Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ant colony optimization for group technology applications

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of grouping of parts into part-families and that of machines into machine-cells has attracted the attention of many researchers particularly for medium variety of parts with medium production volume requirement, which traditionally required their production in batches for achieving economics of production. This kind of grouping, consequently offering benefits of mass production, was aimed to have independent cells processing ideally almost different sets of part-types. For this purpose, a number of approaches are available from various kinds of heuristics to mathematical programming formulations. Evolutionary methods such as neural network, genetic algorithm, and simulated annealing have also been tried and have been found to provide better grouping solutions with much less computational complexity. In the present paper, ant colony optimization approach with number of newer strategies, incorporating more generalised framework of ants’ behaviour, has been applied to the parts and machines grouping problems taken from the literature. The results obtained from their application were found to be encouraging and thus establish the usefulness of the proposed approaches. Average performance of Tabu search with multiple ants was found to be the best and thus the parameter values for this approach were also determined using design of experiments methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrawal AK (1990) Generalized grouping and loading problems in FMS: models and methodologies. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis: Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India

  2. Askin RG, Subramanian SP (1987) A cost based heuristic for group technology configuration. Int J Prod Res 25(1):101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhardwaj P (2008) Group technology application for flexible manufacturing systems: some models and methodologies. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Technology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India

  4. Chandrasekharan MP, Rajagopalan R (1986) An ideal seed non-hierarchical clustering algorithm for cellular manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 24(2):451–464

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chandrasekharan MP, Rajagopalan R (1989) Groupability: an analysis of the properties of binary data matrices for group technology. Int J Prod Res 27:1035–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen CL, Cotruvo NA, Baek W (1995) A simulated annealing solution to cell formation problem. Int J Prod Res 33:2601–2614

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen S, Cheng C (1995) A neural network-based cell formation algorithm in cellular manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 33:293–318

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Dorigo M, Stutzle T (2004) Ant colony optimization. The MIT press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Goncalves JF, Resende MGC (2004) An evolutionary algorithm for manufacturing cell formation. Comput Ind Eng 47:247–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Islam K, Md S, Sarker BR (2000) A similarity coefficient measure and machine-parts grouping in cellular manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Res 38:699–720

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Islier AA (2005) Group technology by an ant system algorithm. Int J Prod Res 43(5):913–932

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kao Y, Li YL (2008) Ant colony recognition systems for part clustering problems. Int J Prod Res 46(15):4237–4258

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. King JR, Nakornchai V (1982) Machine-component group formation in group technology: review and extension. Int J Prod Res 20(2):117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. King JR (1980) Machine-component grouping in production flow analysis: an approach using rank order clustering. Int J Prod Res 18:213–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kulkarni UR, Kiang MY (1995) Dynamic grouping of parts in flexible manufacturing system—a self-organizing neural network approach. Eur J Oper Res 84:192–212

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar CS, Chandrasekharan MP (1990) Grouping efficacy: a quantitative criterion for goodness of block diagonal forms of binary matrices in group technology. Int J Prod Res 28:233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuo RJ, Chi SC, Teng PW (2001) Generalized part family formation through fuzzy self-organizing feature map neural network. Comput Ind Eng 40:79–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kusiak A, Chow WS (1987) Efficient solving of the group technology problem. J Manuf Syst 6:117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kusiak A (1987) Artificial intelligence and operations research in flexible manufacturing systems. INFOR 25:2–12

    Google Scholar 

  20. Labroche N, Monmarche N, Venturini G (2002) A new clustering algorithm based on the chemical recognition system of ants. Proceedings of ECAI, 345–349

  21. Liu C, WU J (1993) Machine cell formation: using simulated annealing algorithm. Int J Computer Integr Manuf 6:335–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McAuley J (1972) Machine grouping for efficient production. Prod Eng 51(2):53–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pannerselvam R, Balasubramanian KN (1985) Algorithm grouping of operation sequences. Eng Costs Prod Econ 13(6):567–579

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rajagopalan R, Batra JL (1975) Design of cellular production systems: a graph theoretic approach. Int J Prod Res 13(6):567–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Seifoddini H, Wolfe PM (1986) Selection of a threshold value based on the material handling cost in machine-component grouping. IIE Trans 19(3):266–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Seifoddini H (1989) Single linkage versus average linkage clustering in machine cells formation applications. Comput Ind Eng 16(3):419–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shafer SM, Rogers DF (1993) Similarity and distance measures for cellular manufacturing, Part I, A survey. Int J Prod Res 31:1133–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sofainopoulou S (1997) Application of simulated annealing to a linear model for formulation of machine cells in group technology. Int J Prod Res 35:501–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shanker K, Agrawal AK (1997) Models and solution methodologies for the generalized grouping problem in cellular manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 35:513–538

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Srinivasan G, Narendran TT, Mahadevan B (1990) An assignment model for the part-families problem in group technology. Int J Prod Res 28(1):145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Uddin MK, Shanker K (2002) Grouping of parts and machines in presence of alternative process route by genetic algorithm. Int J Prod Res 76:219–228

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zolfaghari S, Liang M (2003) A new genetic algorithm for the machine/part grouping problem in involving processing times and lot sizes. Comput Ind Eng 45:713–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prabhas Bhardwaj.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agrawal, A.K., Bhardwaj, P. & Srivastava, V. Ant colony optimization for group technology applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55, 783–795 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-3097-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-3097-1

Keywords

Navigation