Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Optimization of multi-pass turning operations using hybrid teaching learning-based approach

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a novel hybrid optimization approach based on teaching–learning based optimization (TLBO) algorithm and Taguchi’s method. The purpose of the present research is to develop a new optimization approach to solve optimization problems in the manufacturing area. This research is the first application of the TLBO to the optimization of turning operations in the literature The proposed hybrid approach is applied to two case studies for multi-pass turning operations to show its effectiveness in machining operations. The results obtained by the proposed approach for the case studies are compared with those of particle swarm optimization algorithm, hybrid genetic algorithm, scatter search algorithm, genetic algorithm and integration of simulated annealing, and Hooke–Jeeves patter search.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gilbert WW (1950) Economics of machining machining theory and practice. American Society Metals, Cleveland

    Google Scholar 

  2. Okushima K, Hitomi K (1964) A study of economic machining: an analysis of maximum profit cutting speed. Int J Prod Res 3:73–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ermer DS (1971) Optimization of the constrained machining economics problem by geometric programming. Transactions of the ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry 93:1067–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boothroyd G, Rusek P (1976) Maximum rate of profit criteria in machining. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Engineering for Industry 98:217–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shin YC, Joo YS (1992) Optimization of machining conditions with practical constraints. Int J Prod Res 30:2907–2919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Iwata K, Murotsu Y, Iwatsubo T, Oba F (1977) Optimization of cutting conditions for multi-pass operations considering probabilistic nature in machining conditions. Journal of Engineering for Industry-Transactions of ASME 99:211–217

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lambert BK, Walvekar A (1978) Optimization of multi pass machining operations. Int J Prod Res 16:259–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen MC, Tsai DM (1996) A simulated annealing approach for optimization of multi-pass turning operations. Int J Prod Res 34:2803–2825

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Ermer DS, Kromodihardo S (1981) Optimization of multi pass turning with constraints. Journal of Engineering for Industry-Transactions of the ASME 103:462–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gopalkrishan B, Khayyal FA (1991) Machining parameter selection for turning with constraints, pp. an analytical approach based on geometric programming. Int J Prod Res 29:1897–1908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta R, Batra JL, Lal GK (1995) Determination of optimal subdivision of depth of cut in multi-pass turning with constraints. Int J Prod Res 33:2555–2565

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hati SK, Rao SS (1976) Determination of optimum machining conditions deterministic probabilistic approaches. Transactions of the ASME-Journal of Engineering for Industry 98:354–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tan FP, Creese RC (1995) A generalized multi-pass machining model for machining parameter selection in turning. Int J Prod Res 33:1467–1487

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Yildiz AR (2012) A comparative study of population-based optimization algorithms for turning operations. Inf Sci 210:81–88

    Google Scholar 

  15. Holland HJ (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems an introductory analysis with application to biology control and artificial intelligence. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, USA

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rao RV, Pawar PJ (2010) Parameter optimization of a multi-pass milling process using non-traditional optimization algorithms. Appl Soft Comput 10:445–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rao RV, Pawar PJ, Shankar R (2008) Multi-objective optimization of electro-chemical machining process parameters using a particle swarm optimization algorithm. Journal of Engineering Manufacture 122:949–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yildiz AR (2009) Hybrid immune-simulated annealing algorithm for optimal design and manufacturing. Int J Mater Prod Tech 34(3):217–226

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yildiz AR (2009) A new design optimization framework based on immune algorithm and Taguchi method. Comput Ind 60(8):613–620

    Google Scholar 

  20. Durgun I, Yildiz AR (2012) Structural design optimization of vehicle components using Cuckoo search algorithm. Mater Test 54(3):185–188

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kunakote T, Bureerat S (2011) Multi-objective topology optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Eng Optim 43(5):541–557

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Yildiz AR (2012) Cuckoo search algorithm for the selection of optimal machining parameters in milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Tech. doi:10.1007/s00170-012-4013-7 (in press)

  23. Srisompom S, Bureerat S (2008) Geometrical design of plate-fin heat sinks using hybridization of MOEA and RSM. IEEE Transactions on components and packaging technologies 31:351–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yildiz AR (2012) A new hybrid differential evolution algorithm for the selection of optimal machining parameters in milling operations. Appl Soft Comput. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2011.12.016 (in press)

  25. Yildiz AR, Saitou K (2011) Topology synthesis of multi-component structural assemblies in continuum domains. Transactions of ASME, Journal of Mechanical Design 133(1):011008–011009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yildiz AR (2012) Hybrid Taguchi-differential evolution algorithm for optimization of multi-pass turning operations. Appl Soft Comput J. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2012.01.012

  27. Gokdag H, Yildiz AR (2012) Structural damage detection using modal parameters and particle swarm optimization. Mater Test 6:416–420

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vijayakumar K, Prabhaharan G, Asokan P, Saravanan R (2003) Optimization of multi-pass turning operation using ant colony system. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 43:1633–1639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen MC, Chen KY (2003) Optimization of multipass turning operations with genetic algorithms: a note. Int J Prod Res 41:3385–3388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen MC (2004) Optimizing machining economics models of turning operations using the scatter search approach. Int J Prod Res 42:2611–2625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yildiz AR (2009) A novel particle swarm optimization approach for product design and manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 40(5–6):617–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yildiz AR, Solanki KN (2012) Multi-objective optimization of vehicle crashworthiness using a new particle swarm based approach. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 59(1–4):367–376

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yildiz AR (2009) A novel hybrid immune algorithm for global optimization in design and manufacturing. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 25(2):261–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Coello CAC, Cortes NC (2004) Hybridizing a genetic algorithm with an artificial immune system for global optimization. Eng Optim 36:607–634

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Yildiz AR, Ozturk F (2006) Hybrid enhanced genetic algorithm to select optimal machining parameters in turning operation. Proc Instn Mech Engrs, Part B, Journal of Engineering Manufacture 220(12):2041–2053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yildiz AR (2013) A new hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm for robust optimal design and manufacturing. Appl Soft Comput. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.031

  37. Phadke SM (1989) Quality engineering using robust design. Prentice Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Taguchi G, Chowdhury S, Taguchi S (2000) Robust engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rao RV, Savsani VJ, Vakharia DP (2012) Teaching–learning-based optimization: an optimization method for continuous non-linear large scale problems. Inf Sci 183(1):1–15

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Rao RV, Savsani VJ, Vakharia DP (2011) Teaching-learning-based optimization: a novel method for constrained mechanical design optimization problems. Computer-Aided Design 43(3):303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Togan V (2012) Design of planar steel frames using teaching–learning based optimization. Eng Struct 34:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. RV Rao, VD Kalyankar (2011) Parameters optimization of advanced machining processes using TLBO algorithm, EPPM, Singapore, 20–21 Sep 2011.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bursa Technical University, Bursa, Turkey

    Ali R. Yildiz

Authors
  1. Ali R. Yildiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali R. Yildiz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yildiz, A.R. Optimization of multi-pass turning operations using hybrid teaching learning-based approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66, 1319–1326 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4410-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4410-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation