Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic model for conceptual design of mechanical products based on functional surface

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computer-aided conceptual design (CACD) aims to increase efficiency and quality of design work but with little essential progress due to the gap between abstract concept and detailed structure. In order to tackle the problem concerned with conceptual design process and automation, this paper introduces the concept of functional surface as the information carrier to link together product function and structure and describes a product genetic model to represent and organize product information. Functional surface is used to formalize the product gene, a varied-length coding scheme for functional surface and product gene is proposed, and the design process model for conceptual design is established based on product gene. Finally, a prototype system for CACD is introduced to demonstrate how a product can be designed based on the proposed model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hsu W, Woon IMY (1998) Current research in the conceptual design of mechanical products. Comput Aided Des 30(5):377–389 doi:10.1016/S0010-4485(97)00101-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Sullivan B (2002) Constraint-aided conceptual design. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  3. Miles LD (1972) Techniques of value analysis and engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pahl G, Beitz W (1995) Engineering design: a systematic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Y, Feng PE, Lin ZQ (2005) A genetics-based approach for the principle conceptual design of mechanical products. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27:225–233 doi:10.1007/s00170-004-2164-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burr J (1990) A theoretical approach to mechatronics design, PhD thesis. Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby

    Google Scholar 

  7. Umeda Y, Ishii M, Yoshioka M, Shimomura Y, Tomiyama T (1996) Supporting conceptual design based on the function-behavior-state modeler. Artif Intell Eng Des Manuf 10(4):275–288

    Google Scholar 

  8. Qian L, Gero JS (1996) Function-behavior-structure paths and their role in analogy-based design. Artif Intell Eng Des Manuf 10(4):289–312 doi:10.1016/S0954-1810(96)90008-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stiny G, Gips J (1978) Algorithmic aesthetics: computer models for criticism and design in the arts. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fitzhorn P (1990) Formal graph languages of shape. Artificial Intel Eng, Design. Anal Manuf 4(3):151–163

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brown KN, McMahon CA, Williams JHS (1994) Constraint unification grammars: Specifying languages of parametric designs. In: Gero JS, Sudweeks F (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Design. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 239–256

    Google Scholar 

  12. Andersson K (1993) A vocabulary for conceptual design—part of a design grammar. IFIP WG5.2 Workshop on Formal Design Methods for CAD. Tallinn, pp 139–152

  13. Alberts LK (1993) YMIR: A domain-independent ontology for the formal representation of engineering design knowledge, PhD thesis. University of Twente, Enchede

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ball N, Mattews P, Wallace K (1998) Managing conceptual design objects: An alternative to geometry. In: Gero JS, Sudweeks F (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Design. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 67–86

    Google Scholar 

  15. Asimow M (1962) Introduction to design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dym C (1994) Engineering design: a synthesis of views. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guan X, MacCallum KJ (1996) Adopting a minimum commitment principle for computer aided geometric design system. In: Gero JS, Sudweeks F (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Design’96. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 623–639

    Google Scholar 

  18. van Elsa PA, Vergeest JSM (1998) Displacement feature modeling for conceptual design. Computer-Aided Des 30(1):19–27 doi:10.1016/S0010-4485(97)00049-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pabon J, Young R, Keirouz W (1992) Integrating parametric geometry, features and variational modeling for conceptual design. Int J Syst Autom Res App l 2:17–36 SARA.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Potter S, Culley SJ, Darlington MJ, Chawdhry PK (2003) Automatic conceptual design using experience-derived heuristics. Res Eng Des 14:131–144 doi:10.1007/s00163-003-0034-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Iivonen H, Riitahuhta A (1994) Case-based reasoning in conceptual design. In: Proc. of the Tenth CIM-Europe Annual Conference, Volume 5 of Sharing CIM Solutions. Denmark, pp. 307–314

  22. Shen Z, Smith S (2006) Optimizing the functional design and life cycle cost of mechanical systems using genetic algorithms. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27:1051–1057 doi:10.1007/s00170-004-2315-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gero JS, Shi XG (1999) Design development based on an analogy with developmental biology. In: Gu J, Wei Z (eds) CAADRIA’99. Shanghai Scientific and Technological Literature, Shanghai, pp 253–264

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gero JS (1999) Extensions to evolutionary systems in design from genetic engineering and developmental biology. In: Proc. 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation—CEC99, IEEE, Piscataway, New Jersey, pp 474–479

  25. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  26. Richard M, Edwin RH (2001) Empirical modeling of the genetic algorithms. Evol Comput 9(4):461–493 doi:10.1162/10636560152642878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gu XJ, Tan JR, Qi GN (1997) Genetic model for mechanical product information. Chin Mech Eng 8(2):77–79

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chen KZ, Feng XA (2004) Virtual genes of manufacturing products and their reform for product innovative design. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C. J Mech Eng Sci 218(5):557–574 doi:10.1243/095440704774061219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Parmee IC, Denham MJ (1994) The integration of adaptive search techniques with current engineering design practice. Proc. of Adaptive Computing in Engineering Design and Control’94, Plymouth, 1–13

  30. Pham DT, Yang Y (1993) A genetic algorithm based preliminary design system. J Automobile Engineers. 207(D2):127–133 doi:10.1243/PIME_PROC_1993_207_170_02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rosenman MA (1997) An exploration into evolutionary models for non-routine design. Artif Intell Eng 11:287–293 doi:10.1016/S0954-1810(96)00046-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rosenman MA (1996) A growth model for form generation using a hierarchical evolutionary approach, Microcomputers in Civil engineering. Spec Issue Evol Syst Des 11:161–172

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rosenman MA (1996) The generation of form using an evolutionary approach. In: Gero JS, Sudweeks F (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Design’96. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 643–662

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gero JS (2000) Computational models of innovative and creative design process. Technol Forecast Soc Change 64:183–196 doi:10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00105-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gero JS, Kazakov VA (1998) Evolving design genes in space layout planning problems. Artif Intell Eng 12(3):163–176 doi:10.1016/S0954-1810(97)00022-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Huang KZ (1998) Technical report: functional surface decomposition and reconstitution principle and its application. China Hi-Tech Development Program (863). Shandong University of Technology, Jinan

  37. Huang KZ, Wang YD, Yang ZH, Zhang Y, Wang WG, Meng QB, Sun X (2007) Synchronized tolerancing in growth design. Proc. IMechE Part B. J. Eng Manuf 221:1451–1465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Huang KZ (2006) Growth Design Modeling. Proc. of ASME DETC2006/99151, Philadelphia

  39. Yang JY, Huang KZ, Ren HW (2008) Study on PLM-Oriented Product Lifecycle Genetic Model. Int J Manuf Technol Manage 14:201–214 IJMTM doi:10.1504/IJMTM.2008.017495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kooler R (1990) Mechanical design methodology. Translated by Dang ZL, Tian ST, Tang J et al. Science, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  41. Huang CY (2000) Mechanical innovative design. Higher Education, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  42. Huang KZ (2006) Generalized Positioning Principle and Structural Design Automation Theory (in Chinese). http://www.paper.edu.cn/downloadpaper.php?serial_ number=200602-84. Accessed 30 Feb 2006

  43. Huang KZ, Huo ZP, Xu ZG, Li JS, Ai X (1998) Study on schematic design of mechanical product based on decomposition and reconstitution of design requirements. In: Ni J et al (ed) Manufacturing Science and Technology for New Century. Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press, Wuhan, pp 360–364

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Z. Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shang, Y., Huang, K.Z. & Zhang, Q.P. Genetic model for conceptual design of mechanical products based on functional surface. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42, 211–221 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1607-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1607-1

Keywords

Navigation