Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A hybrid algorithm to optimize cutting parameter for machining GFRP composite using alumina cutting tools

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, two different evolutionary algorithm-based neural network models were developed to optimise the unit production cost. The hybrid neural network models are, namely, genetic algorithm-based neural network (GA-NN) model and particle swarm optimization-based neural network (PSO-NN) model. These hybrid neural network models were used to find the optimal cutting conditions of Ti[C,N] mixed alumina-based ceramic cutting tool (CC650) and SiC whisker-reinforced alumina-based ceramic cutting tool (CC670) on machining glass fibre-reinforced plastic (GFRP) composite. The objective considered was the minimization of unit production cost subjected to various machine constraints. An orthogonal design and analysis of variance was employed to determine the effective cutting parameters on the tool life. Neural network helps obtain a fairly accurate prediction, even when enough and adequate information is not available. The GA-NN and PSO-NN models were compared for their performance. Optimal cutting conditions obtained with the PSO-NN model are the best possible compromise compared with the GA-NN model during machining GFRP composite using alumina cutting tool. This model also proved that neural networks are capable of reducing uncertainties related to the optimization and estimation of unit production cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benardos PG, Vosniakos G-C (2007) Optimizing feedforward artificial neural network architecture. Eng Appl Artif Intell 20:365–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Correa M, Bielza C, Pamies-Teixeira J (2009) Comparison of Bayesian networks and artificial neural networks for quality detection in a machining process. Expert Syst Appl 36:7270–7279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cus F, Zuperl U (2006) Approach to optimization of cutting conditions by using artificial neural networks. J Mater Process Technol 173:281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gen M, Cheng R (1997) Genetic algorithm and engineering design. Wiley Interscience, Singapore, pp 1–41

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldberg DE (2001) Genetic algorithm in search, optimization and machine learning. Pearson Education, Singapore, pp 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jamshidi SF, Amiri M, Karimi N (2010) Nonlinear continuous multi-response problems: a novel two-phase hybrid genetic based metaheuristic. Applied Soft Computing 10:1274–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalyanmoy D (1996) Optimization for engineering design: algorithms and example. Prentice Hall, New Delhi, pp 290–318

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kao Yi-Tung, Zahara E (2008) A hybrid genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for multimodal functions. Appl Soft Comput 8:849–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuo H-C, Chang J-R, Liu C-H (2006) Particle swarm optimization for global optimization problems. J Mar Sci Technol 14(3):170–181

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee ES (2001) Precision machining of glass fibre reinforced plastics with respect to tool characteristics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17:791–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li L, He N, Wang M, Wang ZG (2002) High speed cutting of Inconel 718 with coated carbide and ceramic inserts. J Mater Process Technol 129:127–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lima JG, Avila RF, Abrao AM, Faustino M, Paulo Davim J (2005) Hard turning: AISI 4340 high strength low alloy steel and AISI D2 cold work tool steel. J Mater Process Technol 169:388–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mukherjee I, Ray PK (2006) A review of optimization techniques in metal cutting processes. Comput Ind Eng 50:15–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Muthukrishnan N, Paulo Davim J (2009) Optimization of machining parameters of Al/SiC-MMC with ANOVA and ANN analysis. J Mater Process Technol 209:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Panda S, Padhy NP (2008) Comparison of particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm for FACTS-based controller design. Appl Soft Comput 8:1418–1427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rao RV, Pawar PJ, Shankar R (2008) Multi-objective optimization of electro-chemical machining process parameters using a particle swarm optimization algorithm. J Eng Manuf 122:949–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sahin Y (2009) Comparison of tool life between ceramic and cubic boron nitride (CBN) cutting tools when machining hardened steels. J Mater Process Technol 209:3478–3489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Saravanan R, Asokan P, Vijayakumar K (2003) Machining parameters optimizations for turning cylindrical stock into a continuous finished profile using genetic algorithm (GA) and simulated annealing (SA). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sathiya P, Aravindan S, Narool Haq A, Paneerselvam K (2009) Optimization of friction welding parameters using evolutionary computational techniques. J Mater Process Technol 209(5):2576–2584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Senthil Kumar A, Adam Khan M, Thiraviam R, Sornakumar T (2006) Machining parameters optimization for alumina based ceramic cutting tools using genetic algorithm. Mach Sci Technol 10:471–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Senthil Kumar A, Raja Durai A, Sornakumar T (2003) Machinability of hardened steel using alumina based ceramic cutting tools. Int J Refractory Met Hard Mater 21:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Senthil Kumar A, Raja Durai A, Sornakumar T (2006) Wear behaviour of alumina based ceramic cutting tools on machining steels. Tribol Int 39:191–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Srinivasu DS, Ramesh Babu N (2008) A neuro-genetic approach for selection of process parameters in abrasive waterjet cutting considering variation in diameter of focusing nozzle. Appl Soft Comput 8:809–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tansel IN, Ozcelik B, Bao WY, Chen P, Rincon D, Yang SY, Yenilmez A (2006) Selection of optimal cutting conditions by using GONNS. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tosun N, Ozler L (2002) A study of tool life in hot machining using artificial neural networks and regression analysis method. J Mater Process Technol 124:99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Venkata Rao R, Pawar PJ (2010) Parameter optimization of a multi-pass milling process using non-traditional optimization algorithms. Appl Soft Comput 10:445–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang WH, Tarng YS (1998) Design optimization of cutting parameters for turning operations based on the Taguchi method. J Mater Process Technol 84:122–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zain AM, Haron H, Sharif S (2010) Application of GA to optimize cutting conditions for minimizing surface roughness in end milling machining process. Expert Systems with Applications 37:4650–4659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zain AM, Haron H, Sharif S (2010) Prediction of surface roughness in the end milling machining using artificial neural network. Expert Syst Appl 37:1755–1768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou J, Duan Z, Li Y, Deng J, Daoyuan Yu (2006) PSO-based neural network optimization and its utilization in a boring machine. J Mater Process Technol 178:19–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zuperl U, Cus F (2003) Optimization of cutting conditions during cutting by using artificial neural networks. Robotics Comput Integr Manuf 19:189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zuperl U, Cus F, Mursec B, Ploj T (2004) A hybrid analytical-neural network approach to the determination of optimal cutting conditions. J Mater Process Technol 157–158:82–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sethu Institute of Technology, Virudhunagar Dist., Tamil Nadu, India

    M. Adam Khan, A. Senthil Kumar & A. Poomari

Authors
  1. M. Adam Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Senthil Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Poomari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Adam Khan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khan, M.A., Kumar, A.S. & Poomari, A. A hybrid algorithm to optimize cutting parameter for machining GFRP composite using alumina cutting tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 59, 1047–1056 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3553-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3553-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation