Skip to main content
Log in

An empirical study to evaluate machine tool production readiness and performance

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purchasing the correct machine tool can have strategic implications for manufacturers, because incorrect selection will eventually lead to quality and productivity losses. Prior research has concentrated on developing an analytical decision support system to select and compare machine tools based on machine functionality—not capability. Machine tool selection decision analyses concentrate on machine specifications and characteristics, which disregard the actual machine accuracy and dynamic performance. In this paper, the need to include machine accuracy and performance in terms of cycle time, tool wear, and surface finish is described with a case study of manufacturing a typical aerospace component using three different production methodologies on three computer numeric controller milling machines. Even though the three selected machine tools have similar technical specifications, which are adequate to manufacture the sample aerospace part, the machine accuracy and dynamic machining performance of the machines is significantly different. We conclude that it is necessary to include machine tool performance and production readiness attributes and not solely rely on the specifications when considering machine tool selection and purchasing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ervin, J Patrick, Look at Machine Capability Before Buying, Manufacturing Engineering, Sep 2004

  2. Zeki Ayag, Ozdemir RG (2006) A fuzzy AHP approach to evaluating machine tool alternatives. J Intell Manuf 17(2):179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Moon C, Lee M, Seo Y, Lee Y (2002) Integrated machine tool selection and operation sequencing with capacity and precedence constraints using genetic algorithm. Comput Ind Eng 43(3):605–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Haddock J, Hartshorn T (1989) A decision support system for specific machine selection. Comput Ind Eng 16(2):277–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Peng Q (2004) The selection of tools and machines on web-based manufacturing environments. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 44(2–3):317–326

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deshpande A, Snyder J, Scherrer D, Feature level energy assessments for discrete part manufacturing, 39th Annual SME North American Manufacturing Research Conference (NAMRC), June 13–17, 2011—Oregon State University—Corvallis, OR

  7. Atmani A, Lashkari R (1998) A model of machine-tool selection and operation allocation in flexible manufacturing system. Int J Prod Res 36(5):1339–1349

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Çimren E, Çatay B, Budak E (2007) Development of a machine tool selection system using AHP. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35:363–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mustafa Y (2004) AHP as a strategic decision-making tool to justify machine tool selection. J Mater Process Technol 146(3):365–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Semih O, Kara S, Efendigil T (2008) A hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach to machine tool selection. J Intell Manuf 19(4):443–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. MTConnect Institute, MTConnect® Standard: Part 1—overview and protocol, version 1.1.0—final. April 2010

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Deshpande.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deshpande, A. An empirical study to evaluate machine tool production readiness and performance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64, 1285–1296 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4086-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4086-3

Keywords

Navigation