Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tolerance evolutionary model and algorithm in product growth design

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To guarantee the successful transformation from product functional requirement to geometry constraints and finally to dimension constraints between components in a product, an evolutionary tolerance design strategy is proposed on the basis of automation technology in product structure design. In the first part of this paper, the theory of the growth design and the process of tolerance evolutionary design are introduced. Following the evolution of product structure, product tolerance grows from its initial state, defined by accuracy requirements, to its final state, defined as dimension tolerance and geometric tolerance. In this growing process, the basic units in the product growth design, known as functional surfaces and their nominal features, are used as evolutionary carriers. With the help of these basic units, the method for the construction of a two-layer correlation network is proposed. In the second part, the tolerance assertions to assist tolerance evolutionary design are given, based on which the basic process for an evolutionary design of dimensions chain and geometric tolerance are presented. In order to optimize the allocation of the dimension tolerance, a mathematical model is developed in which a correlated sensitivity function between the cost and the tolerance is created. In the model, the design cost, the manufacturing cost, the usage cost, and the depreciation cost of the product are used as constraints to the tolerance allocation. Considering these costs, a multifactor cost function to express quality loss of the product is developed and is applied into the model. The minimum cost is used as the objective function, and the depreciation cost in the objective function is expressed by the discount rate—terminology in economics. The aim was to achieve a final and ideal balance around assembly, manufacturing, and usage through the control of product precision. In the last part, the successful usage of the proposed tolerance evolutionary strategy in the incremental growth product design is demonstrated through a design example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gu XJ, Tan JR, Qi GN (1997) Genetic model for mechanical product information. Chin Mech Eng 8(2):77–79

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huang KZ (2006) Growth design modeling. Proceedings of ASME DETC2006/99151, Philadelphia

  4. Pham DT, Yang Y (1993) A genetic algorithm based preliminary design system. J Automob Eng 207(D2):127–133. doi:10.1243/PIME_PROC_1993_207_170_02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen KZ, Feng XA (2002) Exploring a genetics-based design theory and methodology for innovating products. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Engineering Design and Automation, Maui, Hawaii, USA, pp 278–283

  6. Chen KZ, Feng XA (2003) A framework of the genetic-engineering-based design theory and methodology for product innovation. Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm, Sweden, pp 1093–1099

  7. Gero JS (2000) Computational models of innovative and creative design process. Technol Forecast Soc Change 64:183–196. doi:10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00105-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gero JS, Kazakov VA (2001) A genetic engineering extension to genetic algorithms. Evol Syst 9(1):71–92

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gero JS (1999) Extensions to evolutionary systems in design from genetic engineering and developmental biology. Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation—CEC99, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 474–479

  10. Gero JS, Kazakov VA (1998) Evolving design genes in space layout problems. Artif Intell Eng 12(3):163–176. doi:10.1016/S0954-1810(97)00022-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenman MA (1997) An exploration into evolutionary models for non-routine design. Artif Intell Eng 11:287–293. doi:10.1016/S0954-1810(96)00046-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenman MA (1996) A growth model for form generation using a hierarchical evolutionary approach. Microcomputers in Civil Engineering Spec Issue Evol Syst Des 11:161–172

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenman MA (1996) The generation of form using an evolutionary approach. In: Gero JS, Sudweeks F (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Design ’96. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 643–662

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang JY, Huang KZ, HUO ZP (2008) Function surface-based growth design theory. Chin J Mech Eng 44(4):29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Desrochers A, Clément A (1994) A dimensioning and tolerancing assistance model for CAD/CAM systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 9:352–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Desrochers A (2003) A CAD/CAM representation model applied to tolerance transfer methods. J Mech Des Trans ASME 125(1):14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Clément A, Valade C, Riviere A (1997) The TTRSs: 13 oriented constraints for dimensioning, tolerancing and inspection. Proceedings of Euroconference: Advanced Mathematical Tools in Metrology III, World Scientific, Berlin, pp 24–42

  18. Zhoul F, Kuo TC, Huang SH, Zhang HC (2002) Form feature and tolerance transfer from a 3D model to a setup planning system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19:88–96

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barraja M, Vallance R (2005) Tolerancing kinematic couplings. Precision Engineering 29:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Anderson T (1997) Surface variation and mating surface rotational error in assemblies. Master’s thesis, Brigham Young University

  21. Shang Y, Huang KZ, Zhang QP (2009) Genetic model for conceptual design of mechanical products based on functional surface. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42:211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang JY, Huang KZ, Ren HW (2008) Study on PLM-oriented product lifecycle genetic model. Int J Manuf Technol Manag 14:201–214. doi:10.1504/IJMTM.2008.017495

    Google Scholar 

  23. Huang KZ (1998) Generic structural design by assemblability for mechanical product. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on CAPE, Tokyo, pp 8-10

  24. Gero JS, Shi XG (1999) Design development based on an analogy with developmental biology. In: Gu J, Wei Z (eds) CAADRIA’99. Shanghai Scientific and Technological Literature, Shanghai, pp 253–264

    Google Scholar 

  25. Qiu SL, Kork SC, Chen CH (2002) Conceptual design using evolution strategy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20(9):683–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Frei R, Barata J, Onori M (2007) Evolvable production systems context and implications. IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics Proceedings, pp 3233–3238

  27. Chen KZ, Feng XA (2004) Virtual genes of manufacturing products and their reform for product innovative design. Proc Inst Mech Eng C Mech Eng Sci 5:557–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang ZH, Huang KZ, Lu L (2004) Tolerance evolving model and algorithm in conceptual structure design. China Mech Eng 15(8):693–697

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yang JX, Xu XS, Cao YL (2010) Functional tolerance specification design based on assembly positioning. Chin J Mech Eng 4(62):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  30. Huang KZ (2006) Generalized positioning principle and structural design automation theory (in Chinese). http://www.paper.edu.cn/downloadpaper.php?serial_number=200602-84. Accessed 30 February 2006

  31. Hu J (2001) Study on theories and method of geometric tolerance design based on variational geometric constraints network, PhD thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou

  32. Dantan JY, Anwer N, Mathieu L (2003) Integrated tolerancing process for conceptual design. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 52(1):135–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang KF, Li Y, Cheng H (2009) Modeling and analyzing approach for self adaptively matching tolerance and performance. Comput Integrated Manuf Syst 15(10):1956–1959

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yang B, Yang T, ZE XB (2006) Functional tolerance theory in incremental growth design. Chin J Mech Eng 42(10):73–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chase KW, Greenwood WH, Loosli BG (1989) Least cost tolerance allocation for mechanical assemblies with automated process selection. Manuf Rev ASME 2(4):49–59

    Google Scholar 

  36. Teran A, Pratt DB, Case KE (1996) Present worth of external quality losses for symmetric nominal is better quality characteristics. Eng Economist 42(1):39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Jinan, Jinan, 250022, China

    B. Yang, C. Q. Gao, H. T. Li & X. Z. Wang

Authors
  1. B. Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Q. Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. T. Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. X. Z. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, B., Gao, C.Q., Li, H.T. et al. Tolerance evolutionary model and algorithm in product growth design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65, 9–25 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4144-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4144-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation