol 11(3):287–311

    Google Scholar 

  24. Subrahmanyam KVR, San WY, Soon HG, Sheng H (2009) Cutting force prediction for ball nose milling of inclined surface. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48(1–4):23–32

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ferry W, Altintas Y (2008) Virtual five-axis flank milling of jet engine impellers-part I: mechanics of five-axis flank milling. Trans ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 130(1):011005.1–011005.11

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tsai C-L, Liao Y-S (2009) Cutting force prediction in ball-end milling with inclined feed by means of geometrical analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46(5–8):529–541

    Google Scholar 

  27. Olvera D, López de Lacalle LN, Urbikain G, Lamikiz A, Rodal P, Zamakona I (2012) Hole making using ball helical milling on titanium alloys. Mach Sci Technol 16(2):173–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tuysuz O, Altintas Y, Feng H-Y (2013) Prediction of cutting forces in three and five-axis ball-end milling with tool indentation effect. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 66:66–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ozturk E, Tunc LT, Budak E (2009) Investigation of lead and tilt angle effects in 5-axis ball-end milling processes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(14):1053–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee P, Altintas Y (1996) Prediction of ball-end milling forces from orthogonal cutting data. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 36(9):1059–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tunc LT, Budak E (2008) Extraction of 5-axis milling conditions from CAM data for process simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43(5–6):538–550

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cao Q, Xue D, Zhao J, Li Y (2010) A cutting force model considering influence of radius of curvature for sculptured surface machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54(5–8):821–835

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang H, Qin X, Ren C, Wang Q (2011) Prediction of cutting forces in helical milling process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58(9–12):849–859

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lamikiz A, López de Lacalle LN, Sanchez JA, Bravo U (2005) Calculation of the specific cutting coefficients and geometrical aspects in sculptured surface machining. Mach Sci Technol 9(3):411–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhu R, Kapoor SG, DeVor RE (2001) Mechanistic modeling of the ball end milling process for multi-axis machining of free-form surfaces. Trans ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 123(3):369–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ozturk B, Lazoglu I, Erdim H (2006) Machining of free-form surfaces. Part II: calibration and forces. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(7):736–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu XW, Cheng K, Longstaff AP, Widiyarto MH, Ford D (2004) Improved dynamic cutting force model in ball-end milling. Part I: theoretical modelling and experimental calibration. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26(5–6):457–465

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoming Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, T., Zhang, X. & Ding, H. Decoupled chip thickness calculation model for cutting force prediction in five-axis ball-end milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69, 1203–1217 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5099-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5099-2

Keywords

Navigation