Skip to main content
Log in

Supply chain model with variable lead time under credit policy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The success of the Japanese in the employment of just-in-time (JIT) production has received a great deal of attention in the past two decades. The underlying goal of JIT is to eliminate wastes, which can be achieved through various efforts such as shortening lead time and improving quality. The objective of this study is to extend the model of Huang et al. (Eur J Oper Res 202:473–478, 2010) by allowing deterministic variable lead time and quality improvement investment on an integrated inventory model. That is, this article develops an integrated inventory model which jointly determines the optimal order quantity, process quality, lead time, and the frequency of deliveries simultaneously. Furthermore, a solution procedure is suggested for solving the proposed model, and numerical examples are given to illustrate the benefit of coordination between vendor and buyer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banerjee A (1986) A joint economic-lot-size model for purchaser and vendor. Dec Sci 17:292–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Banerjee A (2005) Concurrent pricing and lot sizing for make-to-order contract production. Int J Prod Econ 93–94:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ben-Daya M, Raouf A (1994) Inventory models involving lead time as decision variable. J Oper Res Soc 45:579–582

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chung KJ, Huang CK (2009) An ordering policy with allowable shortage and permissible delay in payments. Appl Math Model 33:2518–2525

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. David I, Eben-Chaime M (2003) How far should JIT vendor–buyer relationships go? Int J Prod Econ 81–82:361–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goyal SK, Nebebe F (2000) Determination of economic production–shipment policy for a single-vendor single-buyer system. Eur J Oper Res 121:175–178

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hariga MA, Al-Fawzan MA (2005) Joint determination of target value and production run for a process with multiple markets. Int J Prod Econ 96:201–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang YF (2006) An inventory model under two levels of trade credit and limited storage space derived without derivatives. Appl Math Model 30:418–436

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang CK, Chung KJ, Tsai DM, Wu JC (2010a) An integrated vendor–buyer inventory model with order-processing cost reduction and permissible delay in payments. Eur J Oper Res 202:473–478

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang CK (2010b) An integrated inventory model under conditions of order processing cost reduction and permissible delay in payments. Appl Math Model 34:1352–1359

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Jaggi CK, Goyal SK, Goel SK (2008) Retailer’s optimal replenishment decisions with credit-linked demand under permissible delay in payments. Eur J Oper Res 190:130–135

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kelle P, Al-Khateeb F, Miller PA (2003) Partnership and negotiation support by joint optimal ordering policies for JIT. Int J Prod Econ 81–82:431–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khan LR, Sarker RA (2002) An optimal batch size for a JIT manufacturing system. Comput Ind Eng 42:127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liao CJ, Shyu CH (1991) An analytical determination of lead time with normal demand. Int J Oper Prod Manage 11:72–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ouyang LY, Chang HC (2000) Impact of investing in quality improvement on (Q,r,L) model involving the imperfect production process. Prod Plan Control 11:598–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ouyang LY, Chen CK, Chang HC (2002) Quality improvement, setup cost and lead-time reductions in lot size reorder point models with an imperfect production process. Comput Oper Res 29:1701–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ouyang LY, Teng JT, Goyal SK, Yang CT (2009) An economic order quantity model for deteriorating items with partially permissible delay in payments linked to order quantity. Eur J Oper Res 194:418–431

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Pan JCH, Yang JS (2002) A study of an integrated inventory with controllable lead time. Int J Prod Res 40:1263–1273

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Porteus EL (1986) Optimal lot sizing, process quality improvement and setup cost reduction. Oper Res 34:137–144

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Sana SS, Chaudhuri KS (2008) A deterministic EOQ model with delays in payments and price-discount offers. Eur J Oper Res 184:509–533

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Teng JT, Chang CT (2009) Optimal manufacturer’s replenishment policies in the EPQ model under two levels of trade credit policy. Eur J Oper Res 195:358–363

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsao YC, Sheen GJ (2008) Dynamic pricing, promotion and replenishment policies for a deteriorating item under permissible delay in payments. Comput Oper Res 35:3562–3580

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Woo YY, Hsu SL, Wu S (2001) An integrated inventory model for a single vendor and multiple buyers with ordering cost reduction. Int J Prod Econ 73:203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu MY, Wee HM, Rau H (2003) Integrated inventory model for deteriorating items under a multi-echelon supply chain environment. Int J Prod Econ 86:155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Rameswari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uthayakumar, R., Rameswari, M. Supply chain model with variable lead time under credit policy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64, 389–397 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-3993-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-3993-7

Keywords

Navigation