Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to outline the importance and benefits an organization can achieve through using a decomposition-based decision-making tool incorporating supply chain-balanced scorecard performance measures for supply chain reengineering. An axiomatic design-based model built on the insights gained from supply chain performance measures and reengineering model is applied to a paint company. The model aids supply chain reengineering by identifying the scope of the reengineering design. The resultant reengineering design based on the needs and strategies of the firm in question is presented. A thorough simulation study follows to impart substantial improvements. The case displays how the model can help companies adopt a more structured approach to the complicated problem of supply chain reengineering. This paper focuses on supply chain reengineering models where no conclusive work exists and is expected to fill a gap in the area and be instrumental to both researchers and practitioners by providing a direction for coherent decision making on supply chain reengineering studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tummala VMR, Phillips CLM, Johnson M (2006) Assessing supply chain management success factors: a case study. Supply Chain Manag 11(2):179–192
Ozcelik Y (2010) Do business process reengineering projects pay off? Evidence from the United States. Int J Proj Manag 28:7–13
Burgess R (1998) Avoiding supply chain management failure: lessons from business process re-engineering. Int J Logist Manag 9(1):15–23
Hoek R (1998) Measuring the unmeasurable-measuring and improving performance in the supply chain. Supply Chain Manag 3(4):187
Evans GN, Towill DR, Naim MM (1995) Business process reengineering the supply chain. Prod Plan Control 6(3):38–42
Nissen ME (2000) An intelligent tool for process redesign: manufacturing supply chain applications. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 12(4):321–339
Segars AH, Harkness WJ, Kettinger WJ (2001) Process management and supply chain integration at the Bose Corporation. Interfaces 31(3):102–114
Trkman P, Stemberger MI, Jaklic J, Groznik A (2007) Process approach to supply chain integration. Supply Chain Manag 12(2):116–128
Mohanty RP, Deshmukh SG (2000) Reengineering of a supply chain reengineering system: a case study. Prod Plan Control 11(1):90–104
Kumar A, Ozdamar L, Zhang CN (2008) Supply chain redesign in the healthcare industry of Singapore. Supply Chain Manag 13(2):95–103
McLaughlin J, Motwani J, Madan M, Gunasekaran A (2003) Using information technology to improve downstream supply chain operations: a case study. Bus Process Manag J 9(1):69–80
Sanjay S, Sahay BS, Goyal SK (2006) Reengineering the supply chain in a paint company. Int J Prod Perform Manag 55(8):655–670
Varma S, Wadhwa S, Deshmukh SG (2006) Implementing supply chain management in a firm: issues and remedies. Asia Pac J Market Logist 18(3):223–243
Gorla N, Chinta R, Chu TW (2007) An enhanced business process re-engineering model for supply chain management and a case study. J Inf Tech Case App Res 9(2):5–27
Zhang LL, Jaio RJ, Ma Q (2010) Accountability-based order fulfillment process reengineering towards supply chain management: a case study at a semiconductor equipment manufacturer. J Manuf Tech Manag 21(2):287–305
Fowler A (1998) Operations management and systemic modeling as frameworks for BPR. Int J Op Prod Manag 18(9/10):1028
Trienekens JH, Hvolby HH (2001) Models for supply chain reengineering. Prod Plan Control 12(3):254–264
Cheng LC, Grimm CM (2006) The application of empirical strategic management research to supply chain management. J Bus Logist 27(1):1–55
Diaz MR, Rodriguez TFE (2006) Redesigning the supply chain: reengineering, outsourcing, and relational capabilities. Bus Process Manag J 12(4):483–502
Chen SJ, Huang E (2007) A systematic approach for supply chain improvement using design structure matrix. J Intel Manuf 18:285–299
Simatupang TM, Sridharan R (2005) Supply chain discontent. Bus Process Manag J 11(4):349–369
Suh NP (1990) The principles of design. Oxford University Press, New York
Cochran DS, Arinez JF, Duda JW, Linck J (2002) A decomposition approach for manufacturing system design. J Manuf Syst 20(6):371–389
Schnetzler MJ, Sennheiser A, Schönsleben P (2007) A decomposition-based approach for the development of a supply chain strategy. Int J Prod Eco 105:21–42
Kulak O, Cebi S, Kahraman C (2010) Applications of axiomatic design principles: a literature review. Expert Syst Appl 37:6705–6717
Brown CA (2005) Teaching axiomatic design to engineers—theory, applications, and software. J Manuf Syst 24(3):186–195
Houshmand M, Jamshidnezhad B (2006) An extended model of design processs of lean production systems by means of process variables. Robot Comp Int Manuf 22(1):1–16
Kulak O, Durmusoglu MB, Tufekci SA (2004) Complete cellular manufacturing system design methodology based ob axiomatic design principles. Comp Ind Eng 48:765–787
Kulak O, Kahraman C (2005) Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process. Inform Sc 170(2–4):191–210
Turhan ZD, Vayvay O (2011) A performance-based decision-making tool for supply chain reengineering. Int J Bus Excel 4(3):298–320
Gunasekaran A, Kobu B (2007) Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: a review of recent literature (1995–2004) for research and applications. Int J Prod Res 45(12):2819–2840
Gunasekaran A, Patel C, McGaughey RE (2004) A framework for supply chain performance measurement. Int J Prod Eco 87:333–347
Slone RE (2004) Leading a supply chain turnaround. Harv Bus Rev 82:114–121
Wang G, Huang SH, Dismukes JP (2005) Manufacturing supply chain design and evaluation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25:93–100
Butner K (2010) The smarter supply chain of the future. Strat Lead 38(1):22–31
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turhan, Z.D., Vayvay, O. & Birgun, S. Supply chain reengineering in a paint company using axiomatic design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 57, 421–435 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3296-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3296-4