Skip to main content
Log in

Supply chain reengineering in a paint company using axiomatic design

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to outline the importance and benefits an organization can achieve through using a decomposition-based decision-making tool incorporating supply chain-balanced scorecard performance measures for supply chain reengineering. An axiomatic design-based model built on the insights gained from supply chain performance measures and reengineering model is applied to a paint company. The model aids supply chain reengineering by identifying the scope of the reengineering design. The resultant reengineering design based on the needs and strategies of the firm in question is presented. A thorough simulation study follows to impart substantial improvements. The case displays how the model can help companies adopt a more structured approach to the complicated problem of supply chain reengineering. This paper focuses on supply chain reengineering models where no conclusive work exists and is expected to fill a gap in the area and be instrumental to both researchers and practitioners by providing a direction for coherent decision making on supply chain reengineering studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tummala VMR, Phillips CLM, Johnson M (2006) Assessing supply chain management success factors: a case study. Supply Chain Manag 11(2):179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ozcelik Y (2010) Do business process reengineering projects pay off? Evidence from the United States. Int J Proj Manag 28:7–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burgess R (1998) Avoiding supply chain management failure: lessons from business process re-engineering. Int J Logist Manag 9(1):15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoek R (1998) Measuring the unmeasurable-measuring and improving performance in the supply chain. Supply Chain Manag 3(4):187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Evans GN, Towill DR, Naim MM (1995) Business process reengineering the supply chain. Prod Plan Control 6(3):38–42

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nissen ME (2000) An intelligent tool for process redesign: manufacturing supply chain applications. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 12(4):321–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Segars AH, Harkness WJ, Kettinger WJ (2001) Process management and supply chain integration at the Bose Corporation. Interfaces 31(3):102–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Trkman P, Stemberger MI, Jaklic J, Groznik A (2007) Process approach to supply chain integration. Supply Chain Manag 12(2):116–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohanty RP, Deshmukh SG (2000) Reengineering of a supply chain reengineering system: a case study. Prod Plan Control 11(1):90–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar A, Ozdamar L, Zhang CN (2008) Supply chain redesign in the healthcare industry of Singapore. Supply Chain Manag 13(2):95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McLaughlin J, Motwani J, Madan M, Gunasekaran A (2003) Using information technology to improve downstream supply chain operations: a case study. Bus Process Manag J 9(1):69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sanjay S, Sahay BS, Goyal SK (2006) Reengineering the supply chain in a paint company. Int J Prod Perform Manag 55(8):655–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Varma S, Wadhwa S, Deshmukh SG (2006) Implementing supply chain management in a firm: issues and remedies. Asia Pac J Market Logist 18(3):223–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gorla N, Chinta R, Chu TW (2007) An enhanced business process re-engineering model for supply chain management and a case study. J Inf Tech Case App Res 9(2):5–27

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang LL, Jaio RJ, Ma Q (2010) Accountability-based order fulfillment process reengineering towards supply chain management: a case study at a semiconductor equipment manufacturer. J Manuf Tech Manag 21(2):287–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fowler A (1998) Operations management and systemic modeling as frameworks for BPR. Int J Op Prod Manag 18(9/10):1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Trienekens JH, Hvolby HH (2001) Models for supply chain reengineering. Prod Plan Control 12(3):254–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cheng LC, Grimm CM (2006) The application of empirical strategic management research to supply chain management. J Bus Logist 27(1):1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Diaz MR, Rodriguez TFE (2006) Redesigning the supply chain: reengineering, outsourcing, and relational capabilities. Bus Process Manag J 12(4):483–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen SJ, Huang E (2007) A systematic approach for supply chain improvement using design structure matrix. J Intel Manuf 18:285–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Simatupang TM, Sridharan R (2005) Supply chain discontent. Bus Process Manag J 11(4):349–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Suh NP (1990) The principles of design. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cochran DS, Arinez JF, Duda JW, Linck J (2002) A decomposition approach for manufacturing system design. J Manuf Syst 20(6):371–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schnetzler MJ, Sennheiser A, Schönsleben P (2007) A decomposition-based approach for the development of a supply chain strategy. Int J Prod Eco 105:21–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kulak O, Cebi S, Kahraman C (2010) Applications of axiomatic design principles: a literature review. Expert Syst Appl 37:6705–6717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brown CA (2005) Teaching axiomatic design to engineers—theory, applications, and software. J Manuf Syst 24(3):186–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Houshmand M, Jamshidnezhad B (2006) An extended model of design processs of lean production systems by means of process variables. Robot Comp Int Manuf 22(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kulak O, Durmusoglu MB, Tufekci SA (2004) Complete cellular manufacturing system design methodology based ob axiomatic design principles. Comp Ind Eng 48:765–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kulak O, Kahraman C (2005) Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process. Inform Sc 170(2–4):191–210

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Turhan ZD, Vayvay O (2011) A performance-based decision-making tool for supply chain reengineering. Int J Bus Excel 4(3):298–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gunasekaran A, Kobu B (2007) Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: a review of recent literature (1995–2004) for research and applications. Int J Prod Res 45(12):2819–2840

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Gunasekaran A, Patel C, McGaughey RE (2004) A framework for supply chain performance measurement. Int J Prod Eco 87:333–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Slone RE (2004) Leading a supply chain turnaround. Harv Bus Rev 82:114–121

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang G, Huang SH, Dismukes JP (2005) Manufacturing supply chain design and evaluation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25:93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Butner K (2010) The smarter supply chain of the future. Strat Lead 38(1):22–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ozalp Vayvay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turhan, Z.D., Vayvay, O. & Birgun, S. Supply chain reengineering in a paint company using axiomatic design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 57, 421–435 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3296-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3296-4

Keywords

Navigation